Shared Decision Making Does Not Influence Physicians against Clinical Practice Guidelines

PLoS ONE

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 2013, Pages

  Guerrier, Mireille ^a   Légaré, France ^a,b   Turcotte, Stéphane ^a   Labrecque, Michel ^a   Rivest, Louis Paul ^b  

^a LAVAL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR CONTROL; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; COMPLIANCE (PHYSICAL); CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; PHYSICIAN; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; QUESTIONNAIRE; SHARED DECISION MAKING;

ADULT; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTENTION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; PHYSICIANS; PHYSICIANS, FAMILY; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC;

EID: 84876542907     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062537     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Kuehn BM, (2009) States explore shared decision making. JAMA 301: 2539-2541.
2. Field MJ, Lohr KN (1992) Guidelines for clinical practice: from development to use. Washington, D.C.: Institute of Medicine.
3. Woolf SH, Grol R, Hutchinson A, Eccles M, Grimshaw J, (1999) Clinical guidelines: Potential benefits, limitations, and harms of clinical guidelines. BMJ 318: 527-530.
4. Barratt A, (2008) Evidence Based Medicine and Shared Decision Making: the challenge of getting both evidence and preferences into health care. Patient Educ Couns 73: 407-412.
5. Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T, (1997) Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango). Soc Sci Med 44: 681-692.
6. Foundation IMD (2011-2013) What is Shared Decision Making?.
7. Haynes RB, Devereaux PJ, Guyatt GH, (2002) Physicians' and patients' choices in evidence based practice. BMJ 324: 1350.
8. Weston WW, (2001) Informed and shared decision-making: the crux of patient-centered care. CMAJ 165: 438-439.
9. Field MJ, Lohr KN (1990) Clinical Practice Guidelines: Directions for a New Program. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
10. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, et al. (2008) GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 336: 924-926.
11. Schunemann HJ, Fretheim A, Oxman AD, (2006) Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 10. Integrating values and consumer involvement. Health Res Policy Syst 4: 22.
12. Kelson M, Akl EA, Bastian H, Cluzeau F, Curtis JR, et al. (2012) Integrating Values and Consumer Involvement in Guidelines with the Patient at the Center: Article 8 in Integrating and Coordinating Efforts in COPD Guideline Development. An Official ATS/ERS Workshop Report. Proc Am Thorac Soc 9: 262-268.
13. Krahn M, Naglie G, (2008) The next step in guideline development: incorporating patient preferences. JAMA 300: 436-438.
14. Chong CA, Chen IJ, Naglie G, Krahn MD, (2009) How well do guidelines incorporate evidence on patient preferences? J Gen Intern Med 24: 977-982.
15. Nutt PC, Wilson DC (2010) Handbook of Decision Making: Wiley-Blackwell.
16. Légaré F, Ratte S, Stacey D, Kryworuchko J, Gravel K, et al. (2010) Interventions for improving the adoption of shared decision making by healthcare professionals. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 5: CD006732.
17. Grimshaw JM, Thomas RE, MacLennan G, Fraser C, Ramsay CR, et al. (2004) Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies. Health Technol Assess 8: iii-iv, 1-72.
18. Barratt A (2008) Evidence Based Medicine and Shared Decision Making: The challenge of getting both evidence and preferences into health care. Patient Educ Couns.
19. Icek A (1988) Attitudes, personnality and behavior: Open University Press.
20. Armitage CJ, Conner M, (2001) Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour: a meta-analytic review. Br J Soc Psychol 40: 471-499.
21. Leblanc A, Légaré F, Labrecque M, Godin G, Thivierge R, et al. (2011) Feasibility of a randomised trial of a continuing medical education program in shared decision-making on the use of antibiotics for acute respiratory infections in primary care: the DECISION+ pilot trial. Implement Sci 6: 5.
22. Légaré F, Labrecque M, LeBlanc A, Njoya M, Laurier C, et al. (2011) Training family physicians in shared decision making for the use of antibiotics for acute respiratory infections: a pilot clustered randomized controlled trial. Health Expect 14Suppl 1: 96-110.
23. Légaré F, Labrecque M, Cauchon M, Castel J, Turcotte S, et al. (2012) Training family physicians in shared decision-making to reduce the overuse of antibiotics in acute respiratory infections: a cluster randomized trial. CMAJ 184: E726-734.
24. INESSS (2009) Clinical Guides in Antibiotic Treatment -1st series.
25. Weiss K, Blais R, Fortin A, Lantin S, Gaudet M, (2011) Impact of a multipronged education strategy on antibiotic prescribing in Quebec, Canada. Clin Infect Dis 53: 433-439.
26. Francis J, Eccles M, Johnston M, Walker A, Grimshaw J, et al. (2004) Constructing questionnaires based on the theory of planned behaviour: A manual for health services researchers. Newcastle upon Tyne: Centre for Health Services Research, University of Newcastle.
27. Gagné C, Godin G (1999) Les théories sociales cognitives: Guide pour la mesure des variables et le développement de questionnaire. Bibliothèque nationale du Canada.
28. Hatcher L (2009) A Step-by-Step approach to using SAS for Factor analysis and structural equation modeling. Carry, NC: SAS Institute Inc.
29. Sánchez BN, Budtz-Jorgensen E, Ryan LM, Hu H (2005) Structural Equation Models. Journal of the American Statistical Association 100.
30. Bentler PM (2006) EQS 6 Structural Equations Program Manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software, Inc.
31. Byrne BM (2010) Structural Equation Modeling with Amos: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. NY: Routledge.
32. Schreiber JB, Stage FK, King J, Nora A, Barlow EA (2006) Reporting Structural Equation Modeling and Confirmatory Factor Analysis Results: A Review. The Journal of Educational Research 99.
33. Hu L, Bentler P, (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventionnal criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation modeling. 6: 1-55.
34. Fichman M (2003) Multiple Imputation for Missing Data: Making the Most of What you Know.
35. Klausen SH, Mikkelsen UR, Hirth A, Wetterslev J, Kjaergaard H, et al. (2012) Design and rationale for the PREVAIL study: effect of e-Health individually tailored encouragements to physical exercise on aerobic fitness among adolescents with congenital heart disease-a randomized clinical trial. Am Heart J 163: 549-556.
36. James EL, Stacey F, Chapman K, Lubans DR, Asprey G, et al. (2011) Exercise and nutrition routine improving cancer health (ENRICH): the protocol for a randomized efficacy trial of a nutrition and physical activity program for adult cancer survivors and carers. BMC Public Health 11: 236.
37. Boivin A, Légaré F, Gagnon MP, (2008) Competing norms: Canadian rural family physicians' perceptions of clinical practice guidelines and shared decision-making. J Health Serv Res Policy 13: 79-84.
38. Solomon J, Raynor DK, Knapp P, Atkin K, (2012) The compatibility of prescribing guidelines and the doctor-patient partnership: a primary care mixed-methods study. Br J Gen Pract 62: e275-281.
39. van der Weijden T, Légaré F, Boivin A, Burgers JS, van Veenendaal H, et al. (2010) How to integrate individual patient values and preferences in clinical practice guidelines? A research protocol. Implement Sci 5: 10.
40. van der Weijden T, Boivin A, Burgers J, Schunemann HJ, Elwyn G, (2012) Clinical practice guidelines and patient decision aids. An inevitable relationship. Journal of clinical epidemiology 65: 584-589.
41. Bastian H, (1996) Raising the standard: practice guidelines and consumer participation. Int J Qual Health Care 8: 485-490.
42. IOM (2011) Standards for Developing Trustworthy Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs).
43. IOM (2011) Clinical Practice Guidelines We Can Trust.
44. Owens DK, (1998) Spine update. Patient preferences and the development of practice guidelines. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 23: 1073-1079.
45. Godin G, Belanger-Gravel A, Eccles M, Grimshaw J, (2008) Healthcare professionals' intentions and behaviours: a systematic review of studies based on social cognitive theories. Implement Sci 3: 36.
46. Gravel K, Légaré F, Graham ID, (2006) Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: a systematic review of health professionals' perceptions. Implement Sci 1: 16.
47. Cabana MD, Rand CS, Powe NR, Wu AW, Wilson MH, et al. (1999) Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. JAMA 282: 1458-1465.
48. Hung SY, Ku YC, Chien JC, (2012) Understanding physicians' acceptance of the Medline system for practicing evidence-based medicine: a decomposed TPB model. Int J Med Inform 81: 130-142.
49. Légaré F, St-Jacques S, Gagnon S, Njoya M, Brisson M, et al. (2011) Prenatal screening for Down syndrome: a survey of willingness in women and family physicians to engage in shared decision-making. Prenat Diagn.
50. Holmes-Rovner M, Gruman J, Rovner DR, (2007) Shared decision-making in the US-research & development outpaces delivery. Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich 101: 254-258.