The compatibility of prescribing guidelines and the doctor-patient partnership: A primary caremixed-methods study

British Journal of General Practice

Volumn 62, Issue 597, 2012, Pages

  Solomon, Josie ^a   Raynor, David K ^b   Knapp, Peter ^c   Atkin, Karl ^c  

^a DE MONTFORT UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Decisionmaking; Evidence based practice; Patient compliance; Physician patient relations; Professional practice

Indexed keywords

HYDROXYMETHYLGLUTARYL COENZYME A REDUCTASE INHIBITOR; PROTON PUMP INHIBITOR;

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST CONTROL; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; NAMED GROUPS BY OCCUPATION; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRESCRIPTION; PRIMARY CARE TRUST PRESCRIBING ADVISOR; QUESTIONNAIRE; TRUST;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; COMMUNICATION; DECISION MAKING; ENGLAND; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; FAMILY PRACTICE; HUMANS; HYDROXYMETHYLGLUTARYL-COA REDUCTASE INHIBITORS; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; PROTON PUMP INHIBITORS; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 84859450823     PISSN: 09601643     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3399/bjgp12X636119     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Department of Health. Equity and excellence: Liberating the NHS. CM7881. London: Stationery Office, 2010: 3-4.
2. Campbell SM, Braspenning J, Hutchinson A, Marshall M. Researchmethods used in developing and applying quality indicators in primary care. Qual Saf Health Care 2002; 11(4): 358-364. (Pubitemid 35463394)
3. Charles C, Whelan T, Gafni A. Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: What does it mean? (Or it takes at least two to tango). Soc Sci Med 1997; 44(5): 681-692. (Pubitemid 27067502)
4. RPSBG Working Party. From Compliance to concordance - achieving shared goals in medicine taking. London: The Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain and Merck Sharp & Dome, 1997.
5. Rogers W. Evidence-based medicine in practice: limiting or facilitating patient choice? Health Expect 2002; 5(2): 95-103. (Pubitemid 34591870)
6. Penston J. Patients' preferences shed light on the murky world of guideline-based medicine. J Eval Clin Pract 2007; 13(1): 154-159. (Pubitemid 46238811)
7. Bensing J. Bridging the gap. The separate worlds of evidence-based medicine and patient-centred medicine. Patient Educ Couns 2000; 39(1): 17-25.
8. Avery A. Polypharmacy: one of the greatest prescribing challenges in general practice. Br J Gen Pract 2011; 61(583): 83-84.
9. Verheij T. Is patient-centred care a tautology? View from The Netherlands. Br J Gen Pract 2011; 61(588): 472.
10. Sanders T, Harrison S, Checkland K. Evidence-based medicine and patient choice: the case of heart failure. J Health Serv Res Policy 2008; 13(2): 103-108. (Pubitemid 351702975)
11. Doran T, Fullwood C. Pay for performance: is it the best way to improve control of hypertension? Curr Hypertens Rep 2007; 9(5): 360-367. (Pubitemid 350226318)
12. Doran T, Fullwood C, Kontopantelis E, Reeves D. Effect of financial incentives on inequalities in the delivery of primary clinical care in England: analysis of clinical activity indicators for the quality and outcomes framework. Lancet 2008; 372(964): 728-736.
13. Starfield B. Quality and outcomes framework: patient-centred? Lancet 2008; 372(9640): 692-694.
14. Quinn Patton M. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. London: Sage, 2001.
15. Silverman D. Interpreting qualitative data: methods for analyzing talk, text and interaction. 3rd edn. London: Sage, 2006.
16. Ritchie J, Spencer L. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In: Bryman A, Burgess R (eds.). Analyzing qualitative data. London: Routledge, 1994.
17. Likert R. New patterns of management. New York, NY: McGraw Hill, 1961.