Economics and Elections Revisited

Comparative Political Studies

Volumn 46, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 551-573

  Nadeau, Richard ^a   Lewis Beck, Michael S ^b   Bélanger, Éric ^c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^c MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

economic voting; economics; elections; endogeneity; Western Europe

Indexed keywords

EID: 84876527449     PISSN: 00104140     EISSN: 15523829     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0010414012463877     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Anderson C. J.Blaming the government: Citizens and the economy in five European democracies. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe; 1995:.
2. Anderson C. J.Economic voting and political context: A comparative perspective.Electoral Studies. 2000;19:151-170.
3. Anderson C. J.,Mendes S. M.,Tverdova Y. V.Endogenous economic voting: Evidence from the 1997 British election.Electoral Studies. 2004;23:683-708.
4. Bélanger É.,Lewis-Beck M. S.The French voter: Before and after the 2002 elections. Lewis-Beck M. S., ed. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan; 2004:231-242.
5. Bélanger É.,Lewis-Beck M. S.,Chiche J.,Tiberj V.Party, ideology, and vote intentions: Dynamics from the 2002 French electoral panel.Political Research Quarterly. 2006;59:503-515.
6. Burkhart R. E.,Lewis-Beck M. S.Comparative democracy: The economic development thesis.American Political Science Review. 1994;88:903-910.
7. Campbell A.,Converse P. E.,Miller W. E.,Stokes D. E.The American voter. New York, NY: John Wiley; 1960:.
8. Duch R. M.,Palmer H. D.,Anderson C. J.Heterogeneity in perceptions of national economic conditions.American Journal of Political Science. 2000;44:635-652.
9. Duch R. M.,Stevenson R. T.The economic vote: How political and economic institutions condition election results. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 2008:.
10. Erikson R. S.The American voter and the economy, 2008.PS: Political Science & Politics. 2009;17:467-471.
11. Evans G.,Andersen R.The political conditioning of economic perceptions.Journal of Politics. 2006;68:194-207.
12. Fiorina M. P.Retrospective voting in American national elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 1981:.
13. Fraile M.,Lewis-Beck M. S.Economic voting in Spain: A 2000 panel test.Electoral Studies. 2010;29:210-220.
14. Greene W. H.Econometric analysis. 1997). Econometric analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1997:.
15. Hellwig T. T.Interdependence, government constraints, and economic voting.Journal of Politics. 2001;63:1141-1162.
16. Key V. O.The responsible electorate. New York, NY: Vintage; 1966:.
17. Kiewiet D. R.Macroeconomics and micropolitics: The electoral effects of economic issues. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1983:.
18. Kiewiet D. R.,Rivers R. D.A retrospective on retrospective voting.Political Behavior. 1984;6:369-393.
19. Kmenta J.Elements of econometrics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press; 1997:.
20. Kramer G. H.The ecological fallacy revisited: Aggregate- versus individual-level findings on economics and elections, and sociotropic voting.American Political Science Review. 1983;77:92-111.
21. Lewis-Beck M. S.Economics and elections: The major Western democracies. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press; 1988:.
22. Lewis-Beck M. S.Economics and politics: The calculus of support. Norpoth H.Lewis-Beck M. S.Lafay J.-D., ed. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press; 1991:1-6.
23. Lewis-Beck M. S.,Costa Lobo M.Anchoring the Portuguese voter: Panel dynamics in a newer electorate.Political Research Quarterly. 2011;64:293-308.
24. Lewis-Beck M. S.,Jacoby W. G.,Norpoth H.,Weisberg H. F.The American voter revisited. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press; 2008:.
25. Lewis-Beck M. S.,Nadeau R.,Elias A.Economics, party, and the vote: Causality issues and panel data.American Journal of Political Science. 2008;52:84-95.
26. Lewis-Beck M. S.,Stegmaier M.Economic determinants of electoral outcomes.Annual Review of Political Science. 2000;3:183-219.
27. Lewis-Beck M. S.,Stegmaier M.The Oxford handbook of political behaviour. Dalton R.Klingemann H.-D., ed. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2007:518-527.
28. Monroe K. R.Presidential popularity and the economy. New York, NY: Praeger; 1984:.
29. Nadeau R.,Lewis-Beck M. S.National economic voting in U.S. presidential elections.Journal of Politics. 2001;63:159-181.
30. Nadeau R.,Niemi R. G.,Yoshinaka A.A cross-national analysis of economic voting: Taking account of the political context across time and nations.Electoral Studies. 2002;21:403-423.
31. Nannestad P.,Paldam M.The VP function: A survey of the literature on vote and popularity functions after 25 years.Public Choice. 1994;79:213-245.
32. Norpoth H.Comparing democracies: Elections and voting in global perspective. LeDuc L.Niemi R. G.Norris P., ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1996:299-318.
33. Raudenbush S. W.,Bryk A. S.Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. 2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2002:.
34. Sanders D.Party identification, economic perceptions, and voting in British general elections, 1974-97.Electoral Studies. 2003;22:239-263.
35. van der Brug W.,van der Eijk C.,Franklin M. N.The economy and the vote: Economic conditions and elections in fifteen countries. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 2007:.
36. Wlezien C.,Franklin M. N.,Twiggs D.Economic perceptions and vote choice: Disentangling the endogeneity.Political Behavior. 1997;19:7-17.
37. Woolridge J. M.Introductory econometrics: A modern approach. 2006). Introductory econometrics: A modern approach (3rd ed.). Mason, OH: Thomson South-West.Mason, OH: Thomson South-West; 2006:.