Economic voting and political context: A comparative perspective

Electoral Studies

Volumn 19, Issue 2-3, 2000, Pages 151-170

  Anderson, Christopher J ^a  

^a BINGHAMTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Accountability; Economic perceptions; Economic voting; Europe

Indexed keywords

COMPARATIVE STUDY; ECONOMIC CONDITIONS; VOTING BEHAVIOR;

EUROPE;

EID: 0034001953     PISSN: 02613794     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0261-3794(99)00045-1     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Anderson, C.J., 1995a. Blaming the Government: Citizens and the Economy in Five European Democracies. Sharpe, Armonk, NY.
2. Anderson, C.J., 1995b. The dynamics of public support for coalition governments. Comparative Political Studies 28, 350-383.
3. Bellucci, P., 1991. Italian economic voting: a deviant case or making a case for better theory? In: Norpoth, H., Lewis-Beck, M.S., Lafay, J.D. (Eds.) Economics and Politics: The Calculus of Support. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI, pp. 63-84.
4. Eulau, H., Lewis-Beck, M.S., 1985. Economic Conditions and Electoral Outcomes in the United States and Western Europe. Agathon, New York.
5. Laakso, M., Taagepera, R., 1979. Effective number of parties: a measure with application to West Europe. Comparative Political Studies 12, 3-27.
6. Lewis-Beck, M.S., 1986. Comparative economic voting: Britain, France, Germany, Italy. American Journal of Political Science 30, 315-346.
7. Lewis-Beck, M.S., 1988. Economics and Elections: The Major Western Democracies. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI.
8. Lewis-Beck, M.S., 1991. Introduction. In: Norpoth, H., Lewis-Beck, M.S., Lafay, J.D. (Eds.) Economics and Politics: The Calculus of Support. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI, pp. 1-8.
9. Lewis-Beck, M.S., Mitchell, G., 1993. Bringing politics back in: the french lesson for popularity functions. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.
10. Lijphart, A., 1984. Democracies. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
11. McDonald, M.D., Budge, I., Hofferbert, R.I., 1999. Governments, parties, elections, and votes: balancing past performance and future choice. Ms. Binghamton University (State University of New York).
12. Nannestad, P., Paldam, M., 1994. The vp-function: a survey of the literature on vote and popularity functions after 25 years. Public Choice 79, 213-245.
13. Norpoth, A., 1996. The economy. In: LeDuc, L., Niemi, R.G., Norris, P. (Eds.) Comparing Democracies: Elections and Voting in Global Perspective. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
14. Pacek, A., Radcliff, B., 1995. Economic voting and the welfare state: a cross-national analysis. Journal of Politics 57, 44-61.
15. Paldam, M., 1991. How robust is the vote function? In: Norpoth, H., Lewis-Beck, M.S., Lafay, J.D. (Eds.) Economics and Politics: The Calculus of Support. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI, pp. 9-31.
16. Powell, G.B., 1989. Constitutional design and citizen electoral control. Journal of Theoretical Politics 1, 107-130.
17. Powell, G.B., Whitten, G.D., 1993. A cross-national analysis of economic voting: taking account of the political context. American Journal of Political Science 37, 391-414.
18. Rae, D., 1967. The Political Consequences of Electoral Laws. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
19. Sørensen, R.J., 1987. Macroeconomic policy and government popularity in Norway, 1963-1986. Scandinavian Political Studies 10, 301-321.
20. Taagepera, R., Shugart, M.S., 1993. Seats and Votes. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
21. Wilkin, S., Haller, B., Norpoth, H., 1997. From Argentina to Zambia: a world-wide test of economic voting. Electoral Studies 16, 301-316.