Proactiveness and corporate social performance in the global forest industry

International Forestry Review

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 112-121

  Tuppura, A ^a   Toppinen, A ^b   Jantunen, A ^a  

^a LAPPEENRANTA UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

corporate responsibility; environmental management; forest industry; proactiveness

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; ETHICS; FORESTRY; STAKEHOLDER;

EID: 84876519103     PISSN: 14655489     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1505/146554813805927147     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. ARAGÓN-CORREA, J. 1998. Strategic proactivity and firm approach to the natural environment. Academy of Management Journal 41(5).
2. ARORA, P. AND DHARWADKAR, R. 2011. Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility (CSR): the moderating roles of attainment discrepancy and organizational slack. Corporate governance: An international Review 19(2).
3. BANSAL, P. 2005. Evolving sustainably: A Longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development. Strategic Management journal 26(3).
4. BANSAL, P. and ROTH, K. 2000. Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness. Academy of Management Journal 43(4).
5. BIERLY, P.E., DAMANPOUR, F. and SANTORO, M.D. 2009. The Application of External Knowledge: Organizational Conditions for Exploration and Exploitation, Journal of Management Studies 46(3).
6. BRANCO, M.C. and RODRIGUEZ, L.L. 2006. Corporate social responsibility and resource-based perspectives. Journal of Business Ethics 69(2).
7. BUYSSE, K. and VERBEKE, A. 2003. Proactive environmental strategies: A Stakeholder management perspective. Strategic Management Journal 24(5).
8. CARROLL, A.B. 1979. A Three-Dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review 4(4).
9. CARROLL, A.B. 1999. Corporate social responsibility. Business and Society 38(3).
10. CRIFO, P. and FORGET, V. 2012. The economics of corporate social responsibility: A survey. Ecole Polytechnique, Departement D'Economie. Cahier no. 2012-21.
11. DAHLSRUD, A. 2008. How corporate social responsibility is defined: An analysis of 37 definitions. Corporate Social responsibility and Environment Management 15(1).
12. DARNALL, N., HENRIQUES, I. and SADORSKY, P. 2010. Adopting proactive environmental strategy: the influence of stakeholders and firm size. Journal of Management Studies 47(6).
13. DIJKEN, F. VAN, 2007. Corporate social responsibility: market regulation and the evidence. Managerial Law 49(4).
14. DIXON-FOWLER, H.R., SLATER, D.J., JOHNSON, J.L., ELLSTRAND, A.E., and ROMI, A.M. 2012. Beyond "Does it pay to be green?" A meta-analysis of moderators of the CEP-CFP relationship, forthcoming in Journal of Business Ethics.
15. EUROPEAN COMMISSION. 2001. Green Paper: Promoting a European Framework for Corporate Social Responsibility. COM (2001) 366 final, 18.7.2001, Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.
16. FIG, D. 2007. Questioning CSR in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest: the case of Aracruz Celulose SA. Third World Quarterly 28(4).
17. GALBREATH, J. 2010. Drivers of corporate social responsibility: The role of formal strategic planning and firm culture. British Journal of Management 21.
18. GREENING, D.W. and GRAY, G. 1994. Testing a model of organizational response to social and political issues. Academy of Management Journal 37(3).
19. HART, S.L. 1995. A Natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review 20(4).
20. HUJALA, M., VIRTA, H. and PUUMALAINEN, K. (forthcoming). Explaining the shifts of international trade in pulp and paper industry. Forthcoming in Forest Science.
21. KURUCZ, E. COLBERT, B. and WHEELER, D. 2008. The business case for corporate social responsibility. In: (ed. Crane, A., McWilliams, A. Moon, J. and Siegel, D.) The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
22. LI, N. and TOPPINEN, A. 2011. Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainable Competitive Advantage in the Forest-based Industry: Complementary or Conflicting Goals? Forest Policy and Economics 13(1).
23. LI, N., PUUMALAINEN, K. and TOPPINEN, A. 2011. Managerial perceptions on corporate social and financial performance in global forest industry. The Corporate Responsibility Research Conference, 12.-14.9.2011, Leeds, UK. http://www.crrconference.org/previousconferences/ crrc-2011/index.html.
24. LUMPKIN, G.T. and DESS, G.G. 1996. Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review 21(1).
25. LUO, Y. 2003. Industrial dynamics and managerial networking in an emerging market: the case of China. Strategic Management Journal 24(13).
26. MARREWIJK, M. VAN, 2003. Concepts and definitions of CSR and corporate sustainability: Between agency and communication. Journal of Business Ethics 44(2/3).
27. MCWILLIAMS, A. and SIEGEL, D. 2000. Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Correlation or misspecification. Strategic Management Journal 21(5).
28. MCWILLIAMS, A. and SIEGEL, D. 2001. Corporate social responsibility: A Theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review 26(1).
29. MIKKILÄ, M. 2006. The many faces of responsibility: Acceptability of the global pulp and paper industry in various societies. University of Joensuu, Faculty of Forestry. Dissertationes Forestales 25.
30. MILLER, D. and FRIESEN, P.H. 1978. Archetypes of strategy formulation. Management Science 24(9).
31. MISANI, N. 2010. The convergence of corporate social responsibility practices. Management Research Review 33(7).
32. MYLLYLÄ, S. and TAKALA, T. 2011. Leaking legitimacies: the Finnish forest sector's entanglement in the land conflicts of Atlantic coastal Brazil. Social Responsibility Journal 7(1).
33. MÄKELÄ, H. and NÄSI, S. 2010. Social responsibilities of MNCs in downsizing operations: A Finnish forest sector case analysed from the stakeholder, social contract and legitimacy theory point of view. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 23(2).
34. NAGUBADI, R.V. and ZHANG, D. 2008. Foreign direct investment outflows in the forest products industry: The case of United States and Japan. International Forestry Review 10(4).
35. ORLITZKY, M., SCHMIDT, F.L. and RYNES, S. 2003. Corporate social and financial performance: A Meta-analysis. Organization Studies 24(3).
36. PADGETT, R.C. and GALAN, J.I. 2010. The effect of R&D intensity on corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 93(3).
37. PANWAR, R. and HANSEN, E. 2009. A process for identifying social and environmental issues: a case of the US forest products manufacturing industry. Journal of Public Affairs 9(4).
38. PANWAR, R., RINNE, T., HANSEN, E. and JUSLIN, H. 2006. Corporate Responsibility: Balancing economic, environmental and social issues in the forest products industry. Forest Products Journal 56(2).
39. RAMUS, C.A. and STEGER, U. 2000. The roles of supervisory support behaviors and environmental policy in employee "ecoinitiatives" at leading-edge European companies. Academy of Management Journal 43(4).
40. RUSSO, M.V. and FOUTS, P.A. 1997. A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of Management Journal 40(3).
41. SALZMANN, O., IONESCU-SOMERS A. and STEGER, U. 2005. The business case for corporate sustainability: Literature review and research options. European Management Journal 23(1).
42. SETHI, S.P. 1979. A conceptual framework for environmental analysis of social issues and evaluation of business response patterns. Academy of Management Review 4(1).
43. SHARMA, S. 2000. Managerial interpretations and organizational context as predictors of corporate choice of environmental strategy. Academy of Management Journal 43(4).
44. SHARMA, S. and VREDENBURG, H. 1998. Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable organizational capabilities. Strategic Management Journal 19(8).
45. STANWICK, P.A. and STANWICK, S.D. 1998. The relationship between corporate social performance, and organizational size, financial performance, and environmental performance: and empirical examination. Journal of Business Ethics 17(2).
46. SURROCA, J., TRIBÓ, J.A. and WADDOCK, S. 2010. Corporate responsibility and financial performance: The Role of intangible resources. Strategic Management Journal 31(5).
47. TURKER, D. 2009. Measuring corporate social responsibilit y: A scale development study. Journal of Business Ethics 85(4).
48. VAN BEURDEN, P. and GÖSSLING, T. 2008. The worth of values - the literature review on the relation between corporate social and financial performance. Journal of Business Ethics 82(2).
49. VIDAL, N.G. and KOZAK, R.A., 2008. Corporate responsibility practices in the forestry sector. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship 31(Autumn).
50. VIDAL, N.G., KOZAK, R.A. and COHEN, D. 2005. Chain of custody certification: an assessment of the North American solid wood sector. Forest Policy and Economics 7(3).
51. WADDOCK, S.A. and GRAVES, S.B. 1997. The Corporate social performance - financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal 18(4).
52. WEBER, M. 2008. The business case for measuring corporate social responsibility: a company level measurement approach for CSR. European Management Journal 26.
53. WOOD, D.J. 2010. Measuring corporate social performance: A review. International Journal of Management Reviews 12(1).
54. ZHANG, Y. and TOPPINEN, A. 2011. Internationalization and financial performance in the global forest industry. International Forestry Review 13(1).