Combinatorial testing

Handbook of Research on Software Engineering and Productivity Technologies: Implications of Globalization

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 196-208

  Bryce, Renée C ^a   Lei, Yu ^b   Kuhn, D Richard ^c   Kacker, Raghu ^c  

^a UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON   (United States)

^c NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84876473829     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-60566-731-7.ch014     Document Type: Chapter

References (28)

1. th Digital Avionics Systems Conference, 2(10), 1-10.
2. Bell, K. Z. (2006). Optimizing Effectiveness and Efficiency of Software Testing: a Hybrid Approach. PhD Dissertation, North Carolina State University.
3. Bryce, R., & Colbourn, C. J. (2007). The Density Algorithm for Pairwise Interaction Testing. Journal of Software Testing. Verification and Reliability, 17(3), 159-182. doi:10.1002/stvr.365
4. Bryce, R., & Colbourn, C. J. (2009). A DensityBased Greedy Algorithm for Higher Strength Covering Arrays. Journal of Software Testing, Verification, and Reliability, 19(1), 37-53. doi:10.1002/stvr.393
5. Burr, K., & Young, W. (1998). Combinatorial test techniques: Table-based automation, test generation, and code coverage. International Conference on Software Testing Analysis and Review (pp. 503-513).
6. Cohen, D.M., Dalal, S. R., Fredman, M. L., & Patton, G. C. (1996). Method and system for automatically generating efficient test cases for systems having interacting elements [United States Patent, Number 5, 542, 043].
7. Cohen, D. M., Dalal, S. R., Fredman, M. L., & Patton, G. C. (1997). The AETG system: an approach to testing based on combinatorial design. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 23(7), 437-444. doi:10.1109/32.605761
8. Cohen, D. M., Dalal, S. R., Parelius, J., & Patton, G. C. (1996). The combinatorial design approach to automatic test generation. IEEE Software, 13(5), 83-88. doi:10.1109/52.536462
9. Cohen, M. B., Colbourn, C. J., Gibbons, P. B., & Mugridge, W. B. (2003). Constructing test suites for interaction testing. International Conference on Software Engineering (pp. 38-48).
10. Cohen, M. B., Colbourn, C. J., & Ling, A. C. H. (2008). Constructing Strength 3 Covering Arrays with Augmented Annealing. Discrete Mathematics, 308, 2709-2722. doi:10.1016/j.disc.2006.06.036
11. Colbourn, C. J. (2004). Combinatorial aspects of covering arrays. Le Matematiche (Catania), 58, 121-167.
12. Dalal, S. R., Jain, A., Karunanithi, N., Leaton, J. M., Lott, C. M., Patton, G. C., & Horowitz, B. M. (1999). Model-Based Testing in Practice. International Conference on Software Engineering (pp. 285-294).
13. du Bousquet, L., Ledru, Y., Maury, O., Oriat, C., & Lanet, J.-L. (2004). A case study in JML-based software validation. IEEE International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (pp. 294-297).
14. Dunietz, S. Ehrlich, W. K. Szablak, B. D. Mallows, C. L. & Iannino, A. (1997). Applying design of experiments to software testing. International. Conference on Software Engineering (pp. 205-215).
15. Fischer, R. A. (1926). The Arrangement of Field Experiments. Journal of Ministry of Agriculture of Great Britain, 33, 503-513.
16. Hartman, A., Klinger, T., & Raskin, L. (2008). IBM Intelligent Test Case Handler. Retrieved on August 30, 2008, from http://www.alphaworks.ibm.com/tech/whitch
17. Hartman, A., & Raskin, L. (2004). Problems and algorithms for covering arrays. Discrete Mathematics, 284, 149-156. doi:10.1016/j.disc.2003.11.029
18. Kuhn, D. R., & Reilly, M. (2002). An investigation of the applicability of design of experiments to software testing. NASA Goddard/IEEE Software Engineering Workshop (pp. 91-95).
19. Kuhn, D. R., Wallace, D., & Gallo, A. (2004). Software Fault Interactions and Implications for Software Testing. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 30(6), 418-421. doi:10.1109/TSE.2004.24
20. Leavens, G. T., Baker, A. L., & Ruby, C. (1999). JML: A notation for detailed design. In H. Kilov, B. Rumpe, & I. Simmonds, (Ed.) Behavioral Specifications of Businesses and Systems.
21. Lei, Y. Kacker, R. Kuhn, D. R., Okun, V., & Lawrence J. (2008). IPOG/IPOD: Efficient Test Generation for Multi-Way Combinatorial Testing. Journal of Software Testing, Verification, and Reliability, 18(3), 125-148. doi:10.1002/stvr.381
22. Lei, Y., & Tai, K. C. (1998). In-parameter-order: a test generation strategy for pairwise testing. International High-Assurance Systems Engineering Symposium (pp. 254-261).
23. NIST. (2003). The Economic Impacts of Inadequate Infrastructure for software testing. Retrieved from http://www.nist.gov/director/prog-ofc/report02-3.pdf
24. Tai, K. C., & Lei, Y. (2002). A test generation strategy for pairwise testing. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 28(1), 109-111. doi:10.1109/32.979992
25. Tung, Y. W., & Aldiwan, W. S. (2000). Automating test case generation for the new generation mission software system. IEEE Aerospace Conference (pp. 431-437).
26. Wallace, D. R., & Kuhn, D. R. (2001). Failure Modes in Medical Device Software: an Analysis of 15 Years of Recall Data. International Journal of Reliability Quality and Safety Engineering, 8(4). doi:10.1142/S021853930100058X
27. Williams, A., & Probert, R. L. (2001). A measure for component interaction test coverage. ACS/IEEE International Conference on Computer Systems and Applications (pp. 301-311).
28. Yilmaz, C., Cohen, M. B., & Porter, A. (2006). Covering arrays for efficient fault characterization in complex configuration spaces. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 32(1), 20-34. doi:10.1109/TSE.2006.8