Interventions for struggling adolescent and adult readers: Instructional, learner, and situational differences

Reading and Writing

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 489-494

  Calhoon, Mary Beth ^a   Scarborough, Hollis S ^b   Miller, Brett ^c  

^a LEHIGH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Haskins Laboraties   (United States)

^c EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH AND HUMAN DEVELOPMENT   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84876445695     PISSN: 09224777     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11145-013-9442-7     Document Type: Editorial

References (19)

1. Alamprese, J., MacArthur, C., Price, C., & Knight, D. (2011). Effects of a structured decoding curriculum on adult literacy learners' reading development. Journal of Research on Education Effectiveness, 4(2), 154-172.
2. Bottoms, G., & Timberlake, A. (2012). Improved middle grades schools for improved high school readiness: Ten best practices in the middle grades southern regional education board. http://www. sreb. org.
3. Calhoon, M. B. (2003). Reading achievement multi-component program (RAMP-UP). Unpublished adolescent remedial reading program.
4. Calhoon, M. B. (2005). Effects of a peer-mediated phonological skill and reading comprehension program on reading skill acquisition of middle school students with reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 424-433.
5. Calhoon, M. B., & Prescher, Y. (2013). Individual and group sensitivity to remedial reading program design: Examining reading gains across three middle school reading projects. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 1-28.
6. Calhoon, M. B., Sandow, A., & Hunter, V. (2010). Re-organizing the instructional reading components: Could there be a better way to modality remedial reading programs to maximize middle school students with reading disabilities' response to treatment? Annals of Dyslexia, 60, 57-85.
7. Greenberg, D. Wise, J., Frijters, J., & Morris, R. (2012). Persisters and nonpersisters: Identifying the characteristics of who stays and who leaves from adult literacy interventions. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal. doi: 10. 1007/s11145-012-9401-8.
8. Greenberg, D., Wise, J., Morris, R., Fredrick, L., Rodrigo, V., Nanda, Al, et al. (2011). A randomized-control study of instructional approaches for struggling adult readers. Journal of Research on Education Effectiveness, 42(2), 101-117.
9. International Adult Literacy Survey Institute. (2011). Retrieved from the website: http://www. statcan. gc. ca/pub/89-588-x/4152887-eng. htm on March 3, 2013.
10. Levenson, N. (2012). Boosting the quality and efficiency of special education. Thomas Fordham Institute, http://www. edexcellence. net.
11. Lovett, M. W., Lacerenza, L., Borden, S. L., Frijters, J. C., Steinbach, K. A., & De Palma, M. (2000). Components of effects remediation for developmental reading disabilities: Combining phonological and strategy-based instruction to improve outcomes. Journal of Educational Psycholody, 92(2), 263-283.
12. Mellard, D. F., Krieshok, T., Fall, E., & Woods, K. (2012). Dispositional factors affecting motivation during learning in adult basic and secondary education programs. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal. doi: 10. 1007/s11145-012-9413-4.
13. National Center for Education Statistics. (2013). Retrieved from website: http://nces. ed. gov/surveys/pirls/pirls2011. asp. 5 March 2013.
14. Sabatini, J., Shore, J., Holtzman, S., & Scarborough, H. (2011). Relative effectiveness of reading intervention programs for adults with low literacy. Journal of Research on Education Effectiveness, 2(2), 118-133.
15. Scarborough, H., Sabatini. J. P., Shore, J., Cutting, L. E., Pugh, K., & Katz, L. (2012). Meaningful reading gains by adult literacy learners. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal. doi: 10. 1007/s11145-012-9385-4.
16. Snyder, C. R., Harris, C., Anderson, J. R., Holleran, S. A., Irving, L. M., Sigmon, S. T., Harney, P. (1991). The will and the ways: Development and validation of an individual-differences measure of hope. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(4), 570-585.
17. Vaughn, S., Crinio, P. T., Wanzek, J., Wexler, J., Fletcher, J. M., Denton, C. D., et al. (2010). Response to intervention for middle school struggling readers: Effects of a primary and secondary intervention. School Psychology Review, 31, 2-21.
18. Vaughn, S., Wexler, J., Leroux, A., Roberts, G., Denton, C., Barth, A., & Fletcher, J. (2012). Effects of intensive reading intervention for eighth-grade students with persistently inadequate response to intervention. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45(6), 515-525. doi: 10. 1177/0022219411402692.
19. Vaughn, S., Wexler, J., Roberts, G., Bart, A., Cirino, P. T., Romain, M. A., Francia, D., Fletcher, J., & Denton, C. A. (2011). Effect of individualized and standardized interventions on middles school students with reading disabilities. Exceptional Children, 77(4), 391-407.