Sequencing batch-reactor control using Gaussian-process models

Bioresource Technology

Volumn 137, Issue , 2013, Pages 340-348

  Kocijan, Juš ^a,b   Hvala, Nadja ^a  

^a JO EF STEFAN INSTITUTE   (Slovenia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NOVA GORICA   (Slovenia)

Author keywords

Biological nitrogen removal; Pattern recognition; Real time control; Signal smoothing; Wastewater treatment

Indexed keywords

BIODEGRADATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PILOT PLANTS; REAL TIME CONTROL; REDOX REACTIONS; WASTEWATER TREATMENT;

BIODEGRADATION PROCESS; BIOLOGICAL NITROGEN REMOVAL; DISSOLVED OXYGEN CONCENTRATIONS; GAUSSIAN PROCESS MODELS; INDIRECT PROCESS; NITRATE CONCENTRATION; NON-PARAMETRIC MODEL; SIGNAL SMOOTHING;

ALGORITHMS;

AMMONIA; DISSOLVED OXYGEN; NITRATE;

ALGORITHM; BIOREACTOR; GAUSSIAN METHOD; NITROGEN; OPTIMIZATION; REAL TIME; WASTE TREATMENT; WASTEWATER;

ALGORITHM; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; BIODEGRADATION; ENERGY CONSUMPTION; GAUSSIAN PROCESS MODEL; OXIDATION REDUCTION POTENTIAL; PH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEQUENCING BATCH REACTOR; UNCERTAINTY; WASTE WATER MANAGEMENT;

EID: 84876430303     PISSN: 09608524     EISSN: 18732976     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.03.138     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Artan N., Wilderer P., Orhon D., Tasli R., Morgenroth E. Model evaluation and optimisation of nutrient removal potential for sequencing batch reactors. Water SA 2002, 28(4):423-432.
2. Ažman K., Kocijan J. Application of Gaussian processes for black-box modelling of biosystems. ISA Transactions 2007, 46:443-457.
3. Ciggin A.S., Insel G., Majone M., Orhon D. Respirometric evaluation and modelling of acetate utilization in sequencing batch reactor under pulse and continuous feeding. Bioresource Technology 2012, 107:61-69.
4. Coelho M.A.Z., Russo C., Araujo O.Q.F. Optimization of a sequencing batch reactor for biological nitrogen removal. Water Research 2000, 34(10):2809-2817.
5. Deisenroth M.P., Turner R.D., Huber M.F., Hanebeck U.D., Rasmussen C.E. Robust filtering and smoothing with Gaussian processes. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 2012, 57(7):1865-1871.
6. Dias A.M.A., Ferreira E.C. Computational intelligence techniques for supervision and diagnosis of biological wastewater treatment systems. Studies in Computational Intelligence 2009, vol. 218:127-162. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg. M. do Carmo Nicoletti, L.C. Jain (Eds.).
7. M. Ebden, A gentle introduction to Gaussian processes, report in two parts, Tech. Rep., University of Oxford, 2008. http://www.robots.ox.ac.uk/mebden/reports/GPtutorial.pdf.
8. Gao D., Peng Y., Li B., Liang H. Shortcut nitrification-denitrification by real-time control strategies. Bioresource Technology 2009, 100(7):2298-2300.
9. Gu S., Wang S., Yang Q., Yang P., Peng Y. Start up partial nitrification at low temperature with a real-time control strategy based on blower frequency and pH. Bioresource Technology 2012, 112:34-41.
10. Huang M., Wan J., Ma Y., Li W., Sun X., Wan Y. A fast predicting neural fuzzy model for on-line estimation of nutrient dynamics in an anoxic/oxic process. Bioresource Technology 2010, 101:1642-1651.
11. Jimenez-Hornero J.E., Santos-Duenas I.M., Garcia-Garcia I. Optimization of biotechnological processes. The acetic acid fermentation. Part II: Practical identifiability analysis and parameter estimation. Biochemical Engineering Journal 2009, 45:7-21.
12. Južnič-Žonta Živko, Kocijan J., Flotats X., Vrečko D. Multi-criteria analyses of wastewater treatment bio-processes under an uncertainty and a multiplicity of steady states. Water Research 2012, 46(18):6121-6131.
13. Kishida N., Kim J.-H., Chen M., Sasaki H., Sud R. Effectiveness of oxidation-reduction potential and pH as monitoring and control parameters for nitrogen removal in swine wastewater treatment by sequencing batch reactors. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering 2003, 96(3):285-290.
14. Marsili-Libelli S. Control of SBR switching by fuzzy pattern recognition. Water Research 2006, 40:1095-1107.
15. Marsili-Libelli S., Spagni A., Susini R. Intelligent monitoring system for long-term control of Sequencing Batch Reactors. Water Science & Technology 2008, 57(3):431-438.
16. Oppenheim A.V., Wilsky A.S., Hamid S. Signals and Systems 1996, Prentice Hall. second ed.
17. Pavšelj N., Hvala N., Kocijan J., Roš M., Šubelj M., Mušič G., Strmčnik S. Experimental design of an optimal phase duration control strategy used in batch biological wastewater treatment. ISA Transactions 2001, 40(1):41-56.
18. Rasmussen C., Williams C. Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning 2006, MIT Press.
19. Sottara D., Luccarini L., Mello P. AI techniques for waste water treatment plant control case study: denitrification in a pilot-scale SBR. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 2007, vol. 4692:639-646. Springer-Verlag. B. Apolloni, R. Howlett, L.C. Jain (Eds.).
20. Sottara D., Colombini G., Luccarini L., Mello P. A pool of experts to evaluate the evolution of biological processes in SBR plants. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 2009, vol. 5572:368-375. Springer-Verlag. E. Corchado, X. Wu, E. Oja, A. Herrero, B. Baruque (Eds.).
21. 2 statistic. Industrial Engineering and Chemistry Research 2010, 49:180-188.
22. Won S.G., Ra C.S. Biological nitrogen removal with a real-time control strategy using moving slope changes of pH(mV)- and ORP-time profiles. Water Research 2011, 45:171-178.
23. Yang Q., Gu S., Peng Y., Wang S., Liu X. Progress in the development of control strategies for the SBR process. Clean - Soil, Air, Water 2010, 38(8):732-749.