Multi-criteria analyses of wastewater treatment bio-processes under an uncertainty and a multiplicity of steady states

Water Research

Volumn 46, Issue 18, 2012, Pages 6121-6131

  Južnič Zonta, Živko ^a,b   Kocijan, Juš ^c,d   Flotats, Xavier ^a,b   Vrečko, Darko ^c  

^a GIRO Technological Centre   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE CATALUNYA   (Spain)

^c JO EF STEFAN INSTITUTE   (Slovenia)

^d UNIVERSITY OF NOVA GORICA   (Slovenia)

Author keywords

ADM; Co digestion; Expected utility; Gaussian process; Pareto front

Indexed keywords

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; DELTA MODULATION; GAUSSIAN DISTRIBUTION; GAUSSIAN NOISE (ELECTRONIC); MONTE CARLO METHODS; SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANTS; SUBSTRATES; WASTEWATER TREATMENT;

CODIGESTION; EXPECTED UTILITY; GAUSSIAN PROCESS REGRESSION; GAUSSIAN PROCESSES; MULTI-CRITERIA EVALUATION; MULTIPLICITY OF STEADY STATE; PARETO FRONT; WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS;

UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

BIOGAS;

ANOXIC CONDITIONS; BIOGAS; COMPLEXITY; DIGESTIBILITY; MONTE CARLO ANALYSIS; SUBSTRATE; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS; WASTEWATER; WATER TREATMENT;

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION; ARTICLE; BIOPROCESS; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STEADY STATE; WASTE WATER MANAGEMENT; WASTE WATER TREATMENT PLANT;

EID: 84867140467     PISSN: 00431354     EISSN: 18792448     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2012.08.035     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Bastone D.J., Keller J., Angelidaki I., Kalyuzhnyi S.V., Pavlostathis S.G., Rozzi A., Sanders W.T.M., Siegrist H., Vavilin V.A. (2002). Anaerobic Digestion Model No.1 (ADM1). IWA Scientific and Technical Report No. 13. IWA Publishing, UK.
2. Benedetti L., Baets B.D., Nopens I., Vanrolleghem P. Multi-criteria analysis of wastewater treatment plant design and control scenarios under uncertainty. Environmental Modelling & Software. 2010, 25(5):616-621.
3. Chen Y., Cheng J.J., Creamer K.S. Inhibition of anaerobic digestion process: a review. Bioresource Technology 2008, 99:4044-4064.
4. ®: a Simple Bifurcation Approach 2007, Springer, USA.
5. Flores-Alsina X., Rodríguez-Roda I., Sin G., Gernaey K.V. Multi-criteria evaluation of wastewater treatment plant control strategies under uncertainty. Water Research. 2008, 42(17):4485-4497.
6. Galí A., Benabdallah T., Astals S., Mata-Alvarez J. Modified version of ADM1 model for agro-waste application. Bioresource Technology. 2009, 100(11):2783-2790.
7. Gernaey K.V., Flores-Alsina X., Rosen C., Benedetti L., Jeppsson U. Dynamic influent pollutant disturbance scenario generation using a phenomenological modelling approach. Environmental Modelling & Software 2011, 26(11):1255-1267.
8. Hammersley J.M. Monte carlo methods for solving multivariable problems. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 1960, 86(3):844-874.
9. Henze M., Gujer W., Mino T., van Loosdrecht M. Activated Sludge Models ASM1, ASM2, ASM2d and ASM3 2000, IWA Publishing, London, UK.
10. Markowitz H.M. Portfolio selection. Journal of Financial. 1952, 7(1):77-91.
11. McLachlan G., Peel D. Finite Mixture Models 2000, John Wiley and Sons, USA.
12. Oakley J.E., O'Hagan A. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis of complex models: a Bayesian approach. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (Series B) 2004, 66(3):751-769.
13. O'Hagan A., Oakley J.E. Probability is perfect, but we can't elicit it perfectly. Reliability Engineering & System Safety. 2004, 85(1-3):239-248.
14. O'Hagan A. Curve fitting and optimal design for predictions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B 1978, 40(1):1-42.
15. Parmigiani G., Inoue L.Y.T. Decision Theory: Principles and Approaches 2009, John Wiley and Sons, USA.
16. Rasmussen C.E., Williams C.K.I. Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning 2006, The MIT Press, Cambridge, USA.
17. Rosen, C., Jeppsson, U. (2006). Aspects on ADM1 Implementation within the BSM2 Framework. Tech. Report. Department of Industrial Electrical Engineering and Automation, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
18. Rosen C., Vrečko D., Gernaey K.V., Pons M.-N., Jeppsson U. Implementing ADM1 for plant-wide benchmark simulations in Matlab/Simulink. Water Science and Technology. 2006, 54(4):11-19.
19. Rousseeuw P.J. Silhouettes: a graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis. Computational and Applied Mathematics 1987, 20(1):53-65.
20. Schreiber T., Schmitz A. Surrogate time series. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena. 2000, 142(3-4):346-382.
21. Sbarciog M., Loccufier M., Noldus E. Determination of appropriate operating strategies for anaerobic digestion systems. Biochemical Engineering Journal. 2010, 51(3):180-188.
22. Sin G., Gernaey K.V., Neumann M.B., van Loosdrecht M., Gujer W. Uncertainty analysis in WWTP model applications: a critical discussion using an example from design. Water Research. 2009, 43(11):2894-2906.
23. Sin G., Gernaey K.V., Neumann M.B., van Loosdrech M.C.M., Gujer W. Global sensitivity analysis in wastewater treatment plant model applications: prioritizing sources of uncertainty. Water Research 2011, 45:639-651.
24. Shen S., Premier G., Guwy A., Dinsdale R. Bifurcation and stability analysis of an anaerobic digestion model. Nonlinear Dynamics. 2007, 48(4):391-408.
25. Volcke E., Sbarciog M., Noldus E., Baets B.D., Loccufier M. Steady state multiplicity of two-step biological conversion systems with general kinetics. Mathematical Biosciences. 2010, 228(2):160-170.
26. Wang R., Diwekar U., Gragoire Padro C.E.G. Efficient sampling techniques for uncertainties in risk analysis. Environmental Progress 2004, 23(2):141-157.