Biological nitrogen removal with a real-time control strategy using moving slope changes of pH(mV)- and ORP-time profiles

Water Research

Volumn 45, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 171-178

  Won, S G ^a   Ra, C S ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b Kangwon National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Moving slope change (MSC); Oxidation reduction potential; PH(mV); Swine wastewater

Indexed keywords

BATCH REACTORS; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; NITROGEN REMOVAL; ORGANIC CARBON; PH EFFECTS; REDOX REACTIONS;

AEROBIC PHASIS; ANOXIC PHASIS; MOVING SLOPE CHANGE; OXIDATION-REDUCTION POTENTIALS; PH(MV); POTENTIAL-TIME; REAL-TIME CONTROL STRATEGY; SEQUENCING BATCH REACTORS; SLOPE CHANGE; SWINE WASTEWATER;

REAL TIME CONTROL;

NITROGEN;

LOADING; NITROGEN; OXIDATION; PH; REAL TIME; REDUCTION; TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; DENITRIFICATION; NITRIFICATION; OXIDATION REDUCTION POTENTIAL; PH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEQUENCING BATCH REACTOR; TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON; WASTE WATER;

SUIDAE;

EID: 78649683904     PISSN: 00431354     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2010.08.030     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. A.P.H.A Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater 1995, American Public Health Association, Washington, DC. tenth ed.
2. Akin B.S., Wgurlu A. Monitoring and control of biological nutrient removal in a sequencing batch reactor. Process Biochem. 2005, 40:2873-2878.
3. Bernet N., Delgenes N., Akunna J.C., Delgenes J.P., Moletta R. Combined anaerobic-aerobic SBR for the treatment of piggery wastewater. Water Res. 2000, 34:611-619.
4. Bicudo J.R., Svobada I.F. Intermittent aeration of pig slurry farm scale experiments for carbon and nitrogen removal. Water Sci. Technol. 1995, 32:83-90.
5. Bortone G., Malaspona F., Stane L., Tilche A. Biological nitrogen and phosphorus removal in an anaerobic/anoxic sequencing batch reactor with separated biofilm nitrification. Water Sci. Technol. 1994, 30:303-313.
6. Casellas M., Dagot C.M., Baudu M. Set up and assessment of a control strategy in a SBR in order to enhance nitrogen and phosphorus removal. Process Biochem. 2006, 41:1994-2001.
7. Chen K.C., Chen C.Y., Peng J.W., Houng J.Y. Real-time control of an immobilized-cell reactor for wastewater treatment using ORP. Water Res. 2002, 36:230-238.
8. Cheng J.Y., Liu B. Nitrification/denitrification in intermittent aeration process for swine wastewater treatment. J. Environ. Eng. 2001, 127:705-711.
9. Deng L.W., Zheng P., Chen Z., Mahmood Q. Improvement in post-treatment of digestion swine wastewater. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99:3136-3145.
10. Fernandes L., Mckyes E., Warith M., Barrington S. Treatment of liquid swine manure in the sequencing batch reactor under aerobic and anoxic condition. Can. Agr. Eng. 1991, 33:373-379.
11. Ga C.H., Ra C.S. Real-time control of oxic phase using pH(mV)-time profile in swine wastewater treatment. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 172:61-67.
12. Gao D., Peng Y., Li B., Liang H. Shortcut nitrification-denitrification by real-time control strategies. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100:2298-2300.
13. Ghaly A.E., Kok R. Nitrogen transformation in swine manure in an oxidation ditch under aerobic condition. Trans. ASAE 1986, 29:788-799.
14. Guo J., Yang Q., Peng Y., Yang A., Wang S. Biological nitrogen removal with real-time control using step-feed SBR technology. Enzym. Microb. Tech. 2007, 40:1564-1569.
15. Hao J.O., Kim H. pH and oxidation reduction potential (ORP) strategy for optimization of nutrient removal in an alternating aerobic-anoxic system. Water Environ. Res. 2000, 73(1):95-102.
16. Kameoka T., kagi T., Sakimoto M., Inno Y. Characteristics of concentrated wastewater treatment of swine by the rotating disc system. Jpn. J. Zootechnol. Sci. 1986, 57:209-215.
17. Kim J.H., Chen M., Kishida N., Sudo R. Integrated real-time control strategy for nitrogen removal in swine wastewater treatment using sequencing batch reactors. Water Res. 2004, 38:3340-3348.
18. Kim J.H., Guo X.J., Park H.S. Comparison study of the effects of temperature and free ammonia concentration on nitrification and nitrite accumulation. Process Biochem. 2008, 43:254-260.
19. Kishida N., Kim J.H., Chen M., Sasaki H., Sudo R. Effectiveness of oxidation-reduction potential and pH as monitoring and control parameters for nitrogen removal in swine wastewater treatment by sequencing batch reactors. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2003, 96:285-290.
20. Libelli S.M. Control of SBR switching by fuzzy pattern recognition. Water Res. 2006, 40:1095-1107.
21. Ndegwa P.M., Wang L., Vaddella V.K. Potential strategies for process control and monitoring of stabilization of dairy wastewater in batch aerobic treatment systems. Process Biochem. 2007, 42:1272-1278.
22. Obaja D., Mace S., Costa J., Sans C., Alvarez J.M. Nitrification, denitrification and biological phosphorus removal in piggery wastewater using a sequencing batch reactor. Bioresour. Technol. 2003, 87:103-111.
23. Osada T., Haga K., harada Y. Removal of nitrogen and phosphorus from swine wastewater by activated sludge units with the intermittent aeration process. Water Res. 1991, 25:1377-1388.
24. Pan P., Drapcho C.M. Biological anoxic/aerobic treatment of swine waste for reduction of organic carbon, nitrogen and odorous compounds. Trans. ASAE 2001, 44:1789-1796.
25. Pavselj N.H., Kocijan N.J., Ro M., Ubelj M., Mul G., Stmnik S. Experimental design of an optimal phase duration control strategy used in batch biological wastewater treatment. ISA Trans. 2001, 40:41-56.
26. Peddie C.C., Mavinic D.S., Jenkins C.J. Use of ORP for monitoring and control of aerobic sludge digestion. J. Environ. Eng. 1990, 116:461-471.
27. Pilsson S.S., Capdeville B., Mauret M., Deguin A., Baptiste P. Real-time control of nitrogen removal using three ORP bending points: signification, control strategy and results. Water Sci. Technol. 1996, 33:275-280.
28. Ra C.S., Lo K.V., Mavinic D.S. Swine wastewater treatment by a batch-mode 4-stage process: loading rate control using ORP. Environ. Technol. 1997, 18:615-622.
29. Ra C.S., Lo K.V., Mavinic D.S. Real-time control of two-stage sequencing batch reactor system for the treatment of animal wastewater. Environ. Technol. 1998, 19:343-356.
30. Ra C.S., Lo K.V., Mavinic D.S. Control of a swine manure treatment process using a specific feature of oxidation-reduction potential. Bioresour. Technol. 1999, 70:117-127.
31. Ra C.S., Lo K.V., Shin J.S., Oh J.S., Hong B.J. Biological nutrient removal with internal organic carbon source in piggery wastewater treatment. Water Res. 2000, 34:965-973.
32. Su J.J., Kung C.M., Lin J., Lian W.C., Wu J.F. Utilization of sequencing batch reactor in situ piggery wastewater treatment. J. Environ. Sci. Heal. A 1997, 32:391-405.
33. Tanwar P., Tapas N., Pallavi U., Pravin M. Correlating on-line monitoring parameters, pH, DO and ORP with nutrient removal in an intermittent cyclic process bioreactor system. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99:7630-7635.
34. Wang Y., Peng Y., Stephenson T. Effect of influent nutrient ratio and hydraulic retention time (HRT) on simultaneous phosphorus and nitrogen removal in a two-sludge sequencing batch reactor process. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100:3506-3512.
35. Wareham D.G., Hall K.J., Mavinic D.S. Real-time control of aerobic-anoxic sludge digestion using ORP. J. Environ. Eng. 1993, 119:120-136.
36. Yu R.F., Liaw S.L., Chang C.N., Lu H.J., Cheng W.Y. Monitoring and control using on-line ORP on the continuous-flow activated sludge batch reactor system. Water Sci. Technol. 1997, 35:57-66.
37. Zeng W., Zhang Y., Peng Y.Z., Wang S.Y. Control and optimization of nitrifying communities for nitrification from domestic wastewater at room temperatures. Enzym. Microb. Tech. 2009, 45:226-232.