Hardt and Negri and the Geo-Political Imagination: Empire, Multitude and Critical Disability Studies

Critical Sociology

Volumn 39, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 369-384

  Goodley, Dan ^a   Lawthom, Rebecca ^a  

^a MANCHESTER METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

disability; Empire; families; Global North; Global South; multitude

Indexed keywords

EID: 84876428229     PISSN: 08969205     EISSN: 15691632     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0896920511431500     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Abbinnett R.Untimely agitations: Derrida, Klein and Hardt and Negri on the idea of Capitalism.Journal for Cultural Research. 2007;11 (1): 41-56.
2. Balakrishnan G.Virgilian visions: Review of Hardt and Negri's.Empire. New Left Review. 2000;5 (Sept/Oct): 142-148.
3. Bradbury J,Ndlovu S.Dangerous liaisons: Ties that bind and lines that divide. Seminar presentation to the Discourse Unit; 2009Manchester Metropolitan University; 2009.
4. Braidotti RNomadic Subjects: Embodiment and Sexual Difference in Contemporary Feminist Theory. New York: Columbia University Press; 1994:.
5. Braidotti RTranspositions: On Nomadic Ethics. Cambridge: Polity; 2006:.
6. Browning G.A globalist ideology of Post-Marxism? Hardt and Negri's Empire.Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy. 2005;8 (2): 193-208.
7. Campbell FKContours of Ableism: Territories, Objects, Disability and Desire. London: Palgrave Macmillan; 2009:.
8. Chaudhry V.Disability in India: Neoliberal state and personhood. Paper presented to the Society for Disability Studies conference; 2010Temple University; 2010.
9. Clough PT.Affect and control: rethinking the body 'beyond sex and gender'.Feminist Theory. 2003;4 (3): 359-364.
10. Fanon FWretched of the Earth. London: Penguin; 1976:.
11. Goodley D.Becoming rhizomatic parents: Deleuze, Guattari and disabled babies.Disability & Society. 2007;22 (2): 145-160.
12. Goodley D.Bringing the psyche back into disability studies: the case of the body with/out organs.Journal of Cultural and Literary Disability Studies. 2009;3 (3): 257-272.
13. Goodley DDisability Studies: An Interdisciplinary Introduction. London: Sage; 2011:.
14. Goodley D,Lawthom R.Disability, community and empire: indigenous psychologies and social psychoanalytic possibilities.International Journal of Inclusive Education. 2011;15 (1): 101-115.
15. Goodley D,Runswick-Cole K.Emancipating play: dis/abled children, development and deconstruction.Disability & Society. 2010;25 (4): 499-512.
16. Grech S.Disability, poverty and development: critical reflections on the majority world debate.Disability & Society. 2009;24 (6): 771-784.
17. GrechS (2011) Disability in the folds of poverty: exploring connections and transitions in Guatemala. Manchester Metropolitan University: unpublished PhD thesis.
18. Hardt M,Negri AEmpire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 2000:.
19. Hardt M,Negri AMultitude: War and Democracy in the Age of Empire. London: Penguin; 2004:.
20. Hochschild ARThe Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press; 1983:.
21. Lash S.Technological forms of life.Theory, Culture and Society. 2001;18 (1): 105-120.
22. McLaughlin J,Goodley D,Clavering E,Fisher TFamilies Raising Disabled Children: Enabling Care and Social Justice. London: Palgrave; 2008:.
23. Meekosha H. Keynote presentation, Disability Studies Association 4th conference; 2008Lancaster; 2008.
24. Meekosha H.A Southern perspective on disability: a paradigm shift incorporating the geo-politics of the periphery and prevention of mass impairment. Paper presented at the Society for Disability Studies conference; 2010Temple University; 2010.
25. Meekosha H.Decolonising disability: thinking and acting globally.Disability & Society. 2011;26 (6): 667-682.
26. Oliver MThe Politics of Disablement. Basingstoke: Macmillan; 1990:.
27. O'Neill J.Empire versus Empire: a post-Communist manifesto.Theory, Culture and Society. 2002;19 (4): 195-210.
28. Okur MA.Rethinking Empire after 9/11: towards a new ontological image of world order.Perceptions. 2007;:61-93.
29. OttoD (1999) Everything is dangerous: some poststructural tools for rethinking the universal knowledge claims of human rights law. Australian Journal of Human Rights17(5): 1-25. Available (accessed 15 >September 2009) at: http://www.austlii.edu.ac/ac/journals/AJHR/.
30. Rose N.The politics of life itself.Theory, Culture & Society. 2001;18 (6): 1-30.
31. Runswick-Cole K.Living with dying and disablism: time to talk about death.Disability and Society. 2010;25 (7): 813-826.
32. Runswick-Cole K,Goodley D.Problematising policy: conceptions of 'child', 'disabled' and 'parents' in social policy in England.International Journal of Inclusive Education. 2011;15 (1): 71-85.
33. Rustin M.Empire: A postmodern theory of revolution.New Political Economy. 2002;7 (3): 451-462.
34. Sampson EE.The debate on individualism: indigenous psychologies of the individual and their role in personal and societal functioning.American Psychologist. 1988;43 (1): 15-22.
35. Thomas CSociologies of Disability, 'Impairment', and Chronic Illness: Ideas in Disability Studies and Medical Sociology. London: Palgrave; 2007:.
36. Tregaskis C.Identity, positionality and power: issues for disabled researchers. A response paper to Broun and Heshusius.Disability Studies Quarterly. 2004;24 (2):.
37. Vulliamy E.Empire hits back.Observer. 2001;:.
38. Žižek SViolence. London: Profile; 2008:.