Effectiveness of a Forward Collision Warning System in simple and in dual task from an electrophysiological perspective

Neuroscience Letters

Volumn 541, Issue , 2013, Pages 219-223

  Bueno, Mercedes ^a,b,c   Fort, Alexandra ^a,b   Francois, Mathilde ^b   Ndiaye, Daniel ^d   Deleurence, Philippe ^a,b   Fabrigoule, Colette ^c  

^a Cité des Mobilités   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE LYON   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE BORDEAUX   (France)

^d INRETS   (France)

Author keywords

Anticipation; Cognitive distraction; Event related potential; Forward Collision Warning System

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CAR DRIVER; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; EYE MOVEMENT; FORWARD COLLISION WARNING SYSTEM; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBLEM SOLVING; RECORDING; SIMULATOR; TECHNOLOGY;

ADULT; ATTENTION; AUTOMOBILE DRIVING; BEHAVIOR; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EVOKED POTENTIALS; HUMANS; MALE; PROTECTIVE DEVICES; REACTION TIME;

EID: 84876417797     PISSN: 03043940     EISSN: 18727972     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2013.02.030     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Abe G., Richardson J. The effect of alarm timing on driver behaviour: an investigation of differences in driver trust and response to alarms according to alarm timing. Transp. Res. Part F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 2004, 7:307-322.
2. Aguera P.E., Jerbi K., Caclin A., Bertrand O. Elan A software package for analysis and visualization of MED, EEG, and LFP signals. Comput. Intell. Neurosci. 2011, 2011:1-11.
3. Baddeley A.D. Exploring the central executive. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 1996, 49A:5-28.
4. Bliss J.P., Acton S.A. Alarm mistrust in automobiles: how collision alarm reliability affects driving. Appl. Ergon. 2003, 34:499-509.
5. Braver T.S., Barch D.M. A theory of cognitive control, aging cognition, and neuromodulation. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2002, 26:809-817.
6. Bruyas M.P., Chapon A., Lelekov-Boissard T., Letisserand D., Duraz M., Aillerie I. Evaluation de l'impact de communications vocales sur la conduite automobile. Recherche Transports Sécurité 2006, 91:99-119.
7. Bueno M., Fabrigoule C., Deleurence P., Ndiaye D., Fort A. An electrophysiological study of the impact of a Forward Collision Warning System in a simulator driving task. Brain Res. 2012, 1470:69-79.
8. COMSIS Corporation, Preliminary Human Factors Guidelines for Crash Avoidance Warning Devices COMSIS, 1996.
9. Folstein J.R., Van Petten C. Influence of cognitive control and mismatch on the N2 component of the ERP: a review. Psychophysiology 2008, 45:152-170.
10. Fort A., Collette B., Bueno M., Deleurence P., Bonnard A. Impact of totally and partially predictive alert in distracted and undistracted subjects: an event related potential study. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2013, 50:578-586.
11. Guerri E., Eimer M. Active listening impairs visual perception and selectivity: an ERP study of auditory dual-task costs on visual attention. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2011, 23:832-844.
12. Hackley S.A., Valle-Inclán F. Which stages of processing are speeded by a warning signal?. Biol. Psychol. 2003, 64:27-45.
13. Ho C., Reed N., Spence C. Assessing the effectiveness of intuitive vibrotactile warning signals in preventing front-to-rear-end collisions in a driving simulator. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2006, 38:988-996.
14. Ho C., Reed N., Spence C. Multisensory in-car warning signals for collision avoidance. Hum. Factors 2007, 49:1107-1114.
15. Ho C., Spence C. Using peripersonal warning signals to orient a driver's Gaze. Hum. Factors 2009, 51:539-556.
16. Knipling R.R., Wang J.S., Yin H.M. Rear-end crashes: problem size assessment and statistical description 1993, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC.
17. Lee J.D., McGehee D.V., Brown T.L., Reyes M.L. Collision warning timing, driver distraction, and driver response to imminent rear-end collisions in a high-fidelity driving simulator. Hum. Factors 2002, 44:314-334.
18. Lee J.D., Ries M.L., McGehee D.V., Brown T.L., Perel M. Can Collision Warning Systems Mitigate Distraction Due to In-Vehicle Devices? 2000, NHTSA Driver Distraction Internet Forum, Rockville, Maryland.
19. Luck S.J. An introduction to the Event-Related Potential technique 2005, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachussetts.
20. Maltz M., Shinar D. Imperfect in-vehicle collision avoidance warning systems can aid distracted drivers. Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 2007, 10:345-357.
21. Mednick S.A. The associative basis of the creative process. Psychol. Rev. 1962, 69:220-232.
22. Mohebbi R., Gray R., Tan H.Z. Driver Reaction Time to Tactile and Auditory Rear-End Collision Warnings While Talking on a Cell Phone. Hum. Factors 2009, 51:102-110.
23. Polich J., Updating P300: an integrative theory of P3a and P3b. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2007, 118:2128-2148.
24. M.E. Rakauskas, N.J., Ward, E.M., Bernat, M., Cadwallader, C.J., Patrick, D. de Waard, Psychophysiological measures of driver distraction and workload while intoxicated 3rd International Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training, and Vehicle Design, Rockport, Maine, 2005.
25. Rudell A.P., Hu B. Does a warning signal accelerate the processing of sensory information? Evidence from recognition potential responses to high and low frequency words. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 2001, 41:31-42.
26. Santangelo V., Van der Lubbe R., Olivetti Belardinelli M., Postma A. Multisensory integration affects ERP components elicited by exogenous cues. Exp. Brain Res. 2008, 185:269-277.
27. United Nations Guidelines on establishing requirements for high-priority warning signals 2011, Economic Commission for Europe, Geneva.
28. Vogel E.K., Luck S.J. The visual N1 component as an index of a discrimination process. Psychophysiology 2000, 37:190-203.
29. Wickens C. The structure of attentional resources. Attention and Performance 1980, 239-257. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. R. Nickerson (Ed.).