Utilization of and charges for robotic versus laparoscopic versus open surgery for endometrial cancer

Journal of Surgical Oncology

Volumn 107, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 653-658

  Yu, Xinhua ^a   Lum, Deirdre ^b   Kiet, Tuyen K ^b   Fuh, Katherine C ^b   Orr, James ^c   Brooks, Rebecca A ^b   Ueda, Stefanie M ^b   Chen, Lee May ^b   Kapp, Daniel S ^d   Chan, John K ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c Florida Society of Gynecologic Oncologists   (United States)

^d STANFORD CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

hysterectomy; laparoscopic surgery; laparotomy; minimally invasive surgical procedures; robotic surgery

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER SURGERY; ENDOMETRIUM CANCER; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION; HOSPITAL CHARGE; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OPEN SURGERY; OPERATING ROOM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ROBOTIC SURGERY;

EID: 84876386935     PISSN: 00224790     EISSN: 10969098     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jso.23275     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, et al.: Cancer statistics, 2010. CA Cancer J Clin 2010; 60: 277-300.
2. Ueda SM, Kapp DS, Cheung MK, et al.: Trends in demographic and clinical characteristics in women diagnosed with corpus cancer and their potential impact on the increasing number of deaths. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 198: 218 e1-218 e6.
3. Walker JL, Piedmonte MR, Spirtos NM, et al.: Laparoscopy compared with laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group Study LAP2. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27: 5331-5336.
4. Bell MC, Torgerson J, Seshadri-Kreaden U, et al.: Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques. Gynecol Oncol 2008; 111: 407-411.
5. Veljovich DS, Paley PJ, Drescher CW, et al.: Robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology: Program initiation and outcomes after the first year with comparison with laparotomy for endometrial cancer staging. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 198: 679 e1-679 e9, discussion 679 e9-10.
6. Lowe MP, Johnson PR, Kamelle SA, et al.: A multiinstitutional experience with robotic-assisted hysterectomy with staging for endometrial cancer. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 114: 236-243.
7. Boggess JF, Gehrig PA, Cantrell L, et al.: A case-control study of robot-assisted type III radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection compared with open radical hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 199: 357 e1-357 e7.
8. Elkin EB, Bach PB:, Cancer's next frontier: Addressing high and increasing costs. JAMA 2010; 303: 1086-1087.
9. Barnett JC, Judd JP, Wu JM, et al.: Cost comparison among robotic, laparoscopic, and open hysterectomy for endometrial: Cancer. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 116: 685-693.
10. Holtz DO, Miroshnichenko G, Finnegan MO, et al.: Endometrial cancer surgery costs: Robot vs laparoscopy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2010; 17: 500-503.
11. Hu JC, Gu X, Lipsitz SR, et al.: Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive vs open radical prostatectomy. JAMA 2009; 302: 1557-1564.
12. Carreyrou J:, Surgical robot examined in injuries. Wall Street J 2010; A1.
13. Kokoska ER, Bird TM, Robbins JM, et al.: Racial disparities in the management of pediatric appenciditis. J Surg Res 2007; 137: 83-88.
14. Hagendorf BA, Liao JG, Price MR, et al.: Evaluation of race and insurance status as predictors of undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy in children. Ann Surg 2007; 245: 118-125.
15. Chan JK, Zhang M, Hu JM, et al.: Racial disparities in surgical treatment and survival of epithelial.: States. J Surg Oncol 2008; 97: 103-107.
16. Lee NK, Cheung MK, Shin JY:, et al.: Prognostic factors for uterine cancer in reproductive-aged women. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 109: 655-662.
17. Hamilton CA, Cheung MK, Osann K, et al.: Uterine papillary serous and clear cell carcinomas predict for poorer survival compared to grade 3 endometrioid corpus cancers. Br J Cancer 2006; 94: 642-646.
18. Chan JK, Wu H, Cheung MK, et al.: The outcomes of 27,063 women with unstaged endometrioid uterine cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2007; 106: 282-288.
19. Hill HA, Eley JW, Harlan LC, et al.: Racial differences in endometrial cancer survival: The black/white cancer survival study. Obstet Gynecol 1996; 88: 919-926.
20. Ferguson SE, Olshen AB, Levine DA, et al.: Molecular profiling of endometrial cancers from African-American and Caucasian women. Gynecol Oncol 2006; 101: 209-213.
21. duPont NC, Chandrasekhar R, Wilding G, et al.: Current trends in robot assisted surgery: A survey of gynecologic oncologists. Int J Med Robot 2010; 6: 468-472.
22. Bristow RE, Zahurak ML, Diaz-Montes TP, et al.: Impact of surgeon and hospital ovarian cancer surgical case volume on in-hospital mortality and related short-term outcomes. Gynecol Oncol 2009; 115: 334-338.
23. Bristow RE, Palis BE, Chi DS, et al.: The National Cancer Database report on advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer: Impact of hospital surgical case volume on overall survival and surgical treatment paradigm. Gynecol Oncol 2010; 118: 262-267.
24. Herron DM, Marohn M:, A consensus document on robotic surgery. Surg Endosc 2008; 22: 313-325, discussion 311-2.
25. Oppenheimer P, Weghorst S, MacFarlane M, et al.: Immersive surgical robotic interfaces. Stud Health Technol Inform 1999; 62: 242-248.
26. Berguer R, Forkey DL, Smith WD:, Ergonomic problems associated with laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 1999; 13: 466-468.
27. Stylopoulos N, Rattner D:, Robotics and ergonomics. Surg Clin North Am 2003; 83: 1321-1337.
28. Sroga J, Patel SD, Falcone T:, Robotics in reproductive medicine. Front Biosci 2008; 13: 1308-1317.
29. Venkat P, Chen LM, Young-Lin N, et al.: An economic analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: Costs, charges and reimbursements to hospitals and professionals. Gynecol Oncol 2012; 125: 237-240.
30. Barbash GI, Glied SA:, New technology and health care costs-The case of robot-assisted surgery. N Engl J Med 2010; 363: 701-704.