Current trends in robot assisted surgery: A survey of gynecologic oncologists

International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery

Volumn 6, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 468-472

  Dupont, Nefertiti C ^a   Chandrasekhar, Rameela ^b   Wilding, Gregory ^b   Guru, Khurshid A ^a  

^a ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

Author keywords

gynecologic oncology; robot assisted surgery; survey

Indexed keywords

DISEASES; FELT; LAPAROSCOPY; ONCOLOGY; ROBOTIC SURGERY; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT;

'CURRENT; CAREER GOALS; ENDOMETRIAL CANCER; GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; RESPONSE RATE; ROBOT-ASSISTED SURGERY; ROBOTICS SURGERY; SURGICAL TRAINING; WEB-BASED SURVEYS;

SURVEYS;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CANCER STAGING; CANCER SURGERY; CAREER; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; E-MAIL; ENDOMETRIUM CANCER; FEMALE; GOLD STANDARD; GYNECOLOGIC CANCER; GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY; HEALTH INSURANCE; HUMAN; HYSTERECTOMY; INTERNET; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LYMPH NODE DISSECTION; MALE; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; ONCOLOGY; PERCEPTION; QUESTIONNAIRE; REIMBURSEMENT; ROBOTICS; SALPINGOOOPHORECTOMY; SURGEON; SURGICAL TRAINING; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER; VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY;

EID: 78649709210     PISSN: 14785951     EISSN: 1478596X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/rcs.357     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Nezhat C, Lavie O, Lemyre M, et al., Laparoscopic hysterectomy with and without a robot: Stanford experience. J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 2009; 3 (2): 125-128.
2. Seamon LG, Cohn DE, Henretta MS, et al., Minimally invasive comprehensive surgical staging for endometrial cancer: Robotics or laparoscopy? Gynecol Oncol 2009; 113: 36.
3. Palomba S, Falbo A, Mocciaro R, et al., Laparoscopic treatment for endometrial cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Gynecol Oncol 2009; 112 (2): 415-421.
4. Mabrouk M, Frumovitz M, Greer M, et al., Trends in laparoscopic and robotic surgery among gynecologic oncologists: a survey update. Gynecol Oncol 2009; 112 (3): 501-505.
5. Estape R, Lambrou N, Diaz R, et al., A case matched analysis of robotic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy compared with laparoscopy and laparotomy. Gynecol Oncol 2009; 113 (3): 357-361.
6. Cantrell LA, Mendivil A, Gehrig PA, Boggess JF,. Survival outcomes for women undergoing type III robotic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a 3-year experience. Gynecol Oncol 2010; 117 (2): 260-265.
7. Nezhat FR, Datta MS, Liu C, et al., Robotic radical hysterectomy versus total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for treatment of early cervical cancer. J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 2008; 12 (3): 227-237.
8. Bandera CA, Magrina JF,. Robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2009; 21 (1): 25-30.
9. Bell MC, Torgerson J, Seshadri-Kreaden U, et al., Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques. Gynecol Oncol 2008; 111 (3): 407-411.
10. Boggess JF,. Robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology: evolution of a new surgical paradigm. J Robotic Surg 2007; 1: 31-37.
11. Boggess JF, Gehrig PA, Cantrell L, et al., A comparative study of 3 surgical methods for hysterectomy with staging for endometrial cancer: robotic assistance, laparoscopy, laparotomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 199 (4): 360.e1-360.e9.
12. Boggess JF, Gehrig PA, Cantrell L, et al., A case-control study of robot-assisted type III radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection compared with open radical hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 199 (4): 357.e1-357.e7.
13. Magrina JF, Kho RM, Weaver AL, et al., Robotic radical hysterectomy: comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy. Gynecol Oncol 2008; 109 (1): 86-91.
14. Nezhat C, Lavie O, Lemyre M, et al., Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery in gynecology: Scientific dream or reality? Fertil Steril 2009; 91 (6): 2620-2622.
15. Nezhat F,. Minimally invasive surgery in gynecologic oncology: Laparoscopy versus robotics. Gynecol Oncol 2008; 111 (2 Suppl): S29-S32.
16. Kornblith AB, Huang HQ, Walker JL, et al., Quality of life of patients with endometrial cancer undergoing laparoscopic international federation of gynecology and obstetrics staging compared with laparotomy: a gynecologic oncology group study. J Clin Oncol 2009; 10; 27 (32): 5337-5342.
17. Cardenas-Goicoechea J, Adams S, Bhat SB, Randall TC,. Surgical outcomes of robotic-assisted surgical staging for endometrial cancer are equivalent to traditional laparoscopic staging at a minimally invasive surgical center. Gynecol Oncol 2010; 117 (2): 224-228.
18. Mettler L, Schollmeyer T, Boggess JF, et al., Robotic assistance in gynecological oncology. Curr Opin Oncol 2008; 20: 581-589.
19. Guru KA, Hussain A, Chandrasekhar R, et al., Current status of robot-assisted surgery in urology: a multi-national survey of 297 urologic surgeons. Can J Urol 2009; 16 (4): 4736-4741; discussion 4741.
20. Lowe MP, Chamberlain DH, Kamelle SA, et al., A multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2009; 113 (2): 191-194.
21. Visco AG, Advincula AP,. Robotic gynecologic surgery. Obstet Gynecol 2008; 112 (6): 1369-1384.
22. Lee PS, Bland A, Valea FA, et al., Robotic-assisted laparoscopic gynecologic procedures in a fellowship training program. J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 2009; 13 (4): 467-472.
23. Frumovitz M, Ramirez PT, Greer M, et al., Laparoscopic training and practice in gynecologic oncology among society of gynecologic oncologists members and fellows-in-training. Gynecol Oncol 2004; 94 (3): 746-753.
24. Cook C, Heath F, Thompson RL,. A meta-analysis of response rates in web or internet based surveys. Educ Psychol Measure 2000; 60 (6): 821. Available from