Structure-function relationship among three types of spectral-domain optical coherent tomography instruments in measuring parapapillary retinal nerve fibre layer thickness

Acta Ophthalmologica

Volumn 91, Issue 3, 2013, Pages

  Kanamori, Akiyasu ^a   Nakamura, Makoto ^a   Tomioka, Mari ^a   Kawaka, Yuki ^a   Yamada, Yuko ^a   Negi, Akira ^a  

^a KOBE UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

Author keywords

retinal nerve fibre layer thickness; spectral domain optical coherence tomography; structure function relationship; visual field

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; HUMAN; IMAGING SYSTEM; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PERIMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINAL NERVE FIBER LAYER THICKNESS; SPECTRAL DOMAIN OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL FIELD SENSITIVITY;

ADULT; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA, OPEN-ANGLE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NERVE FIBERS; OPTIC DISK; OPTIC NERVE DISEASES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETINAL GANGLION CELLS; TOMOGRAPHY, OPTICAL COHERENCE; VISION DISORDERS; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL FIELD TESTS; VISUAL FIELDS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84876372225     PISSN: 1755375X     EISSN: 17553768     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/aos.12028     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Anderson DR, &, Patella VM, (1999): Automated static perimetry. St. Louis. Mosby.
2. Aptel F, Sayous R, Fortoul V, et al., (2010): Structure-function relationships using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography: comparison with scanning laser polarimetry. Am J Ophthalmol 150: 825-833.
3. Bengtsson B, Andersson S, &, Heijl A, (2012): Performance of time-domain and spectral-domain Optical Coherence Tomography for glaucoma screening. Acta Ophthalmol 90: 310-315.
4. Cho JW, Sung KR, Lee S, et al., (2010): Relationship between visual field sensitivity and macular ganglion cell complex thickness as measured by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 51: 6401-6407.
5. Cohen J, (1977): Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York. Academic Press.
6. Dichtl A, Jonas JB, &, Naumann GO., (1999): Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in human eyes. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 237: 474-479.
7. Garway-Heath DF, Holder GE, Fitzke FW, et al., (2002): Relationship between electrophysiological, psychophysical, and anatomical measurements in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43: 2213-2220.
8. Harwerth RS, Wheat JL, Fredette MJ, et al., (2010): Linking structure and function in glaucoma. Prog Retin Eye Res 29: 249-271.
9. Hood DC, &, Kardon RH, (2007): Framework for comparing structural and functional measures of glaucomatous damage. Prog Retin Eye Res 26: 688-710.
10. Hood DC, Anderson SC, Wall M, et al., (2007): Structure versus function in glaucoma: an application of a linear model. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 48: 3662-3668.
11. Hood DC, Raza AS, Kay KY, et al., (2009): A comparison of retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness obtained with frequency and time domain optical coherence tomography (OCT). Opt Express 17: 3997-4003.
12. Hougaard JL, Heijl A, &, Bengtsson B, (2008): Glaucomatous retinal nerve fibre layer defects may be identified in Stratus OCT images classified as normal. Acta Ophthalmol 86: 569-575.
13. Kanamori A, Escano MF, Eno A, et al., (2003): Evaluation of the effect of aging on retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measured by optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmologica 217: 273-278.
14. Kanamori A, Naka M, Nagai-Kusuhara A, et al., (2008): Regional relationship between retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and corresponding visual field sensitivity in glaucomatous eyes. Arch Ophthalmol 126: 1500-1506.
15. Kanamori A, Nakamura M, Tomioka M, et al., (2012): Agreement among three types of spectral-domain optical coherent tomography instruments in measuring parapapillary retinal nerve fibre layer thickness. Br J Ophthalmol 96: 832-837.
16. Kass MA, Heuer DK, Higginbotham EJ, et al., (2002): The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: a randomized trial determines that topical ocular hypotensive medication delays or prevents the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 120: 701-713.
17. Kim NR, Lee H, Lee ES, et al., (2012): Influence of Cataract on Time Domain and Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Measurements. J Glaucoma 21: 116-122.
18. Knighton RW, &, Qian C, (2000): An optical model of the human retinal nerve fiber layer: implications of directional reflectance for variability of clinical measurements. J Glaucoma 9: 56-62.
19. Lee JR, Jeoung JW, Choi J, et al., (2010): Structure-function relationships in normal and glaucomatous eyes determined by time- and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 51: 6424-6430.
20. Leite MT, Rao HL, Weinreb RN, et al., (2011): Agreement among spectral-domain optical coherence tomography instruments for assessing retinal nerve fiber layer thickness. Am J Ophthalmol: 85-92 151: 85-92 e81.
21. Leung CK, Chong KK, Chan WM, et al., (2005): Comparative study of retinal nerve fiber layer measurement by StratusOCT and GDx VCC, II: structure/function regression analysis in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 46: 3702-3711.
22. Leung CK, Liu S, Weinreb RN, et al., (2011): Evaluation of retinal nerve fiber layer progression in glaucoma a prospective analysis with neuroretinal rim and visual field progression. Ophthalmology 118: 1551-1557.
23. Parikh RS, Parikh SR, Sekhar GC, et al., (2007): Normal age-related decay of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness. Ophthalmology 114: 921-926.
24. Rao HL, Zangwill LM, Weinreb RN, et al., (2011): Structure-function relationship in glaucoma using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Arch Ophthalmol 129: 864-871.
25. Shah NN, Bowd C, Medeiros FA, et al., (2006): Combining structural and functional testing for detection of glaucoma. Ophthalmology 113: 1593-1602.
26. Sung KR, Wollstein G, Schuman JS, et al., (2009): Scan quality effect on glaucoma discrimination by glaucoma imaging devices. Br J Ophthalmol 93: 1580-1584.
27. Takagishi M, Hirooka K, Baba T, et al., (2011): Comparison of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurements using time domain and spectral domain optical coherence tomography, and visual field sensitivity. J Glaucoma 20: 383-387.
28. Wu Z, Huang J, Dustin L, et al., (2009): Signal strength is an important determinant of accuracy of nerve fiber layer thickness measurement by optical coherence tomography. J Glaucoma 18: 213-216.