Scan quality effect on glaucoma discrimination by glaucoma imaging devices

British Journal of Ophthalmology

Volumn 93, Issue 12, 2009, Pages 1580-1584

  Sung, K R ^a   Wollstein, G ^a   Schuman, Joel S ^a   Bilonick, R A ^a   Ishikawa, H ^a   Townsend, K A ^a   Kagemann, L ^a   Gabriele, M L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONFOCAL LASER MICROSCOPY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ETHNICITY; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGING SYSTEM; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPTIC NERVE FIBER; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; PARAMETER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCANNING LASER OPHTHALMOSCOPY; THICKNESS;

ADULT; AGED; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OPHTHALMOSCOPY; SCANNING LASER POLARIMETRY; TOMOGRAPHY, OPTICAL COHERENCE; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 72449128550     PISSN: 00071161     EISSN: 14682079     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2008.152223     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Miglior S, Guareschi M, Albe E, et al. Detection of glaucomatous visual field changes using the Moorfields regression analysis of the Heidelberg retina tomograph. Am J Ophthalmol 2003;136:26-33. (Pubitemid 36794491)
2. Sihota R, Sony P, Gupta V, et al. Diagnostic capability of optical coherence tomography in evaluating the degree of glaucomatous retinal nerve fiber damage. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006;47:2006-2010 (Pubitemid 46768282)
3. Medeiros FA, Zangwill LM, Bowd C, et al. Comparison of the GDx VCC scanning laser polarimeter, HRT II confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope, and stratus OCT optical coherence tomograph for the detection of glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 2004;122:827-837
4. Wollstein G, Schuman JS, Price LL, et al. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) macular and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer measurements and automated visual fields. Am J Ophthalmol 2004;138:218-225 (Pubitemid 39037425)
5. Jeoung JW, Park KH, Kim TW, et al. Diagnostic ability of optical coherence tomography with a normative database to detect localized retinal nerve fiber layer defects. Ophthalmology 2005;112:2157-2163 (Pubitemid 41720995)
6. Stein DM, Wollstein G, Ishikawa H, et al. Effect of corneal drying on optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology 2006;113:985-991 (Pubitemid 43810157)
7. Medeiros FA, Zangwill LM, Bowd C, et al. Influence of disease severity and optic disc size on the diagnostic performance of imaging instruments in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006;47:1008-1015 (Pubitemid 46768333)
8. Stein DM, Ishikawa H, Hariprasad R, et al. A new quality assessment parameter for optical coherence tomography. Br J Ophthalmol 2006;90:186-190 (Pubitemid 43163849)
9. Sadda SR, Wu Z, Walsh AC, et al. Errors in retinal thickness measurements obtained by optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology 2006;113:285-293 (Pubitemid 43170778)
10. Ray R, Stinnett SS, Jaffe GJ. Evaluation of image artifact produced by optical coherence tomography of retinal pathology. Am J Ophthalmol 2005;139:18-29. (Pubitemid 40094836)
11. Strouthidis NG, White ET, Owen VM, et al. Factors affecting the test-retest variability of Heidelberg retina tomograph and Heidelberg retina tomograph II measurements. Br J Ophthalmol 2005;89:1427-1432 (Pubitemid 41527375)
12. Zangwill L, Irak I, Berry CC, et al. Effect of cataract and pupil size on image quality with confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy. Arch Ophthalmol 1997;115:983-990 (Pubitemid 27328486)
13. Anon. GDx-VCC operation manual. San Diego: Lase Diagnostics Technologies, 2006.
14. Anon. Glaucoma module Heidelberg retina tomograph operating instructions software version 3.0. Heidelberg: Heidelberg Engineering, 2005.
15. Anon. StratusOCT user manual, rev. A 4.04. Dublin: Carl Zeiss Meditec, 2004.
16. Reus NJ, Lemij HG. Diagnostic accuracy of the GDx VCC for glaucoma. Ophthalmology 2004;111:1860-1865
17. Akaike H. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans Autom Contr 1974;19:716-723
18. Burnham KP, Anderson DR. Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretical approach. 2nd edn. New York: Springer, 2002.
19. Gabriele ML, Wollstein G, Bilonick RA, et al. Comparison of parameters from Heidelberg Retina Tomographs 2 and 3. Ophthalmology 2008;115:673-677
20. Le A, Mukesh BN, McCarty CA, et al. Risk factors associated with the incidence of open-angle glaucoma: the visual impairment project. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003;44:3783-3789
21. Coleman AL, Miglior S. Risk factors for glaucoma onset and progression. Surv Ophthalmol 2008;53(1 Suppl):S3-10.
22. He M, Foster PJ, Ge J, et al. Prevalence and clinical characteristics of glaucoma in adult Chinese: a population-based study in Liwan District, Guangzhou. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006;47:2782-2788 (Pubitemid 351639747)
23. Rudnicka AR, Mt-Isa S, Owen CG, et al. Variations in primary open-angle glaucoma prevalence by age, gender, and race: a Bayesian meta-analysis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006;47:4254-4261
24. Suzuki Y, Iwase A, Araie M, et al. Risk factors for open-angle glaucoma in a Japanese population: the Tajimi Study. Ophthalmology 2006;113:1613-1617 (Pubitemid 44292321)
25. Leske MC, Wu SY, Hennis A, et al. Risk factors for incident open-angle glaucoma: the Barbados Eye Studies. Ophthalmology 2008;115:85-93. (Pubitemid 350309410)