DNA Barcodes indicate members of the Anopheles fluviatilis (Diptera: Culicidae) species complex to be conspecific in India

Molecular Ecology Resources

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 354-361

  Pradeep Kumar, N ^a   Krishnamoorthy, N ^c   Sahu, S S ^b   Rajavel, A R ^c   Sabesan, S ^c   Jambulingam, P ^c  

^a Vector Control Research Centre Field Station (ICMR)   (India)

^b Vector Control Research Centre Field Station (ICMR)   (India)

^c VECTOR CONTROL RESEARCH CENTRE   (India)

Author keywords

Anopheles fluviatilis; DNA Barcoding; Malaria; Sibling species; Vector

Indexed keywords

CYTOCHROME C OXIDASE; PRIMER DNA;

ANIMAL; ANOPHELES; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; DISEASE CARRIER; DNA BARCODING; DNA SEQUENCE; GENETIC MARKER; GENETICS; INDIA; METHODOLOGY; MOLECULAR GENETICS; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHYLOGENY; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

ANIMALS; ANOPHELES; BASE SEQUENCE; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; DNA BARCODING, TAXONOMIC; DNA PRIMERS; ELECTRON TRANSPORT COMPLEX IV; GENETIC MARKERS; INDIA; INSECT VECTORS; MODELS, GENETIC; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PHYLOGENY; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

ANOPHELES FLUVIATILIS; CULICIDAE; DIPTERA;

EID: 84876324317     PISSN: 1755098X     EISSN: 17550998     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1755-0998.12076     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Burns JM, Janzen DH, Hajibabaei M, Hallwachs W, Hebert PDN (2008) DNA barcodes and cryptic species of skipper butterflies in the genus Perichares in Area de Conservación Guanacaste, Costa Rica. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. U S A, 105, 6350-6355.
2. Chen B, Butlin RK, Pedro PM, Wang XZ, Harbach RE (2006) Molecular variation, systematics and distribution of the Anopheles fluviatilis complex in southern Asia. Medical and Veterinary Entomology, 20, 33-43.
3. Christophers SR (1933). The Fauna of British India. Today and Tomorrow's Printers and Publishers, New Delhi. p 371.
4. Cywinska A, Hunter FF, Hebert PD (2006) Identifying Canadian mosquito species through DNA Barcodes. Medical and Veterinary Entomology, 20, 413-24.
5. Garros C, Harbach RE, Manguin S (2005) Systematics and biogeographical implications of the phylogenetic relationships between members of the Funestus and Minimus groups of Anopheles (Diptera Culicidae). Journal of Medical Entomology, 42, 7-28.
6. Gunasekaran K, Sahu SS, Vijayakumar KN, Jambulingam P (2009) Acceptibility, willing to purchase and use long lasting insecticide treated mosquito nets in Orissa state, India. Acta Tropica, 112, 149-155.
7. Harbach RE (2004) The classification of genus Anopheles (Diptera: Culicidae): a working hypothesis of phylogenetic relationships. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 95, 537-553.
8. Hebert PDN, Cywinska A, Ball SL, deWaard JR (2003) Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences, 270, 313-321.
9. Hebert PDN, Penton EH, Burns JM, Janzen DH, Hallwachs W (2004) Ten species in one: DNA barcoding reveals cryptic species in the Neotropical skipper butterfly Astraptes fulgerator. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences U S A, 101, 14812-14817.
10. Hudson RR, Slatkin M, Maddison WP (1992) Estimation of levels of gene flow from DNA sequence data. Genetics, 132, 583-589.
11. Jambulingam P, Sahu SS, Manonmani A (2005) Reappearance of Anopheles minimus in Singhbhum hills of East-Central India. Acta Tropica, 96, 31-35.
12. Kimura M (1980) A simple method for estimating evolutionary rate of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 16, 111-120.
13. Kumar NP, Rajavel AR, Natarajan R, Jambulingam P (2007) DNA barcodes can distinguish species of Indian mosquitoes (Diptera: Culici-5 dae). Journal of Medical Entomology, 44, 1-7.
14. Kumar NP, Srinivasan R, Jambulingam P (2012) DNA barcoding for identification of sand flies (Diptera: Psychodidae) in India. Molecular Ecology Resources, 12, 414-420.
15. Lane N (2009) On the origin of Barcodes. Nature, 462, 272-274.
16. Librado P, Rozas J (2009) DnaSP 5.0. A software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics, 25, 1451-1452.
17. Manonmani A, Townson H, Adeniran T, Jambulingam P, Sahu S, Vijayakumar T (2001) rDNA-ITS2 polymerase chain reaction assay for the sibling species of Anopheles fluviatilis. Acta Tropica, 78, 3-9.
18. Rajagopalan PK, Pani SP, Das PK, Jambulingam P (1989) Malaria in Koraput District of Orissa. Indian Journal of Peadiatrics, 56, 355-364.
19. Rivera J, Curry DC (2009) Identification of neartic blackflies using DNA Barcodes (Diptera: Simuliidae). Molecular Ecology Resources, 9, 224-236.
20. Singh OP, Chandra D, Nanda N et al. (2004) Differentiation of members of the Anopheles fluviatilis species complex by an allele-specific polymerase chain reaction based on 28S ribosomal DNA sequences. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 70, 27-32.
21. Singh OP, Nanda N, Vasu Dev B et al. (2010) Molecular evidence of misidentification of Anopheles minimus as Anopheles fluviatilis in Assam (India). Acta Tropica, 113, 241-244.
22. Smith MA, Wood DM, Janzen DH, Hallwachs W, Hebert PD (2007) DNA barcodes affirm that 16 species of apparently generalist tropical parasitoid flies (Diptera, Tachinidae) are not all generalists. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences U S A, 104, 4967-72.
23. Subbarao SK, Nanda N, Vasantha K et al. (1994) Cytogenetic evidence for three sibling species in Anopheles fluviatilis (Diptera: Culicidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America., 87, 116-121.
24. Tajima F (1989) Statistical methods to test for nucleotide mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics, 123, 585-595.
25. Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S (2007) MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 24, 1596-1599.