The effect of limb crossing and limb congruency on multisensory integration in peripersonal space for the upper and lower extremities

Consciousness and Cognition

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 545-555

  Van Elk, Michiel ^a,b   Forget, Joachim ^a   Blanke, Olaf ^a,c  

^a EPFL   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^c GENEVA UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Body representation; Crossmodal congruency effect; Multisensory integration; Peripersonal space; Upper and lower limbs

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; LIMB; MALE; MULTISENSORY INTEGRATION; PERIPERSONAL SPACE; POSITION; PROPRIOCEPTION; SENSORY SYSTEM PARAMETERS; TOUCH; VISION;

EID: 84876318273     PISSN: 10538100     EISSN: 10902376     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2013.02.006     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Aspell J.E., Lenggenhager B., Blanke O. Keeping in touch with one's self: Multisensory mechanisms of self-consciousness. PLoS ONE 2009, 4(8):e6488.
2. Axelrod S., Thompson L.W., Cohen L.D. Effects of senescence on the temporal resolution of somesthetic stimuli presented to one hand or both. Journals of Gerontology 1968, 23:191-195.
3. Azanon E., Camacho K., Soto-Faraco S. Tactile remapping beyond space. European Journal of Neuroscience 2010, 31(10):1858-1867.
4. Azanon E., Soto-Faraco S. Changing reference frames during the encoding of tactile events. Current Biology 2008, 18(14):1044-1049.
5. Berlucchi G., Aglioti S. The body in the brain: Neural bases of corporeal awareness. Trends in Neurosciences 1997, 20(12):560-564.
6. Berlucchi G., Aglioti S.M. The body in the brain revisited. Experimental Brain Research 2010, 200(1):25-35.
7. Botvinick M., Cohen J. Rubber hands 'feel' touch that eyes see. Nature 1998, 391(6669):756.
8. Calvo-Merino B., Grezes J., Glaser D.E., Passingham R.E., Haggard P. Seeing or doing? Influence of visual and motor familiarity in action observation. Current Biology 2006, 16(19):1905-1910.
9. Costantini M., Haggard P. The rubber hand illusion: Sensitivity and reference frame for body ownership. Consciousness and Cognition 2007, 16(2):229-240.
10. de Vignemont F. Body schema and body image - Pros and cons. Neuropsychologia 2010, 48(3):669-680.
11. Dijkerman H.C., de Haan E.H. Somatosensory processes subserving perception and action. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2007, 30(2):189-201. [discussion 201-139].
12. Duysens J., Beerepoot V.P., Veltink P.H., Weerdesteyn V., Smits-Engelsman B.C. Proprioceptive perturbations of stability during gait. Neurophysiologie Clinique 2008, 38(6):399-410.
13. Ehrsson H.H., Holmes N.P., Passingham R.E. Touching a rubber hand: Feeling of body ownership is associated with activity in multisensory brain areas. Journal of Neuroscience 2005, 25(45):10564-10573.
14. Ehrsson H.H., Spence C., Passingham R.E. That's my hand! Activity in premotor cortex reflects feeling of ownership of a limb. Science 2004, 305(5685):875-877.
15. Felician O., Ceccaldi M., Didic M., Thinus-Blanc C., Poncet M. Pointing to body parts: A double dissociation study. Neuropsychologia 2003, 41(10):1307-1316.
16. Gazzola V., van der Worp H., Mulder T., Wicker B., Rizzolatti G., Keysers C. Aplasics born without hands mirror the goal of hand actions with their feet. Current Biology 2007, 17(14):1235-1240.
17. Gentilucci M., Daprati E., Gangitano M. Right-handers and left-handers have different representations of their own hand. Brain Research. Cognitive Brain Research 1998, 6(3):185-192.
18. Goldenberg G. Imitating gestures and manipulating a mannikin - The representation of the human body in ideomotor apraxia. Neuropsychologia 1995, 33(1):63-72.
19. Graziano M.S., Cooke D.F., Taylor C.S. Coding the location of the arm by sight. Science 2000, 290(5497):1782-1786.
20. Holmes N.P., Calvert G.A., Spence C. Tool use changes multisensory interactions in seconds: Evidence from the crossmodal congruency task. Experimental Brain Research 2007, 183(4):465-476.
21. Holmes N.P., Sanabria D., Calvert G.A., Spence C. Multisensory interactions follow the hands across the midline: Evidence from a non-spatial visual-tactile congruency task. Brain Research 2006, 1077(1):108-115.
22. Holmes N.P., Sanabria D., Calvert G.A., Spence C. Tool-use: Capturing multisensory spatial attention or extending multisensory peripersonal space?. Cortex 2007, 43(3):469-489.
23. Ionta S., Fourkas A.D., Fiorio M., Aglioti S.M. The influence of hands posture on mental rotation of hands and feet. Experimental Brain Research 2007, 183(1):1-7.
24. Iriki A., Tanaka M., Iwamura Y. Coding of modified body schema during tool use by macaque postcentral neurones. NeuroReport 1996, 7(14):2325-2330.
25. Kitazawa S. Where conscious sensation takes place. Consciousness and Cognition 2002, 11(3):475-477.
26. Lenggenhager B., Tadi T., Metzinger T., Blanke O. Video ergo sum: Manipulating bodily self-consciousness. Science 2007, 317(5841):1096-1099.
27. Lopez C., Lenggenhager B., Blanke O. How vestibular stimulation interacts with illusory hand ownership. Consciousness and Cognition 2010, 19(1):33-47.
28. Macaluso E., George N., Dolan R., Spence C., Driver J. Spatial and temporal factors during processing of audiovisual speech: A PET study. Neuroimage 2004, 21(2):725-732.
29. Maravita A., Iriki A. Tools for the body (schema). Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2004, 8(2):79-86.
30. Maravita A., Spence C., Kennett S., Driver J. Tool-use changes multimodal spatial interactions between vision and touch in normal humans. Cognition 2002, 83(2):B25-34.
31. Parsons L.M. Imaged spatial transformations of one's hands and feet. Cognitive Psychology 1987, 19:178-241.
32. Pavani F., Spence C., Driver J. Visual capture of touch: Out-of-the-body experiences with rubber gloves. Psychological Science 2000, 11(5):353-359.
33. Riggio L., Gawryszewski L., Umiltà C. What is crossed in crossed-hand effects?. Acta Psychologica (Amsterdam 1986, 62:89-100.
34. Roder B., Kusmierek A., Spence C., Schicke T. Developmental vision determines the reference frame for the multisensory control of action. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2007, 104(11):4753-4758.
35. Roder B., Rosler F., Spence C. Early vision impairs tactile perception in the blind. Current Biology 2004, 14(2):121-124.
36. Rossignol S., Dubuc R., Gossard J.P. Dynamic sensorimotor interactions in locomotion. Physiological Reviews 2006, 86(1):89-154.
37. Salomon R., van Elk M., Aspell J.E., Blanke O. I feel who I see: Visual body identity affects visual-tactile integration in peripersonal space. Consciousness and Cognition 2012, 21(3):1355-1364.
38. Schicke T., Bauer F., Roder B. Interactions of different body parts in peripersonal space: How vision of the foot influences tactile perception at the hand. Experimental Brain Research 2009, 192(4):703-715.
39. Schicke T., Roder B. Spatial remapping of touch: Confusion of perceived stimulus order across hand and foot. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2006, 103(31):11808-11813.
40. Schwoebel J., Coslett H.B., Buxbaum L.J. Compensatory coding of body part location in autotopagnosia: Evidence for extrinsic egocentric coding. Cognitive Neuropsychology 2001, 18(4):363-381.
41. Sengul A., van Elk M., Rognini G., Aspell J.E., Bleuler H., Blanke O. Extending the body to virtual tools using a robotic surgical interface: Evidence from the crossmodal congruency task. PLoS ONE 2012, 7(12):e49473.
42. Shore D.I., Barnes M.E., Spence C. Temporal aspects of the visuotactile congruency effect. Neuroscience Letters 2006, 392(1-2):96-100.
43. Shore D.I., Spry E., Spence C. Confusing the mind by crossing the hands. Brain Research. Cognitive Brain Research 2002, 14(1):153-163.
44. Spence C., Driver J. Covert spatial orienting in audition: Exogenous and endogenous mechanisms facilitate sound localization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1994, 20:555-574.
45. Spence C., Pavani F., Driver J. Crossmodal links between vision and touch in covert endogenous spatial attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2000, 26(4):1298-1319.
46. Spence C., Pavani F., Driver J. Spatial constraints on visual-tactile cross-modal distractor congruency effects. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience 2004, 4(2):148-169.
47. Spence C., Pavani F., Maravita A., Holmes N. Multisensory contributions to the 3-D representation of visuotactile peripersonal space in humans: Evidence from the crossmodal congruency task. Journal of Physiology - Paris 2004, 98(1-3):171-189.
48. Stratton G.M. The spatial harmony of touch and sight. Mind 1899, 8(32):492-505.
49. Tsakiris M., Haggard P. The rubber hand illusion revisited: Visuotactile integration and self-attribution. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2005, 31(1):80-91.
50. Wada M., Yamamoto S., Kitazawa S. Effects of handedness on tactile temporal order judgment. Neuropsychologia 2004, 42(14):1887-1895.
51. Yamamoto S., Kitazawa S. Reversal of subjective temporal order due to arm crossing. Nature Neuroscience 2001, 4(7):759-765.
52. Zopf R., Savage G., Williams M.A. Crossmodal congruency measures of lateral distance effects on the rubber hand illusion. Neuropsychologia 2010, 48(3):713-725.