Representative communication: Web site interactivity and distributional path dependence in the u.s. congress

Political Communication

Volumn 28, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 409-439

  Esterling, Kevin M ^a   Lazer, David M J ^b   Neblo, Michael A ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

legislative communication; legislative Web sites; path dependence; structural equation modeling; U.S. Congress

Indexed keywords

EID: 84859024079     PISSN: 10584609     EISSN: 10917675     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10584609.2011.616875     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Adler, E., Gent, C. E. and Overmeyer, C. B. 1998. The home style homepage: Legislator use of the World Wide Web for constituency contact. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 23: 585-595.
2. Alford, J. R. and Hibbing, J. R. 1981. Increasing incumbency advantage in the House. Journal of Politics, 43: 1042-1061.
3. Alvarez, R. M. 1997. Information and elections, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
4. Bartels, L. M. 1986. Issue voting under uncertainty: An empirical test. American Journal of Political Science, 30: 709-728.
5. Bimber, B. 2003. Information and American democracy: Technology in the evolution of political power, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
6. Bohman, J. 2004. "Expanding dialogue: The Internet, public sphere and transnational democracy". In Democracy online: The prospects for political renewal through the Internet, Edited by: Shane, P. M. 47-61. New York, NY: Routledge.
7. Bollen, K. A. 1989. Structural equations with latent variables, New York, NY: Wiley.
8. Burden, C. and Hysom, T. 2007. 2007 Gold Mouse Report: Lessons from the best Web sites on Capitol Hill, Washington, DC: Congressional Management Foundation.
9. Butler, D. M. 2009. A regression discontinuity design analysis of the incumbency advantage and tenure in the U.S. House. Electoral Studies, 28: 123-128.
10. Canes-Wrone, B., Brady, D. W. and Cogan, J. F. 2002. Out of step, out of office: Electoral accountability and House members' voting. American Political Science Review, 96: 127-140.
11. Chadwick, A. 2006. Internet politics: State, citizens, and new communications technologies, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
12. Congdon, P. 2003. Applied Bayesian modelling, Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
13. Congressional Management Foundation (CMF). 2004. 2004 House Staff Employment Study, Washington, DC: U.S. House of Representatives, Chief Administrative Officer.
14. Cooper, C. A. 2004. Internet use in the state legislature: A research note. Social Science Computer Review, 22: 347-354.
15. Cox, G. W. and Magar, E. 1999. How much is majority status in the U.S. Congress worth?. American Political Science Review, 93: 299-309.
16. Cox, G. W. and Morgenstern, S. 1993. The increasing advantage of incumbency in the U.S. states. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 18: 495-514.
17. Dawes, R. A. and Bacot, A. H. 1998. Electoral career patterns and incumbency advantage in the U.S. House of Representatives. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 23: 575-583.
18. Dawes, S. S., Bloniarz, P. A. and Kelly, K. L. 1999. Some assembly required: Building a digital government for the 21st century, Albany, NY: Center for Technology in Government.
19. DiMaggio, P. J. and Powell, W. W. 1983. The iron cage revisited-Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48: 147-160.
20. Druckman, J. N., Hennessy, C. L., Kifer, M. J. and Parkin, M. 2009. Issue engagement on congressional Web Sites, 2002-2006. Social Science Computer Review, 27: 1-21.
21. Druckman, J. N., Kifer, M. K. and Parkin, M. 2007. The technological development of congressional candidate Websites: How and why candidates use Web innovations. Social Science Computer Review, 25: 425-442.
22. Epstein, D. and Zemsky, P. 1995. Money talks: Deterring quality challengers in congressional elections. American Political Science Review, 89: 295-308.
23. Erikson, R. S. 1971. The advantage of incumbency in congressional elections. Polity, 3: 395-405.
24. Fenno, R. F. 1978. Homestyle: House members in their districts, Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
25. Ferber, P., Foltz, F. and Pugliese, R. 2005. Computer-mediated communication in the Arizona legislature: Applying media richness theory to member and staff communication. State and Local Government Review, 37: 142-150.
26. Fountain, J. E. 2001. Building the virtual state: Information technology and institutional change, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
27. Garson, G. D. 2004. "The promise of digital government". In Digital government: Principles and best practices, Edited by: Pavlichev, A. and Garson, G. D. 2-15. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
28. Gelman, A. and King, G. 1990. Estimating incumbency advantage without bias. American Journal of Political Science, 34: 1142-1164.
29. Gelman, A. and Rubin, D. B. 1992. Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences. Statistical Science, 7: 434-455.
30. Goodliffe, J. 2004. War chests as precautionary savings. Political Behavior, 26: 289-315.
31. Grier, K. B. and Munger, M. C. 1993. Comparing interest group PAC contributions to House and Senate incumbents, 1980-1986. Journal of Politics, 55: 615-643.
32. Herrnson, P. S., Stokes-Brown, A. K. and Hindman, M. 2007. Campaign politics and the digital divide: constituency characteristics, strategic considerations, and candidate internet use in state legislative elections. Political Research Quarterly, 60: 31-42.
33. Johnson, D. W. 2004. Congress online: Bridging the gap between citizens and their representatives, New York, NY: Routledge.
34. Kamarck, E. C. 2002. "Political campaigning on the Internet: Business as usual?". In Governance.com: Democracy in the information age, Edited by: Kamarck, E. C. and Nye, J. S. Jr. 81-103. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
35. King, G. 1991. Constituency service and incumbency advantage. British Journal of Political Science, 21: 119-128.
36. Levitt, S. D. and Wolfram, C. D. 1997. Decomposing the sources of incumbency advantage in the U.S. House. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 22: 45-60.
37. Lieberman, R. C. 2002. Ideas, institutions, and political order: Explaining political change. American Political Science Review, 96: 697-712.
38. Lipinski, D. 2004. Congressional communication: Content and consequences, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
39. Mayhew, D. R. 1974. Congress: The electoral connection, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
40. Owen, D., Davis, R. and Strickler, V. J. 1999. Congress and the Internet. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 4(2): 10-29.
41. Page, S. E. 2006. Path dependence. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 1: 87-115.
42. Pentland, A., Fletcher, R. and Hasson, A. 2004. DakNet: Rethinking connectivity in developing nations. Computer, 37(1): 78-83.
43. Pierson, P. 2000. Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. American Political Science Review, 94: 251-267.
44. Pierson, P. 2004. Politics in time: History, institutions, and social analysis, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
45. Pitkin, H. F. 1967. The concept of representation, Berkeley: University of California Press.
46. Roscoe, T. 1999. The construction of the World Wide Web audience. Media, Culture & Society, 21: 673-684.
47. Schaffner, B. F. 2006. Local news coverage and the incumbency advantage in the U.S. House. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 31: 491-511.
48. Shane, P. M. 2004. "The electronic Federalist: The Internet and eclectic institutionalization of democratic legitimacy". In Democracy online: The prospects for political renewal through the Internet, Edited by: Shane, P. M. 65-82. New York, NY: Routledge.
49. Sparrow, B. H. 2006. A research agenda for an institutional media. Political Communication, 23: 145-157.
50. Spiegelhalter, D., Thomas, A., Best, N. and Gilks, W. 1996. BUGS 0.5: Bayesian inference using Gibbs sampling manual (Version 2, Technical report), Cambridge, England: MRC Biostatistics Unit.
51. Stromer-Galley, J. 2000. On-line interaction and why candidates avoid it. Journal of Communication, 50: 111-132.
52. Suchman, M. C. 1995. Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20: 571-610.
53. Tanner, M. A. and Wong, W. H. 1987. The calculation of posterior distributions by data augmentation. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 82: 528-540.
54. Trier, S. and Jackman, S. 2008. Democracy as a latent variable. American Journal of Political Science, 52: 201-217.
55. Xenos, M. A. and Foot, K. A. 2005. Politics as usual, or politics unusual? Position taking and dialogue on campaign Websites in the 2002 U.S. elections. Journal of Communication, 55: 169-185.