Morpho-physiological heterogeneity of cells within two rat prostate carcinoma cell lines AT-2 and MAT-LyLu differing in the degree of malignancy observed by cell cloning and the effects of caffeine, theophylline and papaverine upon a proportion of the clones

Oncology Reports

Volumn 29, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 1789-1796

  Musialik, Ewa ^a   Ryszawy, Damian ^a   Madeja, Zbigniew ^a   Korohoda, Wlodzimierz ^a  

^a JAGIELLONIAN UNIVERSITY   (Poland)

Author keywords

Caffeine; Cell heterogeneity; Clonal analysis; Epithelial to mesenchymal transition; Papaverine; Rat prostate carcinoma; Theophylline

Indexed keywords

CAFFEINE; CONNEXIN 43; PAPAVERINE; THEOPHYLLINE; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR SNAIL;

ANTINEOPLASTIC ACTIVITY; ARTICLE; CANCER CELL CULTURE; CANCER GROWTH; CANCER INVASION; CANCER MORPHOLOGY; CELL HETEROGENEITY; CELL MIGRATION; CELL STRUCTURE; CONTACT INHIBITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EPITHELIAL MESENCHYMAL TRANSITION; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; IN VITRO STUDY; MALE; MOLECULAR CLONING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE CARCINOMA; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; SPINDLE CELL;

ANIMALS; CAFFEINE; CELL LINE, TUMOR; CELL MOVEMENT; CLONE CELLS; CONNEXIN 43; MALE; NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS; PAPAVERINE; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; RATS; THEOPHYLLINE; TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS;

EID: 84876269067     PISSN: 1021335X     EISSN: 17912431     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3892/or.2013.2323     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Wang N, Wilkin A, Böcking A and Tribukait B: Evaluation of tumor heterogeneity of prostate carcinoma by flow and image DNA cytometry and histopathological grading. Anal Cell Physiol 20: 49-62, 2000.
2. Singh RK and Talmadge JE: The evolution of diversity within tumors and metastases. In: Selected Aspects of Cancer Progression: Metastasis, Apoptosis and Immune Response. Kaiser HE and Nasir A (eds). Springer Science-Business Media BV, Dordrecht, pp59-90, 2008.
3. Marusyk A and Polyak K: Tumor heterogeneity: causes and consequences. Biochim Biophys Acta 1805: 105-117, 2010.
4. Dirks P: Cancer stem cells. Invitation to a second round. Nature 466: 40-41, 2010.
5. Carter HB and Coffey DS: Cell surface charge in predicting metastatic potential of aspirated cells from the Dunning rat prostate adenocarcinoma model. J Urol 140: 173-175, 1988.
6. Carter HB, Partin AW and Coffey DS: Cell surface charge in predicting metastatic potential in an animal model of prostate cancer: flow cytometric quantification of cell surface charge. J Urol 142: 1338-1341, 1989. (Pubitemid 19277986)
7. Fraser SP, Ding Y, Liu A, Foster CS and Djamgoz MBA: Tetrodotoxin suppress morphological enhancement of the metastatic MAT-LyLu rat prostate cell line. Cell Tissue Res 295: 505-512, 1999. (Pubitemid 29106242)
8. Bironaite D, Nesland JM, Dalen H, Risberg B and Bryne M: N-Glycans influence the in vitro adhesive and invasive behaviour of three metastatic cell lines. Tumor Biol 200: 165-175, 2000. (Pubitemid 30241371)
9. Djamgoz MBA, Mycielska M, Madeja Z, Fraser SP and Korohoda W: Directional movement of rat prostate cancer cells in direct-current electric field. Involvement of voltage gated Na+ channel activity. J Cell Sci 114: 2697-2705, 2001. (Pubitemid 32734417)
10. Pokorna E, Zicha D, Chaloupkova A, Matousková E and Vesely P: Two dynamic morphotypes of sarcoma cells, asymmetric stellate and triangle with leading lamella, are related to malignancy. Folia Biol 49: 33-39, 2003. (Pubitemid 36240659)
11. Sanford KK, Likely GD and Earle WR: The development of variations in transplantability and morphology within a clone of mouse fibroblasts transformed to sarcoma-producing cells in vitro. J Natl Cancer Inst 15: 215-237, 1954.
12. Abercrombie M and Ambrose EJ: The surface properties of cancer cells: a review. Cancer Res 22: 332-345, 1962.
13. Moscona A, Trowell QA and Willmer EN: Methods. (Chap. 2). In: Cell and Tissues in Culture. Vol. 1. Willmer EN (ed). Academic Press, London, pp1-98, 1965.
14. Burger MM: The significance of surface structure changes for growth control under crowded conditions. In: Growth Control in Cell Cultures. Wolstenhome GEW and Knight J (eds). Churchill Livingstone, London, pp45-62, 1971.
15. Wyckoff JB, Segall JE and Condeelis JS: The collection of the motile population of cells from a living tumor. Cancer Res 60: 5401-5404, 2000.
16. Thiery JP: Epithelial-mesenchymal transitions in development and pathogenesis. Curr Opin Cell Biol 15: 740-746, 2003.
17. Savagner P: The epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) phenomenon. Ann Oncol 21 (Suppl 7): vii89-vii92, 2010.
18. Graham TR, Zhau H, Odera-Marah VA, Osunkoya AO, Kimbrok S, Tighiouart M, Liu T, Simons JW and O'Regan RM: Insulin-like growth factor-I-dependent up-regulation of ZEB1 drives epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in human prostate cancer cells. Cancer Res 68: 2479-2488, 2008. (Pubitemid 351521824)
19. Klarmann GJ, Hurt EM, Matheus LA, Zhang X, Duhagon MA, Mistree T, Thomas SB and Farrar WL: Invasive prostate cancer cells are tumor initiating cells that have a stem cell-like genomic signature. Clin Exp Metastasis 26: 433-446, 2009.
20. Tate AW, Lung T, Radhakrishnan A, Lim SD, Lin X and Edlund M: Changes in gap junctional connexin isoforms during prostate cancer progression. Prostate 66: 19-31, 2006. (Pubitemid 43005946)
21. Kanczuga-Koda L, Sulkowski S, Lenczewski A, Koda M, Wincewicz A, Baltaziak M and Sulkowska M: Increased expression of connexins 26 and 43 in lymph node metastases of breast cancer. J Clin Pathol 59: 429-433, 2006.
22. Baritaki S, Chapman A, Yeung K, Spandidos DA, Palladino M and Bonavida B: Inhibition of epithelial to mesenchymal transition in metastatic prostate cancer cells by the novel proteasome inhibitor, NPI-0052: pivotal roles of Snail repression and RKIP induction. Oncogene 28: 3573-3585, 2009.
23. Czyz J, Szpak K and Madeja Z: The role of connexins in prostate cancer promotion and progression. Nat Rev Urol 9: 274-282, 2012.
24. Lentini A, Mattioli P, Nicolini L, Pietrini A, Abbruzzese A and Beninati S: Anti-invasive effects of theophylline on experimental B16-F10 melanoma lung metastasis. Cancer J 10: 274-278, 1997. (Pubitemid 27489454)
25. Spangler JG: Bone biology and physiology: implications for novel osteoblastic osteosarcoma treatments. Med Hypotheses 70: 281-286, 2008.
26. Holick CN, Smith SG, Giovannucci E and Michaud DS: Coffee, tea, caffeine intake, and risk of adult glioma in three prospective cohort studies. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 19: 39-47, 2010.
27. Wilson KM, Kasperzyk JL, Rider JR, Kenfield S, Van Dam RM, Stampfer MJ, Giovannucci E and Mucci LA: Coffee consumption and prostate risk and progression in the health professionals follow up study. J Natl Cancer Inst 103: 876-884, 2011.
28. Isaacs JT: The R-3327 system of rat prostatic cancers. Urol Oncol 2: 115-116, 1996.
29. Ramaekers FC, Verhagen AP, Isaacs JT, Feitz WF, Moesker O, SchaartG, Schalken JA and Voijs GP: Intermediate filament expression and the progression of prostatic cancer as studied in the Dunning R-3327 rat prostatic carcinoma system. Prostate 14: 323-339, 1989. (Pubitemid 19208207)
30. Erickson CA and Nuccitelli R: Embryonic fibroblast motility and orientation can be influenced by physiological electric fields. J Cell Biol 98: 296-307, 1984. (Pubitemid 14221288)
31. Korohoda W and Madeja Z: Contact of sarcoma cells with aligned fibroblasts accelerated their displacement: computer-assisted analysis of tumour cell locomotion in co-culture. Biochem Cell Biol 75: 263-276, 1997. (Pubitemid 127733152)
32. Waligorska A, Wianecka-Skoczen M, Nowak P and Korohoda W: Some difficulties in research into cell motile activity under isotropic conditions. Folia Biol 55: 9-16, 2007. (Pubitemid 46119322)
33. Daniel-Wojcik A, Misztal K, Bechyne I, Sroka J, Miekus K, Madeja Z and Czyz J: Cell motility affects the intensity of gap junctional coupling in prostate carcinoma and melanoma cell populations. Int J Oncol 33: 309-315, 2009.
34. Miekus K, Czernik M, Sroka J, Czyz J and Madeja Z: Contact stimulation of prostate cancer cell migration: the role of gap junctional coupling and migration stimulated by heterotypic cell-to-cell contacts in determination of the metastatic phenotype of Dunning rat prostate cancer cells. Biol Cell 97: 893-903, 2005. (Pubitemid 41819307)
35. Burke JM, Skumasz CMB, Irwing PE and McKay BS: Phenotypic heterogeneity of retinoid pigment epithelial cells in vitro and in situ. Exp Eye Res 62: 63-73, 1996. (Pubitemid 26135474)
36. Forrester JA: Microelectrophoresis of normal and polyoma virus transformed hamster kidney fibroblasts. In: Cell Electrophoresis. Ambrose EJ (ed). J. & A. Churchill Ltd., London, pp115-124, 1965.
37. Korohoda W and Czyz J: Efficacy of the Frame and Hu mathematical model for the quantitative analysis of agents influencing growth of chick embryo fibroblasts. Folia Histochem Cytobiol 32: 113-118, 1994. (Pubitemid 24220287)
38. Prasad KN and Sheppard JR: Inhibitor of cyclic-nucleotide phosphodiesterase tumor cells induce morphological differentiation of mouse neuroblastoma cell culture. Exp Cell Res 73: 436-440, 1972.
39. Weiss L and Subjeck JR: Electrical heterogeneity of the surfaces of Ehrlich ascites tumor cells. Ann NY Acad Sci 238: 352-361, 1974.