Multiple Document Comprehension: An Approach to Public Understanding of Science

Cognition and Instruction

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 122-129

  Stadtler, Marc ^a   Bromme, Rainer ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MÜNSTER   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84876263931     PISSN: 07370008     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07370008.2013.771106     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Baker, L. 1989. Metacognition, comprehension monitoring, and the adult reader. Educational Psychology Review, 1: 3-38.
2. Bayard, P. 2009. Wie man über Bücher spricht, die man nicht gelesen hat [How to talk about books you haven't read], München, Germany: Goldmann.
3. Braasch, J., Rouet, J.-F., Vibert, N. and Britt, M. 2012. Readers' use of source information in text comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 40: 450-465. doi:10.3758/s13421-011-0160-6
4. Bråten, I. and Strømsø, H. I. 2010. Effects of task instruction and personal epistemology on the understanding of multiple texts about climate change. Discourse Processes, 74: 1-31.
5. Bråten, I., Strømsø, H. I. and Britt, M. A. 2009. Trust matters: Examining the role of source evaluation in students' construction of meaning within and across multiple texts. Reading Research Quarterly, 44: 6-28.
6. Bråten, I., Britt, M. A., Strømsø, H. I. and Rouet, J.-F. 2011. The role of epistemic beliefs in the comprehension of multiple expository texts: Toward an integrated model. Educational Psychologist, 46: 48-70.
7. Britt, M. A. and Aglinskas, C. 2002. Improving student's ability to identify and use source information. Cognition and instruction, 20: 485-522.
8. Britt, M. A., Rouet, J.-F. and Braasch, J. L. G. 2013. "Documents as entities". In Reading-From words to multiple texts, Edited by: Britt, M. A., Goldman, S. R. and Rouet, J.-F. 160-179. New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
9. Britt, M. A., Rouet, J.-F. and Perfetti, C. A. 1996. "Using hypertext to study and reason about historical evidence". In Hypertext and cognition, Edited by: Rouet, J.-F. and Levonen, J. J. 43-72. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
10. Britt, M. A., Rouet, J.-F., Georgi, M. C. and Perfetti, C. A. 1994. "Learning from history texts: From causal analysis to argument models". In Teaching and learning in history, Edited by: Leinhardt, G., Beck, I. L. and Stainton, C. 47-84. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. Bromme, R. and Stahl, E., eds. 2002. Writing hypertext and learning: Conceptual and empirical approaches. Advances in learning and instruction series, London, England: Pergamon.
12. Bromme, R., Kienhues, D. and Porsch, T. 2010. "Who knows what and who can we believe? Epistemological beliefs are beliefs about knowledge (mostly) attained from others". In Personal epistemology in the classroom: Theory, research, and implications for practice, Edited by: Bendixen, L. and Feucht, F. 163-193. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
13. Gil, L., Bråten, I., Vidal-Abarca, E. and Strømsø, H. I. 2010. Summary versus argument tasks when working with multiple documents: Which is better for whom?. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35(3): 157-173. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2009.11.002
14. Goldman, S. R. 2004. "Cognitive aspects of constructing meaning through and across multiple texts". In Uses of intertextuality in classroom and educational research, Edited by: Shuart-Ferris, N. and Bloome, D. M. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
15. Goldman, S. R. in press. "Reading and the web: Broadening the need for complex comprehension". In Reading at a crossroads? Disjunctures and continuities in current conceptions and practices, Edited by: Spiro, R. J., DeSchryver, M., Morsink, P., Hagerman, M. S. and Thompson, P. New York, NY: Routledge.
16. Goldman, S. R., Lawless, K. A. and Manning, F. 2013. "Research and development of multiple source comprehension assessment". In Reading - From words to multiple texts, Edited by: Britt, M. A., Goldman, S. R. and Rouet, J. F. 180-199. New York, NY: To appear in Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
17. Goldman, S. R., Braasch, J. L. G., Wiley, J., Graesser, A. C. and Brodowinska, K. 2012. Comprehending and learning from internet sources: Processing patterns of better and poorer learners. Reading Research Quarterly, 47(4): 356-381. doi:10.1002/RRQ.027
18. Goldman, S. R., Lawless, K. A., Gomez, K. W., Braasch, J. L., MacLeod, S. M. and Manning, F. H. 2010. "Literacy in the digital world. Comprehending and learning from multiple sources". In Bringing reading to research life, Edited by: McKeown, M. G. and Kucan, L. 257-284. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
19. Goldman, S. R., Lawless, K. A., Pellegrino, J. W., Braasch, J. L.G., Manning, F. H. and Gomez, K. 2012. "A technology for assessing multiple source comprehension: An essential skill of the 21st century". In Technology-based assessments for 21st century skills: Theoretical and practical implications from modern research, Edited by: Mayrath, M., Clarke-Midura, J. and Robinson, D. H. 171-207. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
20. Graesser, A. C. 1981. Prose comprehension beyond the word., New York, NY: Springer.
21. Hartmann, D. K. 1995. Eight readers reading: The intertextual links of proficient readers reading multiple passages. Reading Research Quarterly, 30: 520-561.
22. Hartmann, D. K. 2004. "Deconstructing the reader, the text, the author, and the context: Intertextuality and reading from a cognitive perspective". In Uses of intertextuality in classroom and educational research, Edited by: Shuart-Faris, N. and Bloome, D. 353-371. Greenwich, CT:: Information Age.
23. Jucks, R. and Paus, E. this issue. Different words for the same concept: Learning collaboratively from multiple documents. Cognition and Instruction,
24. Kammerer, Y., Bråten, I., Gerjets, P. and Strømsø, H. I. 2012. The role of internet-specific epistemic beliefs in laypersons' source evaluations and decisions during web search on a medical issue. Computers in Human Behavior, doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.10.012
25. Kintsch, W. 1988. The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95: 163-182.
26. Kintsch, W. 1998. Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
27. Leu, D. J., McVerry, G., O'Byrne, I., Zawilinski, L., Castek, J. and Hartman, D. K. 2009. "The new literacies of online reading comprehension and the irony of No Child Left Behind: Students who require our assistance the most actually receive it the least". In, Handbook of research on literacy and diversity, Edited by: Morrow, L. M., Rueda, R. and Lapp, D. 173-194. New York, NY: Guilford.
28. Leu, D. J., Zawilinski, L., Castek, J., Banerjee, M., Housand, B., Liu, Y. and O′Neil, M. 2007. "What is new about the new literacies of online reading comprehension?". In Secondary school literacy: What research reveals for classroom practices, Edited by: Rush, L., Eakle, J. and Berger, A. 37-68. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
29. Macedo-Rouet, M., Braasch, J., Britt, M. A. and Rouet, J.-F. this issue. Teaching fourth and fifth graders to evaluate information sources during text comprehension. Cognition and Instruction,
30. Maier, J. and Richter, T. this issue. Text-belief consistency effects in the comprehension of multiple texts with conflicting information. Cognition and Instruction,
31. Nokes, J. D., Dole, J. A. and Hacker, D. J. 2007. Teaching high school students to use heuristics while reading historical texts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99: 492-504.
32. Norris, S. P. and Phillips, L. M. 2003. How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy. Science Education, 87: 224-240. doi:10.1002/sce.10066
33. Otero, J. C. and Campanario, J. M. 1990. Comprehension evaluation and regulation in learning from science texts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27: 447-460.
34. Otero, J. M. and Kintsch, W. 1992. Failures to detect contradictions in a text: What readers believe versus what they read. Psychological Science, 3: 22-235.
35. Perfetti, C. A., Britt, M. A. and Georgi, M. C. 1995. Text-based learning and reasoning: Studies in history, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
36. Perfetti, C. A., Rouet, J.-F. and Britt, M. A. 1999. "Toward a theory of documents representation". In The construction of mental representations during reading, Edited by: van Oostendorp, H. and Goldman, S. R. 99-122. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
37. Pew Internet and American Life Project. 2006. The internet as a resource for news and information about science Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/~/media//Files/Reports/2006/
38. Rouet, J.-F. 2006. The skills of document use: From text comprehension to web-based learning, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
39. Rouet, J.-F. and Britt, M. A. 2011. "Relevance processes in multiple document comprehension". In Relevance instructions and goal-focusing in text learning, Edited by: McCrudden, M. T., Magliano, J. P. and Schraw, G. 19-52. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
40. Rouet, J.-F., Britt, M. A., Mason, R. A. and Perfetti, C. A. 1996. Using multiple sources of evidence to reason about history. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88: 478-493.
41. Rouet, J.-F., Favart, M., Britt, M. A. and Perfetti, C. A. 1997. Studying and using multiple documents in history: Effects of discipline expertise. Cognition and Instruction, 15: 85-106.
42. Rouet, J.-F., Marron, M. A., Perfetti, C. A. and Favart, M. 1998. "Understanding historical controversies: Students' evaluation and use of documentary evidence". In Learning and reasoning in history, Edited by: Voss, J. F. and Carretero, M. 95-116. London, England:: Woburn Press.
43. Salmerón, L., Gil, L., Bråten, I. and Strømsø, H. 2010. Comprehension effects of signaling relationships between documents in search engines. Computers in Human Behavior, 26: 419-426. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2009.11.013
44. Stadtler, M. and Bromme, R. 2007. Dealing with multiple documents on the WWW: The role of metacognition in the formation of documents models. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2: 191-210. doi:10.1007/s11412-007-9015-3
45. Stadtler, M. and Bromme, R. 2008. Effects of the metacognitive computer-tool met.a.ware on the web search of laypersons. Computers in Human Behavior, 24: 716-737.
46. Stadtler, M., Scharrer, L. and Bromme, R. 2011. "How reading goals and rhetorical signals influence recipients' recognition of intertextual conflicts". In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Edited by: Carlson, L., Hoelscher, C. and Shipley, T. F. 1346-1351. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
47. Stadtler, M., Scharrer, L., Brummernhenrich, B. and Bromme, R. this issue. Dealing with uncertainty: Readers' memory for and use of conflicting information from science texts as function of presentation format and source expertise. Cognition and Instruction,
48. Strømsø, H. I., Bråten, I., Britt, M. A. and Ferguson, L. 2013. Spontaneous sourcing among students reading multiple documents. Cognition and Instruction, 31: 176-203.
49. Wiley, J. and Voss, J. F. 1996. The effects of 'playing historian' on learning in history. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10: 63-72.
50. Wiley, J. and Voss, J. F. 1999. Constructing arguments from multiple sources: Tasks that promote understanding and not just memory for text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91: 301-311.
51. Wiley, J., Goldman, S. R., Graesser, A. C., Sanchez, C. A., Ash, I. K. and Hemmerich, J. A. 2009. Source evaluation, comprehension, and learning in internet science inquiry tasks. American Educational Research Journal, 46: 1060-1106.
52. Wineburg, S. S. 1991. Historical problem solving: A study of the cognitive processes used in the evaluation of documentary and pictorial evidence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83: 73-87.
53. Wineburg, S. S. 1998. Reading Abraham Lincoln: An expert/expert study in the interpretation of historical texts. Cognitive Science, 22: 319-346.