Communicating Corporate Social Responsibility through Nonfinancial Reports

The Handbook of Communication and Corporate Social Responsibility

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 338-357

  Crawford, Elise Perrault ^a   Williams, Cynthia Clark ^a  

^a BENTLEY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

"soft" pressure, by advocates of voluntary reporting; Communicating CSR through nonfinancial reports; Future of nonfinancial reporting; Nonfinancial reporting trends and greater accountability; Nonfinancial reports on environmental and social issues; Public disclosure, reporting information that companies must disclose; Sanctions for noncompliance; Three generic modes of firm stakeholder engagement; Voluntary and mandatory reporting of corporate information; Voluntary reporting efforts, ambiguity in compliance standards

Indexed keywords

EID: 84876245516     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9781118083246.ch17     Document Type: Chapter

References (72)

1. Adams, C. A. (2002). Internal organisational factors influencing corporate social and ethical reporting. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(2). 223-250.
2. Adams, C. A., and Frost, G. R. (2007). Managing social and environmental performance: Do companies have adequate information? Australian Accounting Review, 17(3), 2-11.
3. Adams, M., and Hardwick, P. (1998). An analysis of corporate donations: United Kingdom evidence. Journal of Management Studies, 35, 641-654.
4. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. (1999). SEC issues SAB 99 on materiality. New York, NY: AICPA.
5. Anonymous. (2002). Should the SEC expand nonfinancial disclosure requirements? Harvard Law Review, 115, 24.
6. Ashforth, B. E., and Gibbs, B. W. (1990). The double-edge of organizational legitimation. Organization Science, 1, 177-194.
7. Ball, J. (2009, March 18). Insurers must disclose climate-change exposure. The Wall Street Journal, p. A6.
8. Bansal, P., and Kistruck, G. (2006). Seeing is (not). believing: Managing the impressions of the firm's commitment to the natural environment. Journal of Business Ethics, 67, 165-180.
9. Bansal, P., and Roth, K. (2000). Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 717-736.
10. Berthelot, S., Cormier, D., and Magnan, M. (2003). Environmental disclosure research: Review and synthesis. Journal of Accounting Literature, 22, 1-44.
11. Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP). (2008). Carbon Disclosure Project report 2008 - S&P 500: London, UK: Carbon Disclosure Project.
12. CERES. (2007, October 31). Investors push congress for full corporate disclosure on climate risk. CERES. Retrieved from http://www.ceres.org/Page.aspx?pid=768.
13. Chatterji, A. K., and Levine, D. (2006). Breaking down the wall of codes: Evaluating nonfinancial performance measurement. California Management Review, 48(2), 29-51.
14. Chatterji, A. K., and Listokin, S. (2009). Buying good companies or making them? The impact of pension fund ownership on corporate social responsibility, Manuscript in preparation.
15. Chatterji, A. K., and Toffel, M. W. (2010). How firms respond to being rated. Strategic Management Journal, 31(9), 917-945.
16. Chen, S., and Bouvain, P. (2009). Is corporate responsibility converging? A comparison of corporate responsibility reporting in the USA, UK, Australia, and Germany. Journal of Business Ethics, 87, 299-317.
17. Cheney, G., and Christensen, L. T. (2000). Organizational identity: Linkages between Internal and External Communication. In F. M. Jablin and L. L. Putnam (eds), The new handbook of organizational communication (pp. 231-269). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18. Cho, C. H., Patten, D. M., and Roberts, R. W. (2006). Corporate political strategy: An examination of the relation between political expenditures, environmental performance, and environmental disclosure. Journal of Business Ethics, 67, 139-154.
19. Clark Williams, C. (2008). Toward a taxonomy of corporate reporting strategies. Journal of Business Communication, 45(3), 232-264.
20. Clarkson, P. M., Li, Y., Richardson, G. D., and Vasvari, F. P. (2007). Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32 (4-5).
21. Commission of the European Communities. (2001). Green paper: Promoting a European framework for corporate social responsibility. Brussels, Belgium.
22. Crawford, P. E., and Clark Williams, C. (2009). Corporate responses to direct and indirect environmental engagement strategies. Manuscript in preparation.
23. David, P., Bloom, M., and Hillman, A. J. (2007). Investor activism, managerial responsiveness, and corporate social performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28, 91-100.
24. Davis, A. N., and Humes, S. J. (2004). Environmental disclosures after Sarbanes-Oxley. Practical Lawyer, 50(3), 19-26.
25. Deegan, C., Rankin, M., and Voght, P. (2000). Firm's disclosure reactions to major social incidents: Australian evidence. Accounting Forum, 24, 101-131.
26. Delbard, O. (2008). CSR legislation in France and the European regulatory paradox: An analysis of EU CSR policy and sustainability reporting practice. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 8(4), 397-405.
27. Delmas, M. A., and Toffel, M. W. (2008). Organizational Responses to Environmental Demands: Opening the Black Box. Strategic Management Journal, 29, 1027-1055.
28. Dixon, R., Mousa, G. A., and Woodhead, A. (2005). The role of environmental initiatives in encouraging companies to engage in environmental reporting. European Management Journal, 23(6), 702-716.
29. Dowling, J., and Pfeffer, J. (1975). Organizational legitimacy: Social values and organizational behavior. Pacific Sociological Review, 18(1), 122-136.
30. Eccles, R. G., Herz, R. H., Keegan, E. M., and Phillips, D. M. H. (2001). The value reporting revolution TM: Moving beyond the earnings game. New York, NY: John Wiley.
31. Elkington, J. (1998). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of the 21st century business. Stoney Creek, CT: New Society Publishers.
32. Frooman, J. (1999). Stakeholder influence strategies. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 191-205.
33. Fung, A., Graham, M., and Weil, D. (March, 2003). The political economy of transparency: What makes disclosure policies sustainable? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University working paper OPS-02-03.
34. Gaa, J. C. (2010). Corporate governance and the responsibility of the board of directors for strategic financial reporting, Journal of Business Ethics. 90(supplement 2), 179-197.
35. Gray, R., Kouhy, R., and Lavers, S. (1995). Corporate social and environmental reporting: A review of the literature and a longitudinal study of UK disclosure. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 8(2), 47-77.
36. Guthrie, J., and Parker, L. D. (1989). Corporate social reporting: A rebuttal of legitimacy theory. Accounting and Business Research, 19(76), 343-352.
37. Hebb, T. (2008). No small change: Pension funds and corporate engagement. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
38. Hess, D. (2007). Social reporting and new governance regulation: The prospects of achieving corporate accountability through transparency. Business Ethics Quarterly, 17, 453-476.
39. Hess, D., and Dunfee, T. W. (2007). The Kasky-Nike threat to corporate social reporting: Implementing a standard of optimal truthful disclosure as a solution. Business Ethics Quarterly, 17(1), 5-32.
40. Hess, D., and Warren, D. E. (2008). The meaning and meaningfulness of corporate social initiatives. Business and Society Review, 113(2), 163-197.
41. Hooghiemstra, R. (2000). Corporate communication and impression management: New perspectives why companies engage in corporate social reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 27, 55-68.
42. Hutchison, P. D., and Lee, T. M. (2005). The decision to disclose environmental information: A research review and agenda. Advances in Accounting, 21, 83-111.
43. Investor Responsibility Research Center. (1993, October 1-10). Church activists offer thoughts on withdrawals: Look for "good faith" from the corporate community. News for Investors.
44. Karkkainen, B. C. (2001). Information as environmental regulation: TRI and performance benchmarking, precursor to a new paradigm? Georgetown Law Journal, 89(257), 329-330.
45. King, A. A., and Lenox, M. J. (2000). Industry self-regulation without sanctions: the chemical industry's responsible care program. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 698-716.
46. Kolk, A. (2003). Trends in sustainability reporting by the Fortune Global 250. Business Strategy and the Environment, 12(5), 279-291.
47. KPMG Global Sustainability Services, and University of Amsterdam. (2005). International Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting 2005, Amsterdam, The Netherlands: KPMG.
48. KPMG Global Sustainability Services, and University of Amsterdam. (2008). International survey of corporate responsibility reporting 2008, Amsterdam, The Netherlands: KPMG.
49. Livesey, S. M., and Kearins, K. (2002). Transparent and caring corporations? A study of sustainability reports by The Body Shop and Royal Dutch/Shell. Organization & Environment, 15(3), 27.
50. Logsdon, J. M., and van Buren, H. J. (2009). Beyond the proxy vote: Dialogues between shareholder activists and corporations. Journal of Business Ethics, 87, 353-365.
51. Lyon, T. P., and Maxwell, J. W. (2006). Greenwash: Corporate environmental disclosure under threat of audit. Ann Arbor, MI: Stephen M. Ross School of Business, University of Michigan working paper.
52. Matten, D., and Moon, J. (2008). 'Implicit' and 'explicit' CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. The Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 22.
53. Mattingly, J. E., and Berman, S. L. (2006). Measurement of corporate social action: Discovering taxonomy in the Kinder Lydenburg Domini ratings data. Business & Society, 45(1), 20-46.
54. Meyer, J. W., and Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. The American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340-363.
55. Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., and Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853-886.
56. Murray, A., Sinclair, D., Power, D., and Gray, R. (2006). Do financial markets care about social and environmental disclosure? Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 19(2), 228-255.
57. Neu, D., Warsame, H., and Pedwell, K. (1998). Managing public impressions: Environmental disclosures in annual reports. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 23, 265-282.
58. O'Rourke, A. (2003). A new politics of engagement: Shareholder activism for corporate social responsibility. Business Strategy and the Environment, 12(4), 227-239.
59. Owen, D. (2008). Chronicles of Wasted Time? A personal reflection on the current state of, and future prospects for, social and environmental accounting research. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 21(2), 240-267.
60. Patel, S., Balic, A., Bwakira, L., et al. (2003). Transparency and disclosure study: Europe. New York, NY: Standard & Poor's.
61. Patten, D. M. (1992). Intra-industry environmental disclosures in response to the Alaskan oil spill: A note on legitimacy theory. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 17(5), 471-475.
62. Patten, D. M. (2002). The relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: A research note. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 27, 763-773.
63. Rehbein, K., Waddock, S., and Graves, S. B. (2004). Understanding shareholder activism: Which corporations are targeted? Business and Society, 43(3), 239-268.
64. Reid, E. M., and Toffel, M. W. (2009). Responding to public and private politics: Corporate disclosure of climate change strategies. Strategic Management Journal, 30(11), 1157-1178.
65. RiskMetrics. (2008a, January). Corporate governance and climate change: The banking sector. (CERES Report), New York, NY: RiskMetrics.
66. RiskMetrics. (2008b). Social policy shareholder resolutions in 2008. New York, NY: RiskMetrics.
67. Ryan, L. V., and Sands, R. A. (2004, August). Checklisting and institutional investors: Shortcut or shortchanged? Annual meeting. Symposium conducted at the meeting of the Academy of Management, New Orleans, LA.
68. Securities and Exchange Commission Regulation Fair Disclosure, 17 C.F.R. sections 240, 243, 249 (2000).
69. Swift, T. (2001). Trust, reputation and corporate accountability to stakeholders. Business Ethics: A European Review, 10(1), 10.
70. Walden, W. D., and Schwartz, B. N. (1997). Environmental disclosures and public policy pressure. Journal of Accounting & Public Policy, 16, 125-154.
71. Weaver, G. R., Trevino, L. K., and Cochran, P. L. (1999). Integrated and decoupled corporate social performance: Management commitments, external pressures, and corporate ethics. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 539-552.
72. Westphal, J. D., and Zajac, E. J. (1994). Substance and symbolism in CEO's long term incentive plans. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 367-390.