Adaptive memory: The survival-processing memory advantage is not due to negativity or mortality salience

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 41, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 490-502

  Bell, Raoul ^a   Röer, Jan P ^a   Buchner, Axel ^a  

^a HEINRICH HEINE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Emotional memory enhancement; Evolution; Mortality salience; Negativity effect; Survival processing effect

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; EMOTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGINATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSIOLOGY; RECALL; YOUNG ADULT; ARTICLE;

ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; EMOTIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGINATION; MALE; MENTAL RECALL; MIDDLE AGED; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84876180035     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: 15325946     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13421-012-0290-5     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Allan, K., Jones, B. C., DeBruine, L. M., & Smith, D. S. (2012). Evidence of adaptation for mate choice within women's memory. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33, 193-199.
2. Anderson, J. R. (1983). A spreading activation theory of memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 261-295. doi: 10. 1016/S0022-5371(83)90201-3.
3. Aslan, A., & Bäuml, K.-H. T. (2012). Adaptive memory: Young children show enhanced retention of fitness-related information. Cognition, 122, 118-122.
4. Bell, R., & Buchner, A. (2012). How adaptive is memory for cheaters? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 403-408. doi: 10. 1177/0963721412458525.
5. Bell, R., Buchner, A., & Musch, J. (2010). Enhanced old-new recognition and source memory for faces of cooperators and defectors in a social-dilemma game. Cognition, 117, 261-275. doi: 10. 1016/j. cognition. 2010. 08. 020.
6. Buchner, A., Bell, R., Mehl, B., & Musch, J. (2009). No enhanced recognition memory, but better source memory for faces of cheaters. Evolution and Human Behavior, 30, 212-224. doi: 10. 1016/j. evolhumbehav. 2009. 01. 004.
7. Burns, D. J., Burns, S. A., & Hwang, A. J. (2011). Adaptive memory: Determining the proximate mechanisms responsible for the memorial advantages of survival processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 206-218. doi: 10. 1037/a0021325.
8. Butler, A. C., Kang, S. H. K., & Roediger, H. L., III. (2009). Congruity effects between materials and processing tasks in the survival processing paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 1477-1486. doi: 10. 1037/a0017024.
9. Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671-684. doi: 10. 1016/S0022-5371(72)80001-X.
10. Erdfelder, E., & Kroneisen, M. (in press). Proximate cognitive mechanisms underlying the survival processing effect. In B. L. Schwartz, M. L. Howe, M. P. Toglia, & H. Otgaar (Eds.), What is adaptive about adaptive memory? Oxford, U. K.: Oxford University Press.
11. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175-191. doi: 10. 3758/BF03193146.
12. Hart, J., & Burns, D. J. (2012). Nothing concentrates the mind: Thoughts of death improve recall. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19, 264-269. doi: 10. 3758/s13423-011-0211-9.
13. Howe, M. L., & Derbish, M. H. (2010). On the susceptibility of adaptive memory to false memory illusions. Cognition, 115, 252-267.
14. Howe, M. L., & Otgaar, H. (in press). Proximate mechanisms and the development of adaptive memory. Current Directions in Psychological Science.
15. Kang, S. H. K., McDermott, K. B., & Cohen, S. M. (2008). The mnemonic advantage of processing fitness-relevant information. Memory & Cognition, 36, 1151-1156. doi: 10. 3758/MC. 36. 6. 1151.
16. Kensinger, E. A. (2007). Negative emotion enhances memory accuracy: Behavioral and neuroimaging evidence. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 213-218. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1467-8721. 2007. 00506. x.
17. Kensinger, E. A., & Corkin, S. (2003). Memory enhancement for emotional words: Are emotional words more vividly remembered than neutral words? Memory & Cognition, 31, 1169-1180. doi: 10. 3758/BF03195800.
18. Kensinger, E. A., Garoff-Eaton, R. J., & Schacter, D. L. (2007). Effects of emotion on memory specificity: Memory trade-offs elicited by negative visually arousing stimuli. Journal of Memory and Language, 56, 575-591. doi: 10. 1016/j. jml. 2006. 05. 004.
19. Kensinger, E. A., & Schacter, D. L. (2006). Amygdala activity is associated with the successful encoding of item, but not source, information for positive and negative stimuli. Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 2564-2570.
20. Klein, S. B., Cosmides, L., Tooby, J., & Chance, S. (2002). Decisions and the evolution of memory: Multiple systems, multiple functions. Psychological Review, 109, 306-329.
21. Klein, S. B., Robertson, T. E., & Delton, A. W. (2011). The future-orientation of memory: Planning as a key component mediating the high levels of recall found with survival processing. Memory, 19, 121-139.
22. Kostic, B., McFarlan, C. C., & Cleary, A. M. (2012). Extensions of the survival advantage in memory: Examining the role of ancestral context and implied social isolation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 1091-1098. doi: 10. 1037/a0026974.
23. Kroneisen, M., & Erdfelder, E. (2011). On the plasticity of the survival processing effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 1553-1562.
24. Kroneisen, M., Erdfelder, E., & Buchner, A. (in press). The proximate memory mechanism underlying the survival-processing effect: Richness of encoding or interactive imagery? Memory. doi: 10. 1080/09658211. 2012. 741603.
25. Levine, L. J., & Edelstein, R. S. (2009). Emotion and memory narrowing: A review and goal-relevance approach. Cognition and Emotion, 23, 833-875.
26. Mather, M. (2007). Emotional arousal and memory binding: An object-based framework. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2, 33-52. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1745-6916. 2007. 00028. x.
27. Nairne, J. S. (2010). Adaptive memory: Evolutionary constraints on remembering. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 53, pp. 1-32). San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press.
28. Nairne, J. S., & Pandeirada, J. N. S. (2008a). Adaptive memory: Is survival processing special? Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 377-385. doi: 10. 1016/j. jml. 2008. 06. 001.
29. Nairne, J. S., & Pandeirada, J. N. S. (2008b). Adaptive memory: Remembering with a stone-age brain. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17, 239-243. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1467-8721. 2008. 00582. x.
30. Nairne, J. S., & Pandeirada, J. N. S. (2010). Adaptive memory: Nature's criterion and the functionalist agenda. The American Journal of Psychology, 123, 381-390. doi: 10. 5406/amerjpsyc. 123. 4. 0381.
31. Nairne, J. S., & Pandeirada, J. N. S. (2011). Congruity effects in the survival processing paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 539-549. doi: 10. 1037/a0021960.
32. Nairne, J. S., Pandeirada, J. N. S., Gregory, K. J., & van Arsdall, J. E. (2009). Adaptive memory: Fitness relevance and the hunter-gatherer mind. Psychological Science, 20, 740-746. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1467-9280. 2009. 02356. x.
33. Nairne, J. S., Pandeirada, J. N. S., & Thompson, S. R. (2008). Adaptive memory: The comparative value of survival processing. Psychological Science, 19, 176-180. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1467-9280. 2008. 02064. x.
34. Nairne, J. S., Thompson, S. R., & Pandeirada, J. N. S. (2007). Adaptive memory: Survival processing enhances retention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 263-273. doi: 10. 1037/0278-7393. 33. 2. 263.
35. New, J., Krasnow, M. M., Truxaw, D., & Gaulin, S. J. C. (2007). Spatial adaptations for plant foraging: Women excel and calories count. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 274, 2679-2684.
36. Otgaar, H., & Smeets, T. (2010). Adaptive memory: Survival processing increases both true and false memory in adults and children. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 1010-1016. doi: 10. 1037/a0019402.
37. Otgaar, H., Smeets, T., & van Bergen, S. (2010). Picturing survival memories: Enhanced memory after fitness-relevant processing occurs for verbal and visual stimuli. Memory & Cognition, 38, 23-28. doi: 10. 3758/MC. 38. 1. 23.
38. Pyszczynski, T., Greenberg, J., & Solomon, S. (1999). A dual-process model of defense against conscious and unconscious death-related thoughts: an extension of terror management theory. Psychological Review, 106, 835-845.
39. Röer, J. P., Bell, R., & Buchner, A. (in press). Is the survival-processing memory advantage due to richness of encoding? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. doi: 10. 1037/a0031214.
40. Röer, J. P., Bell, R., Dentale, S., & Buchner, A. (2011). The role of habituation and attentional orienting in the disruption of short-term memory performance. Memory & Cognition, 39, 839-850. doi: 10. 3758/s13421-010-0070-z.
41. Romani, C., McAlpine, S., & Martin, R. C. (2008). Concreteness effects in different tasks: Implications for models of short-term memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 292-323.
42. Smeets, T., Otgaar, H., Raymaekers, L., Peters, M. J. V., & Merckelbach, H. (2012). Survival processing in times of stress. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19, 113-118. doi: 10. 3758/s13423-011-0180-z.
43. Soderstrom, N. C., & McCabe, D. P. (2011). Are survival processing memory advantages based on ancestral priorities? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 564-569. doi: 10. 3758/s13423-011-0060-6.
44. Weinstein, Y., Bugg, J. M., & Roediger, H. L., III. (2008). Can the survival recall advantage be explained by basic memory process? Memory & Cognition, 36, 913-919. doi: 10. 3758/MC. 36. 5. 913.
45. Wilson, S., Darling, S., & Sykes, J. (2011). Adaptive memory: Fitness relevant stimuli show a memory advantage in a game of pelmanism. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 781-786.