Enhanced old-new recognition and source memory for faces of cooperators and defectors in a social-dilemma game

Cognition

Volumn 117, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 261-275

  Bell, Raoul ^a   Buchner, Axel ^a   Musch, Jochen ^a  

^a HEINRICH HEINE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cheater detection; Cheater recognition; Context memory; Cooperation; Reciprocal altruism; Source monitoring

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COOPERATION; FACE; FEMALE; GAME; HUMAN; INFORMATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEMORY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECOGNITION; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL INTERACTION; SOCIAL PROBLEM; TRUST;

ADULT; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); FACE; FEMALE; GAMES, EXPERIMENTAL; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MALE; MEMORY; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); REWARD; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 78049366424     PISSN: 00100277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.08.020     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Aktipis C.A. Recognition memory and the evolution of cooperation: How simple strategies succeed in an agent-based world. Adaptive Behavior 2006, 14:239-247.
2. Axelrod R., Hamilton W.D. The evolution of cooperation. Science 1981, 211:1390-1396.
3. Barclay P. Enhanced recognition of defectors depends on their rarity. Cognition 2008, 107:817-828.
4. Barclay P., Lalumière M.L. Do people differentially remember cheaters?. Human Nature 2006, 17:98-113.
5. Batchelder W.H., Riefer D.M. Multinomial processing models of source monitoring. Psychological Review 1990, 97:548-564.
6. Bayen U.J., Murnane K., Erdfelder E. Source discrimination, item detection, and multinomial models of source monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1996, 22:197-215.
7. Bayen U.J., Nakamura G.V., Dupuis S.E., Yang C.L. The use of schematic knowledge about sources in source monitoring. Memory & Cognition 2000, 28:480-500.
8. Bell, R., & Buchner, A. (in press-a). Justice sensitivity and source memory for cheaters. Journal of Research in Personality.
9. Bell, R., & Buchner, A. (in press-b). Source memory for faces is determined by their emotional evaluation. Emotion.
10. Bell R., Buchner A. Valence modulates source memory for faces. Memory & Cognition 2010, 38:29-41.
11. Bröder A., Meiser T. Measuring source memory. Zeitschrift fur Psychologie/Journal of Psychology 2007, 215:52-60.
12. Buchner A., Bell R., Mehl B., Musch J. No enhanced recognition memory, but better source memory for faces of cheaters. Evolution and Human Behavior 2009, 30:212-224.
13. Chiappe D., Brown A., Dow B., Koontz J., Rodriguez M., McCulloch K. Cheaters are looked at longer and remembered better than cooperators in social exchange situations. Evolutionary Psychology 2004, 2:108-120.
14. Cosmides L. The logic of social exchange: Has natural selection shaped how humans reason? Studies with the Wason selection task. Cognition 1989, 31:187-276.
15. Cosmides L., Tooby J. Cognitive adaptations for social exchange. The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture 1992, 163-228. Oxford University Press, New York, NY, US. J.H. Barkow, L. Cosmides, J. Tooby (Eds.).
16. Cosmides L., Tooby J. Neurocognitive adaptations designed for social exchange. The handbook of evolutionary psychology 2005, 584-627. John Wiley & Sons Inc, Hoboken, NJ, US. D.M. Buss (Ed.).
17. D'Argembeau A., Van der Linden M. Influence of affective meaning on memory for contextual information. Emotion 2004, 4:173-188.
18. DeScioli P., Kurzban R. Mysteries of morality. Cognition 2009, 112:281-299.
19. *Power3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods 2007, 39:175-191.
20. Fehr E., Fischbacher U. Social norms and human cooperation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2004, 8:187-190.
21. Fehr E., Fischbacher U. Third-party punishment and social norms. Evolution and Human Behavior 2004, 25:63-87.
22. Gigerenzer G., Hug K. Domain-specific reasoning: Social contracts, cheating, and perspective change. Cognition 1992, 43:127-171.
23. Glanzer M., Adams J.K., Iverson G.J., Kim K. The regularities of recognition memory. Psychological Review 1993, 100:546-567.
24. Hammerl M. Der Operationalisierungseffekt. Über den Einfluss der Forschungsstrategie auf die Befunde der experimentellen Psychologie. [The operationalization effect. How the research strategy determines findings in experimental psychology.] 2000, Pabst Science Publishers, Lengerich.
25. Hunt R.R., Worthen J.B. Distinctiveness and memory 2006, Oxford University Press, New York.
26. Klein S.B., Cosmides L., Tooby J., Chance S. Decisions and the evolution of memory: Multiple systems, multiple functions. Psychological Review 2002, 109:306-329.
27. Mealey L., Daood C., Krage M. Enhanced memory for faces of cheaters. Ethology and Sociobiology 1996, 17:119-128.
28. Mehl B., Buchner A. No enhanced memory for faces of cheaters. Evolution and Human Behavior 2008, 29:35-41.
29. Moshagen M. MultiTree: A computer program for the analysis of multinomial processing tree models. Behavior Research Methods 2010, 42:42-54.
30. Nairne J.S. The Functionalist Agenda in Memory Research. Experimental cognitive psychology and its applications 2005, 115-126. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, US. A.F. Healy (Ed.).
31. Nairne J.S., Pandeirada J.N.S. Adaptive memory: Remembering with a stone-age brain. Current Directions in Psychological Science 2008, 17:239-243.
32. Oda R. Biased face recognition in the prisoner's dilemma game. Evolution and Human Behavior 1997, 18:309-315.
33. O'Gorman R., Wilson D.S., Miller R.R. An evolved cognitive bias for social norms. Evolution and Human Behavior 2008, 29:71-78.
34. Parmentier F.B.R., Elford G., Escera C., Andres P., San Miguel I. The cognitive locus of distraction by acoustic novelty in the cross-modal oddball task. Cognition 2008, 106:408-432.
35. Schmidt S.R. Can we have a distinctive theory of memory?. Memory & cognition 1991, 19:523-542.
36. Schröger E., Wolff C. Behavioral and electrophysiological effects of task-irrelevant sound change: A new distraction paradigm. Cognitive Brain Research 1998, 7:71-87.
37. Singer T., Kiebel S.J., Winston J.S., Dolan R.J., Frith C.D. Brain responses to the acquired moral status of faces. Neuron 2004, 41:653-662.
38. Snodgrass J.G., Corwin J. Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: Applications to dementia and amnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1988, 117:34-50.
39. Spaniol J., Bayen U.J. When is schematic knowledge used in source monitoring?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 2002, 28:631-651.
40. Tooby J., Cosmides L., Sell A., Lieberman D., Sznycer D. Internal regulatory variables and the design of human motivation: A computational and evolutionary approach. Handbook of approach and avoidance motivation 2008, 251-271. Psychology Press, New York, NY. A.J. Elliot (Ed.).
41. Trivers R.L. The evolution of reciprocal altruism. The Quarterly Review of Biology 1971, 46:35-57.