Congruity effects in the survival processing paradigm

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

Volumn 37, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 539-549

  Nairne, James S ^a   Pandeirada, Josefa N S ^b  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AVEIRO   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Congruity; Evolution; Memory; Survival

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; EMOTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; LINGUISTICS; LONG TERM MEMORY; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; NOTE; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHYSIOLOGY; RANDOMIZATION; REACTION TIME; RECALL; STUDENT; THINKING; UNIVERSITY;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; EMOTIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL RECALL; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; RANDOM ALLOCATION; REACTION TIME; RETENTION (PSYCHOLOGY); STUDENTS; THINKING; UNIVERSITIES; VERBAL LEARNING; VOCABULARY;

EID: 79952387930     PISSN: 02787393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0021960     Document Type: Note

References (25)

1. Andrews P.W., Gangestad S.W., Matthews D. Adaptationism: How to carry out an exaptationist program. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2002, 25:489-553. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X02000092.
2. Buller D.J. Adapting minds: Evolutionary psychology and the persistent quest for human nature 2005, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
3. Butler A.C., Kang S.H.K., Roediger H.L. Congruity effects between materials and processing tasks in the survival processing paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2009, 35:1477-1486. doi: 10.1037/a0017024.
4. Craik F.I.M. Encoding: A cognitive perspective. Science of memory: Concepts 2007, 129-135. Oxford University Press, New York, NY. H.L. Roediger, Y. Dudai, S.M. Fitzpatrick (Eds.).
5. Craik F.I.M., Tulving E. Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1975, 104:268-294. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.104.3.268.
6. Ermer E., Cosmides L., Tooby J. Functional specialization and the adaptationist program. The evolution of mind: Fundamental questions and controversies 2007, 153-160. Guilford Press, New York, NY. S.W. Gangestad, J.A. Simpson (Eds.).
7. Kang S.H.K., McDermott K.B., Cohen S.M. The mnemonic advantage of processing fitness-relevant information. Memory & Cognition 2008, 36:1151-1156. doi: 10.3758/MC.36.6.1151.
8. Klein S.B., Cosmides L., Tooby J., Chance S. Decisions and the evolution of memory: Multiple systems, multiple functions. Psychological Review 2002, 109:306-329. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.109.2.306.
9. Masson M.E.J., Loftus G.R.L. Using confidence intervals for graphically based data interpretation. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 2003, 57:203-220. doi: 10.1037/h0087426.
10. McGaugh J.L. Make mild moments memorable: Add a little arousal. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2006, 10:345-347. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.06.001.
11. Moscovitch M., Craik F.I.M. Depth of processing, retrieval cues, and uniqueness of encoding as factors in recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 1976, 15:447-458. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(76)90040-2.
12. Nairne J.S. Adaptive memory: Evolutionary constraints on remembering. The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory 2010, 53:1-32. Academic Press, San Diego, CA. B.H. Ross (Ed.).
13. Nairne J.S., Pandeirada J.N.S. Adaptive memory: Remembering with a stone-age brain. Current Directions in Psychological Science 2008, 17:239-243. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00582.x.
14. Nairne J.S., Pandeirada J.N.S. Adaptive memory: Ancestral priorities and the mnemonic value of survival processing. Cognitive Psychology 2010, 61:1-22. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2010.01.005.
15. Nairne J.S., Pandeirada J.N.S., Gregory K.J., Van Arsdall J.E. Adaptive memory: Fitness relevance and the hunter-gatherer mind. Psychological Science 2009, 20:740-746. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02356.x.
16. Nairne J.S., Pandeirada J.N.S., Thompson S.R. Adaptive memory: The comparative value of survival processing. Psychological Science 2008, 19:176-180. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02064.x.
17. Nairne J.S., Thompson S.R., Pandeirada J.N.S. Adaptive memory: Survival processing enhances retention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2007, 33:263-273. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.2.263.
18. Paivio A., Yuille J.C., Madigan S.A. Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1968, 76:1-25. doi: 10.1037/h0025327.
19. Phelps E.A. Emotion and cognition: Insights from studies of the human amygdala. Annual Review of Psychology 2006, 57:27-53. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070234.
20. Rogers T.B., Kuiper N.A., Kirker W.S. Self-reference and the encoding of personal information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1977, 35:677-688. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.35.9.677.
21. Schulman A.I. Memory for words recently classified. Memory & Cognition 1974, 2:47-52.
22. Sherry D.F., Schacter D.L. The evolution of multiple memory systems. Psychological Review 1987, 94:439-454. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.94.4.439.
23. Symons C.S., Johnson B.T. The self-reference effect in memory: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 1997, 121:371-394. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.121.3.371.
24. Van Overschelde J.P., Rawson K.A., Dunlosky J. Category norms: An updated and expanded version of the norms. Journal of Memory and Language 2004, 50:289-335. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2003.10.003.
25. Weinstein Y., Bugg J.M., Roediger H.L. Can the survival recall advantage be explained by the basic memory processes?. Memory & Cognition 2008, 36:913-919. doi: 10.3758/MC.36.5.913.