Effects of intra- and inter-specific competition on fitness of sweetpotato weevil and West Indian sweetpotato weevil

Journal of Applied Entomology

Volumn 137, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 310-316

  Kuriwada, T ^a   Kumano, N ^b   Shiromoto, K ^b   Haraguchi, D ^c  

^a NATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH CENTER FOR KYUSHU OKINAWA REGION   (Japan)

^b Okinawa Prefectural Plant Protection Center Miyakojima   (Japan)

^c OKINAWA PREFECTURAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH CENTER   (Japan)

Author keywords

Density effect; Pest management; Resource partitioning

Indexed keywords

BEETLE; BIOLOGICAL CONTROL; CLIMATIC REGION; FITNESS; INTERSPECIFIC COMPETITION; INTRASPECIFIC COMPETITION; LABORATORY METHOD; NICHE PARTITIONING; PEST CONTROL; PEST SPECIES; POPULATION DENSITY; POTATO;

INDIA;

BRENTIDAE; COLEOPTERA; CURCULIONIDAE; CYLAS FORMICARIUS; EUSCEPES POSTFASCIATUS; IPOMOEA BATATAS;

EID: 84876136966     PISSN: 09312048     EISSN: 14390418     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0418.2012.01745.x     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Agresti A, 1996. An introduction to categorical data analysis. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
2. Alleyne EH, 1982. Studies on the biology and behavior of the West Indian sweet potato weevil, Euscepes postfasciatus (Fairmaire) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Carib. Food Crop Soc. 18, 236-243.
3. Asato S, 1950. The West Indian sweet potato weevil: a new insect pest of sweet potato (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Kunigami-noho 2, 5-11 (in Japanese).
4. Begon M, Harper JL, Townsend CR, 1999. Ecology. individuals, populations and communities. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford.
5. Bolker BM, Brooks ME, Clark CJ, Geange SW, Poulsen JR, Stevens MH, White JS, 2009. Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24, 127-135.
6. Cockerham KL, Deen OT, Christian MB, Newsom LD, 1954. The biology of the sweet potato weevil. La. Tech. Bull. 483, 1-30.
7. Dalgaard P, 2002. Introductory statistics with R. Springer-Verlag, New York.
8. Fujii K, 1967. Studies on interspecies competition between the azuki bean weevils, Callosobruchus chinensis, and the southern cowpea weevil, C. maculatus II. competition under different environmental conditions. Res. Popul. Ecol. 9, 192-200.
9. Heath RR, Coffelt JA, Sonnet PE, Proshold FI, Dueben B, Tumlinson JH, 1986. Identification of sex pheromone produced by female sweetpotato weevil, Cylas formicarius elegantulus (Summers). J. Chem. Ecol. 12, 1489-1503.
10. Inouye BD, 2001. Response surface experimental designs for investigating interspecific competition. Ecology 82, 2629-2706.
11. Jansson RK, Raman KV, 1991. Sweet potato pest management: a global overview. In: Sweet potato pest management: a global perspective. Ed. by Jansson RK, Raman KV, Westview Press, Boulder, 1-12.
12. Kishi S, Nishida T, Tsubaki Y, 2009. Reproductive interference determines persistence and exclusion in species interactions. J. Anim. Ecol. 78, 1043-1049.
13. Klassen W, Curtis CF, 2005. History of the sterile insect technique. In: Sterile insect technique: principles and practice in area-wide integrated pest management. Ed. by Dyck VA, Hendrichs J, Robinson AS, Springer, Dordrecht, 3-36.
14. Kuba H, Kohama T, Haraguchi D, 2003. Eradication projects of exotic sweet potato weevils using SIT in Okinawa. In: Proceedings of the NIAES-FFTC joint international seminar on biological invasions: environmental impacts and the development of a database for the Asian-Pacific region. Ed. byOka M, Matsui M, Shiomi T, Ogawa Y, Tsuchiya K, National institute for agro-environmental sciences and food and fertilizer technology center for the Asian and Pacific Region, Tsukuba, 273-287.
15. Kumano N, Kawamura F, Haraguchi D, 2009. Irradiation does not affect field dispersal ability in the West Indian sweetpotato weevil, Euscepes postfasciatus. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 130, 63-72.
16. Kumano N, Iwata N, Kuriwada T, Shiromoto K, Haraguchi D, Yasunaga-Aoki C, Kohama T, 2010. The neogregarine protozoan Farinocystis sp. reduces longevity and fecundity in the West Indian sweet potato weevil, Euscepes postfasciatus (Fairmaire). J. Invertebr. Pathol. 105, 298-304.
17. Kuriwada T, Kumano N, Shiromoto K, Haraguchi D, 2009. High population density and egg cannibalism reduces the efficiency of mass-rearing in Euscepes postfasciatus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Fla. Entomol. 92, 221-228.
18. Kuriwada T, Kumano N, Shiromoto K, Haraguchi D, 2011a. The effect of inbreeding on mating behaviour of West Indian sweet potato weevil Euscepes postfasciatus. Ethology 117, 822-828.
19. Kuriwada T, Kumano N, Shiromoto K, Haraguchi D, 2011b. Inbreeding avoidance or tolerance? Comparison of mating behavior between mass-reared and wild strains of the sweet potato weevil Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 65, 1483-1489.
20. MacArthur RH, 1972. Geographical ecology: patterns in the distributions of species. Harper and Row, New York.
21. Miyatake T, Moriya S, Kohama T, Shimoji Y, 1997. Dispersal potential of male Cylas formicarius (Coleoptera: Brentidae) over land and water. Environ. Entomol. 26, 272-276.
22. Moriya S, 1995. A preliminary study on the flight ability of the sweetpotato weevil, Cylas formicarius (FABRICIUS) (Coleoptera: Apionidae) using a flight mill. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 30, 244-246.
23. Moriya S, 1997. Is it possible to eradicate the two weevil pests of sweet potato, Cylas formicarius and Euscepes postfasciatus from Japan? Bull. Okinawa Agric. Exp. Stn. 18, 19-27.
24. Mullen MA, 1981. Sweetpotato weevil Cylas formicarius elegantulus (summers), development, fecundity and longevity. Ann. Entomol. Sci. Am. 74, 478-481.
25. Nawa U, 1903. A note of the sweet potato weevil. Konchu Sekai 7, 327-330.
26. Nicholson AJ, 1954. An outline of the dynamics of animal populations. Aust. J. Zool. 2, 9-65.
27. R Development Core Team, 2011. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for statistical computing, Vienna, Austria.
28. Raman KV, Alleyne EH, 1991. Biology and management of the West Indian sweet potato weevil, Euscepes postfasciatus. In: Sweet potato pest management. Ed. by Jansson RK, Raman KV, Westview Press, Boulder, CO, 263-281.
29. Reinhard HJ, 1923. The sweet potato weevil. Tex. Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. 308, 1-90.
30. Sakuratani Y, Nakao K, Aoki N, Sugimoto T, 2001. Effect of population density of Cylas formicarius (Fabricius) (Coleoptera: Brentidae) on the progeny populations. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 36, 19-23.
31. Shimoji Y, 2011. Effect of temperature on the development of the West Indian sweetpotato weevil Euscepes postfasciatus on artificial diets. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 46, 51-54.
32. Shimoji Y, Yamagishi M, 2004. Reducing rearing cost and increasing survival rate of West Indian sweetpotato weevil, Euscepes postfasciatus (Fairmaire) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) on artificial larval diet. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 39, 41-47.
33. Uritani I, Saito T, Honda H, Kim WK, 1975. Induction of furano-terpenoids in sweet potato roots by the larval components of the sweet potato weevils. Agric. Biol. Chem. 39, 1857-1862.
34. Yasuda K, 1993. Seasonal prevalence of the sweetpotato weevil Cylas formicarius and the West Indian sweetpotato weevil Euscepes postfasciatus in Okinawa, Japan. Proc. Assoc. Plant Prot. Kyushu 39, 88-90.
35. Yasuda K, Kohama T, 1990. Distribution of the sweet potato weevil, Cylas formicarius (Fabricius) and the West Indian sweet potato weevil, Euscepes postfasciatus (Fairmire) in Okinawa prefecture. Proc. Assoc. Plant Prot. Kyushu 36, 123-125.