Inbreeding avoidance or tolerance? Comparison of mating behavior between mass-reared and wild strains of the sweet potato weevil

Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

Volumn 65, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 1483-1489

  Kuriwada, Takashi ^a,b   Kumano, Norikuni ^a,b   Shiromoto, Keiko ^a,b   Haraguchi, Dai ^a  

^a Okinawa Prefectural Plant Protection Center Miyakojima   (Japan)

^b Okinawa Prefectural Plant Protection Center   (Japan)

Author keywords

Coleoptera; Domestication; Laboratory adaptation; Relatedness; Sexual selection

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE RADIATION; BEETLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COPULATION; FREQUENCY ANALYSIS; INBREEDING AVOIDANCE; PEST SPECIES; POPULATION STRUCTURE; POTATO; RELATEDNESS; REPRODUCTIVE COST; REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS; SEXUAL SELECTION; THEORETICAL STUDY; TOLERANCE; WILD POPULATION;

COLEOPTERA; CURCULIONIDAE; CYLAS FORMICARIUS; IPOMOEA BATATAS;

EID: 79958839565     PISSN: 03405443     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00265-011-1158-6     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Ala-Honkola O, Uddström A, Diaz Pauli A, Lindström K (2009) Strong inbreeding depression in male mating behaviour in a poeciliid fish. J Evol Biol 22: 1396-1406. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1420-9101. 2009. 01765. x.
2. Bolker BM, Brooks ME, Clark CJ, Geange SW, Poulsen JR, Stevens MH, White JS (2009) Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol Evol 24: 127-135. doi: 10. 1016/j. tree. 2008. 10. 008.
3. Cohen LB, Dearborn DC (2004) Great frigatebirds, Fregata minor, choose mates that are genetically similar. Anim Behav 68: 1229-1236. doi: 10. 1016/j. anbehav. 2003. 12. 021.
4. Crawley MJ (2005) Statistics: an introduction using R. Wiley, West Sussex.
5. Crnokrak P, Roff DA (1999) Inbreeding depression in the wild. Heredity 83: 260-270. doi: 10. 1038/sj. hdy. 6885530.
6. Danielsson I (2001) Antagonistic pre-and post-copulatory selection on male body size in a water strider (Gerris lacustris). Proc R Soc Lond B 266: 1041-1047. doi: 10. 1098/rspb. 2000. 1332.
7. De Luca PA, Cocroft RB (2008) The effects of age and relatedness on mating patterns in thornbug treehoppers: inbreeding avoidance or inbreeding tolerance? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 62: 1869-1875. doi: 10. 1007/s00265-008-0616-2.
8. R Development Core Team (2007) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna.
9. Dyck VA, Hendrichs J, Robinson AS (2005) Sterile insect technique, principles and practice in area-wide integrated pest management. Springer, Dordrecht.
10. Eberhardt WG (1996) Female control: sexual selection by cryptic female choice. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
11. Frankham R (2008) Genetic adaptation to captivity in species conservation programs. Mol Ecol 17: 325-333. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1365-294X. 2007. 03399. x.
12. Frankham R, Ballou JD, Briscoe DA (2002) Introduction to conservation genetics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
13. Grafen A (1990) Do animals really recognize kin? Anim Behav 39: 42-54. doi: 10. 1016/S0003-3472(05)80724-9.
14. Heath RR, Coffelt JA, Sonnet PE, Proshold FI, Dueben B, Tumlinson JH (1986) Identification of sex pheromone produced by female sweetpotato weevil, Cylas formicarius elegantulus (Summers). J Chem Ecol 12: 1489-1503. doi: 10. 1007/BF01012367.
15. Jamieson IG, Taylor SS, Tracy LN, Kokko H, Armstrong DP (2009) Why some species of birds do not avoid inbreeding: insights from New Zealand robins and saddlebacks. Behav Ecol 20: 575-584. doi: 10. 1093/beheco/arp034.
16. Keller LF, Waller DM (2002) Inbreeding effects in wild populations. Trends Ecol Evol 17: 230-241. doi: 10. 1016/S0169-5347(02)02489-8.
17. Kokko H, Ots I (2006) When not to avoid inbreeding. Evolution 60: 467-475. doi: 10. 1554/05-613. 1.
18. Kuriwada T, Kumano N, Shiromoto K, Haraguchi D (2009) Copulation reduces the duration of death-feigning behaviour in the sweetpotato weevil, Cylas formicarius. Anim Behav 78: 1145-1151. doi: 10. 1016/j. anbehav. 2009. 07. 031.
19. Kuriwada T, Kumano N, Shiromoto K, Haraguchi D (2010) The effect of mass-rearing on life history traits and inbreeding depression in the sweetpotato weevil Cylas formicarius elegantulus (Coleoptera: Brentidae). J Econ Entomol 103: 1144-1148. doi: 10. 1603/EC09361.
20. Lacy RC, Sherman PW (1983) Kin recognition by phenotype matching. Am Nat 121: 489-512. doi: 10. 1086/284078.
21. Le Galliard JF, Ferrière R (2008) The adaptive evolution of social traits. In: Danchin E, Giraldeau LA, Cézilly F (eds) Behavioural ecology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 547-575.
22. Lehmann L, Perrin N (2003) Inbreeding avoidance through kin recognition: choosy females boost male dispersal. Am Nat 162: 638-652. doi: 10. 1086/378823.
23. Miyatake T, Moriya S, Kohama T, Shimoji Y (1997) Dispersal potential of male Cylas formicarius (Coleoptera: Brentidae) over land and water. Environ Entomol 26: 272-276.
24. Thurin N, Aron S (2009) Sib-mating in the ant Plagiolepis pygmaea: adaptative inbreeding? J Evol Biol 22: 2481-2487. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1420-9101. 2009. 01864. x.
25. Olsson M, Shine R, Madsen T, Gullberg A, Tegelström H (1996) Sperm selection by females. Nature 383: 585. doi: 10. 1038/383585a0.
26. Oosterhout CV, Trigg RE (2003) Inbreeding depression and genetic load of sexually selected traits: how the guppy lost its spots. J Evol Biol 16: 273-281. doi: 10. 1046/j. 1420-9101. 2003. 00511. x.
27. Parker GA (1979) Sexual selection and sexual conflict. In: Blum MS, Blum NA (eds) Sexual selection and reproductive competition in insects. Academic, London, pp 123-166.
28. Parker GA (2006) Sexual conflict over mating and fertilization: an overview. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 361: 235-259. doi: 10. 1098/rstb. 2005. 1785.
29. Pizzari TH, Løvlie H, Cornwallis CK (2004) Sex-specific, counteracting responses to inbreeding in a bird. Proc Bio Sci 271: 2115-2121. doi: 10. 1098/rspb. 2004. 2843.
30. Pusey A, Wolf M (1996) Inbreeding avoidance in animals. Trends Ecol Evol 11: 201-206. doi: 10. 1016/0169-5347(96)10028-8.
31. Roff DA (2002) Life history evolution. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
32. Sakurai G, Kasuya E (2008) The costs of harassment in the adzuki bean beetle. Anim Behav 75: 1367-1373. doi: 10. 1016/j. anbehav. 2007. 09. 010.
33. Schjørring S, Jäger I (2007) Incestuous mate preference by a simultaneous hermaphrodite with strong inbreeding depression. Evolution 61: 423-430. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1558-5646. 2007. 00028. x.
34. Sgrò CM, Partridge L (2000) Evolutionary responses of the life history of wild-caught Drosophila melanogaster to two standard methods of laboratory culture. Am Nat 156: 341-353.
35. Simmons LW (2001) Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
36. Simmons LW, Thomas ML (2008) No postcopulatory response to inbreeding by male crickets. Biol Lett 4: 183-185. doi: 10. 1098/rsbl. 2007. 0578.
37. Simões P, Rose MR, Duarte A, Gonçalves R, Matos M (2007) Evolutionary domestication in Drosophila subobscura. J Evol Biol 20: 758-766. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1420-9101. 2006. 01244. x.
38. Stearns SC (1992) The evolution of life histories. Oxford University Press, New York.
39. Sugimoto T, Sakuratani Y, Fukui H, Kiritani K, Okada T (1996) Estimating the reproductive properties of the sweet potato weevil, Cylas formicarius (Fabricius) (Coleoptera, Brentidae). Appl Entomol Zool 31: 357-367.
40. Thornhill R (1983) Cryptic female choice and its implications in the scorpionfly Harpobittacus nigriceps. Am Nat 122: 765-788. doi: 10. 1086/284170.
41. Thornhill R, Alcock J (1983) The evolution of insect mating systems. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
42. Thünken T, Bakker TCM, Baldauf SA, Kullmann H (2007) Active inbreeding in a cichlid fish and its adaptive significance. Curr Biol 17: 225-229. doi: 10. 1016/j. cub. 2006. 11. 053.
43. Tregenza T, Wedell N (2002) Polyandrous females avoid costs of inbreeding. Nature 415: 71-73. doi: 10. 1038/415071a.