The effect of inbreeding on mating behaviour of West Indian sweet potato weevil Euscepes postfasciatus

Ethology

Volumn 117, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 822-828

  Kuriwada, Takashi ^a   Kumano, Norikuni ^a   Shiromoto, Keiko ^a   Haraguchi, Dai ^a  

^a Okinawa Prefectural Plant Protection Center Miyakojima   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE RADIATION; BEETLE; COPULATION; FITNESS; FUNCTIONAL MORPHOLOGY; INBREEDING DEPRESSION; MATING BEHAVIOR; POTATO; RELATEDNESS; TOLERANCE; WEIGHT;

INDIA;

CYLAS FORMICARIUS; EUSCEPES POSTFASCIATUS; IPOMOEA BATATAS;

EID: 80051615716     PISSN: 01791613     EISSN: 14390310     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2011.01937.x     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Bolker, B. M., Brooks, M. E., Clark, C. J., Geange, S. W., Poulsen, J. R., Stevens, M. H. & White, J. S. 2009: Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24, 127-135.
2. Cohen, L. B. & Dearborn, D. C. 2004: Great frigatebirds, Fregata minor, choose mates that are genetically similar. Anim. Behav. 68, 1229-1236.
3. Crawley, M. J. 2005: Statistics: An Introduction Using R. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, West Sussex.
4. Crnokrak, P. & Roff, D. A. 1999: Inbreeding depression in the wild. Heredity, 83, 260-270.
5. Dawkins, R. 1979: Twelve misunderstandings of kin selection. Z. Tierpsychol. 51, 184-200.
6. De Luca, P. A. & Cocroft, R. B. 2008: The effects of age and relatedness on mating patterns in thornbug treehoppers: inbreeding avoidance or inbreeding tolerance? Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 62, 1869-1875.
7. Eberhardt, W. G. 1996: Female Control: Sexual Selection by Cryptic Female Choice. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton.
8. Futuyma, D. J. 2009: Evolution, 2nd edn. Sinauer, Massachusetts.
9. Hirota, T. 2004: The evolution of sex-biased dispersal by pre-dispersal copulation and fluctuating environment. J. Anim. Ecol. 73, 1115-1120.
10. Jamieson, I. G., Taylor, S. S., Tracy, L. N., Kokko, H. & Armstrong, D. P. 2009: Why some species of birds do not avoid inbreeding: insights from New Zealand robins and saddlebacks. Behav. Ecol. 20, 575-584.
11. Jennions, M. D. & Petrie, M. 2000: Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits Biol. Rev. 75, 21-64.
12. Keller, L. F. & Waller, D. M. 2002: Inbreeding effects in wild populations. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17, 230-241.
13. Kohama, T. & Sugiyama, M. 2000: External characteristics for sexing the West Indian sweet potato weevil, Euscepes postfasciatus (Fairmaire) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Entomol. Sci. 3, 43-46.
14. Kokko, H. & Ots, I. 2006: When not to avoid inbreeding. Evolution, 60, 467-475.
15. Kumano, N., Kawamura, F., Haraguchi, D. & Kohama, T. 2009a: Irradiation does not affect field dispersal ability in the West Indian sweetpotato weevil, Euscepes postfasciatus. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 130, 63-72.
16. Kumano, N., Haraguchi, D. & Kohama, T. 2009b: Female mating status does not affect male mating behavior in West Indian sweetpotato weevil, Euscepes postfasciatus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Entomol. Exp. Appl. 131, 39-45.
17. Kumano, N., Kuriwada, T., Shiromoto, K., Haraguchi, D. & Kohama, T. 2010: Effect of body size and sex ratio on male alternative mating tactics in Euscepes postfasciatus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Entomol. Exp. Appl. 135, 154-161.
18. Kuriwada, T., Hosokawa, T., Kumano, N., Shiromoto, K., Haraguchi, D. & Takema, F. 2010: Biological role of Nardonella endosymbiont in its weevil host. PLoS ONE, 5, e13101.
19. Lande, R. & Schemske, D. W. 1985: The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression in plants. I. Genetic models. Evolution, 39, 24-40.
20. Le Galliard, J. F. & Ferrière, R. 2008: The adaptive evolution of social traits. In: Behavioural Ecology (Danchin, E., Giraldeau, L. A. & Cézilly, F., eds). Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, pp. 547-575.
21. Lee, C. E. 2002: Evolutionary genetics of invasive species. Trends Ecol. Evol., 17, 386-391.
22. Lehmann, L. & Perrin, N. 2003: Inbreeding avoidance through kin recognition: choosy females boost male dispersal. Am. Nat. 162, 638-652.
23. Moriya, S. 1997: Is it possible to eradicate the two weevil pests of sweet potato [Ipomoea batatas], Cylas formicarius and Euscepes postfasciatus from Japan? Bull. Okinawa Agric. Exp. Stn. 18, 19-27.
24. Motro, U. 1991: Avoiding inbreeding and sibling competition: the evolution of sexual dimorphism for dispersal. Am. Nat. 137, 108-115.
25. Olsson, M., Shine, R., Madsen, T., Gullberg, A. & Tegelström, H. 1996: Sperm selection by females. Nature, 383, 585.
26. Parker, G. A. 1979: Sexual selection and sexual conflict. In: Sexual Selection and Reproductive Competition in Insects (Blum, M. S. & Blum, N. A., eds). Academic Press, London, pp. 123-166.
27. Parker, G. A. 2006: Sexual conflict over mating and fertilization: an overview. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B. 361, 235-259.
28. Pizzari, T. H., Lø, H. & Cornwallis, C. K. 2004: Sex-specific, counteracting responses to inbreeding in a bird. Proc. R. Soc. B. 271, 2115-2121.
29. Pusey, A. & Wolf, M. 1996: Inbreeding avoidance in animals. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11, 201-206.
30. R Development Core Team 2009: R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna.
31. Raman, K. V. & Alleyne, E. H. 1991: Biology and management of the West Indian sweet potato weevil, Euscepes postfasciatus. In: Sweet Potato Pest Management: A Global Perspective (Jansson, R. K. & Raman, K. V., eds). Westview Press, Boulder, pp. 263-281.
32. Sato, Y. & Kohama, T. 2007: Post-copulatory mounting behavior of the West Indian sweetpotato weevil, Euscepes postfasciatus (Fairmaire) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Ethology, 113, 183-189.
33. Schjørring, S. & Jäger, I. 2007: Incestuous mate preference by a simultaneous hermaphrodite with strong inbreeding depression. Evolution, 61, 423-430.
34. Shimizu, T. & Moriya, S. 1996: Daily Locomotor Activity in the Indian Sweet Potato Weevil, Euscepes postfasciatus (FAIRMAIRE) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) and Sweet Potato Weevil, Cylas formicarius (FABRICIUS) (Coleoptera: Brentidae) Monitored by an Actograph System. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 31, 626-628.
35. Simmons, L. W. 2001: Sperm Competition and Its Evolutionary Consequences in the Insects. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton.
36. Simmons, L. W. & Thomas, M. L. 2008: No postcopulatory response to inbreeding by male crickets. Biol. Lett. 4, 183-185.
37. Smith, R. H. 1979: On selection for inbreeding in polygynous animals. Heredity, 43, 205-211.
38. Thornhill, R. 1983: Cryptic female choice and its implications in the scorpionfly Harpobittacus nigriceps. Am. Nat. 122, 765-788.
39. Thünken, T., Bakker, T. C. M., Baldauf, S. A. & Kullmann, H. 2007: Active inbreeding in a cichlid fish and its adaptive significance. Curr. Biol. 17, 225-229.
40. Thurin, N. M. & Aron, S. 2009: Sib-mating in the ant Plagiolepis pygmaea: adaptative inbreeding? J. Evol. Biol. 22, 2481-2487.
41. Tregenza, T. & Wedell, N. 2002: Polyandrous females avoid costs of inbreeding. Nature, 415, 71-73.
42. Waser, P.M., Austad, S. N. & Keane, B. 1986: When should animals tolerate inbreeding? Am Nat. 128, 529-537.
43. Welke, K. & Schneider, J. M. 2009: Inbreeding avoidance through cryptic female choice in the cannibalistic orb-web spider Argiope lobata. Behav. Ecol. 20, 1056-1062.