Contrast-enhanced ultrasound for the evaluation of the cryolesion after laparoscopic renal cryoablation: An initial report

Journal of Endourology

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 402-407

  Barwari, Kurdo ^a   Wijkstra, Hessel ^a   Van Delden, Otto M ^a   De La Rosette, Jean J ^a   Laguna, M Pilar ^a  

^a ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTRAST ENHANCED ULTRASOUND; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CRYOABLATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; KIDNEY CARCINOMA; KIDNEY TUMOR; LAPAROSCOPIC RENAL CRYOABLATION; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TUMOR BIOPSY; ULTRASOUND;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CONTRAST MEDIA; CRYOSURGERY; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; KIDNEY; KIDNEY NEOPLASMS; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84876120142     PISSN: 08927790     EISSN: 1557900X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/end.2012.0400     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Barwari K, de la Rosette J, Laguna MP. Focal therapy in renal cell carcinoma: Which modality is best? Eur Urol Supp 2011;e52-e57
2. Ljungberg B, Cowan NC, Hanbury DC, et al. EAU guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: The 2010 update. Eur Urol 2010;58:398-406
3. Campbell SC, Novick AC, Belldegrun A, et al. Guideline for management of the clinical T1 renal mass. J Urol 2009; 182:1271-1279
4. Leveridge MJ, Mattar K, Kachura J, et al. Assessing outcomes in probe ablative therapies for small renal masses. J Endourol 2010;24:759-764
5. Weight CJ, Kaouk JH, Hegarty NJ, et al. Correlation of radiographic imaging and histopathology following cryoablation and radio frequency ablation for renal tumors. J Urol 2008;179:1277-1281
6. Poff JA, Hecht EM, Ramchandani P. Renal imaging in patients with renal impairment. Curr Urol Rep 2011;12:24-33
7. Mettler FA, Jr., BhargavanM, Faulkner K, et al. Radiologic and nuclear medicine studies in the United States and worldwide: Frequency, radiation dose, and comparison with other radiation sources - 1950-2007. Radiology 2009;253:520-531
8. Smith-Bindman R, Lipson J, Marcus R, et al. Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer. Arch Intern Med 2009;169:2078-2086
9. Wilson SR, Burns PN. Microbubble-enhanced US in body imaging: What role? Radiology 2010;257:24-39
10. Kong WT, Zhang WW, Guo HQ, et al. Application of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography after radiofrequency ablation for renal cell carcinoma: Is it sufficient for assessment of therapeutic response? Abdom Imaging 2011;36:342-347
11. Hoeffel C, Pousset M, Timsit MO, et al. Radiofrequency ablation of renal tumours: Diagnostic accuracy of contrastenhanced ultrasound for early detection of residual tumour. Eur Radiol 2010;20:1812-1821
12. Wink MH, Laguna MP, Lagerveld BW, et al. Contrastenhanced ultrasonography in the follow-up of cryoablation of renal tumours: A feasibility study. BJU Int 2007;99:1371-1375
13. Beemster PW, Barwari K, Mamoulakis C, et al. Laparoscopic renal cryoablation using ultrathin 17-gauge cryoprobes: Midterm oncological and functional results. BJU Int 2010;108: 577-582
14. Wink MH, de la Rosette JJ, Laguna P, et al. Ultrasonography of renal masses using contrast pulse sequence imaging: A pilot study. J Endourol 2007;21:466-472
15. Vandenbroucke JP, von ElmE,AltmanDG, et al. Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and elaboration. PLoSMed 2007;4:e297
16. Weisbord SD, Palevsky PM. Strategies for the prevention of contrast-induced acute kidney injury. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 2010;19:539-549
17. Perini P, Sediri I, Midulla M, et al. Single-centre prospective comparison between contrast-enhanced ultrasound and computed tomography angiography after EVAR. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2011;42:797-802
18. Beemster P, Phoa S, Wijkstra H, et al. Follow-up of renal masses after cryosurgery using computed tomography; enhancement patterns and cryolesion size. BJU Int 2008;101:1237-1242
19. Tsivian M, Kim CY, Caso JR, et al. Contrast enhancement on computed tomography after renal cryoablation: An evidence of treatment failure? J Endourol 2012;26:330-335
20. Lassau N, Chami L, Chebil M, et al. Dynamic contrastenhanced ultrasonography (DCE-US) and anti-angiogenic treatments. Discov Med 2011;11:18-24
21. Romanini L, Passamonti M, et al. Economic assessment of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for evaluation of focal liver lesions: A multicentre Italian experience. Eur Radiol 2007;17 Suppl 6:F99-F106
22. Wilson SR, Greenbaum LD, Goldberg BB. Contrastenhanced ultrasound: What is the evidence and what are the obstacles? AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009;193:55-60