Contrast enhancement on computed tomography after renal cryoablation: An evidence of treatment failure?

Journal of Endourology

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 330-335

  Tsivian, Matvey ^a   Kim, Charles Y ^a   Caso, Jorge R ^a   Rosenberg, Michael D ^a   Nelson, Rendon C ^a   Polascik, Thomas J ^a  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CRYOABLATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; KIDNEY TUMOR; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOGRAPHY; RENAL CRYOABLATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TREATMENT FAILURE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; CONTRAST MEDIA; CRYOSURGERY; FEMALE; HUMANS; KIDNEY; KIDNEY NEOPLASMS; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; TREATMENT FAILURE;

EID: 84859540431     PISSN: 08927790     EISSN: 1557900X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/end.2011.0337     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Novick AC, Campbell SC, Belldegrun A, et al. Guideline for management of the clinical stage 1 renal mass. AUA Guidelines. Available at: http://www.auanet.org/content/guidelines-and-quality-care/clinical-guidelines/ main-reports/renalmass09.pdf. Accessed: May 15, 2009.
2. Polascik TJ, Mouraviev V. The rise of ablative technologies for treating the small renal mass. Eur Urol 2007;52:636-638. (Pubitemid 47126158)
3. Weight CJ, Kaouk JH, Hegarty NJ, et al. Correlation of radiographic imaging and histopathology following cryoablation and radio frequency ablation for renal tumors. J Urol 2008;179:1277-1283.
4. Matin SF. Determining failure after renal ablative therapy for renal cell carcinoma: False-negative and false-positive imaging findings. Urology 2010;75:1254-1257.
5. Stein AJ, Mayes JM, Mouraviev V, et al. Persistent contrast enhancement several months after laparoscopic cryoablation of the small renal mass may not indicate recurrent tumor. J Endourol 2008;22:2433-2439.
6. Tsivian M, Chen VH, Kim CY, et al. Complications of laparoscopic and percutaneous renal cryoablation in a single tertiary referral center. Eur Urol 2010;58:142-147.
7. Leveridge ML, Mattar K, Katchura J, Jewett MA. Assessing outcomes in probe ablative therapies for small renal masses. J Endourol 2010;24:759-764.
8. Beemster P, Phoa S, Wijkstra H, et al. Follow-up of renal masses after cryosurgery using computed tomography; enhancement patterns and cryolesion size. BJU Int 2008;101:1237-1242. (Pubitemid 351549626)
9. Tsivian M, Lyne JC, Mayes JM, et al. Tumor size and endophytic growth pattern affect recurrence rates after laparoscopic renal cryoablation. Urology 2010;75:307-310.
10. Schmit GD, Atwell TD, Callstrom MR, et al. Percutaneous cryoablation of renal masses >/=3 cm: Efficacy and safety in treatment of 108 patients. J Endourol 2010;24:1255-1262.
11. Wright AD, Turk TM, Nagar MS, et al. Endophytic lesions: A predictor of failure in laparoscopic renal cryoablation. J Endourol 2007;21:1493-1496.
12. Derweesh IH, Malcolm JB, Diblasio CJ, et al. Single center comparison of laparoscopic cryoablation and CT-guided percutaneous cryoablation for renal tumors. J Endourol 2008;22:2461-2467.
13. Malcolm JB, Berry TT, Williams MB, et al. Single center experience with percutaneous and laparoscopic cryoablation of small renal masses. J Endourol 2009;23:907-911.
14. Matin SF, Ahrar K, Cadeddu JA, et al. Residual and recurrent disease following renal energy ablative therapy: A multi-institutional study. J Urol 2006;176:1973-1977. (Pubitemid 44633171)
15. Israel GM, Bosniak MA. How I do it: Evaluating renal masses. Radiology 2005;236:441-450. (Pubitemid 41023424)
16. Israel GM, Bosniak MA. Pitfalls in renal mass evaluation and how to avoid them. Radiographics 2008;28:1325-1338.
17. Yoost TR, Clarke HS, Savage SJ. Laparoscopic cryoablation of renal masses: Which lesions fail? Urology 2010;75:311-314.