The readability of principles of macroeconomics textbooks

Journal of Economic Education

Volumn 44, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 178-191

  Tinkler, Sarah ^a   Woods, James ^a  

^a PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Coh Metrix; economics textbooks; Mechanical Turk; readability

Indexed keywords

EID: 84876104033     PISSN: 00220485     EISSN: 21524068     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00220485.2013.770345     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Amazon.com. n.d. Amazon Best Sellers in Macroeconomics. http://www.amazon.com/Best-Sellers-Books- Macroeconomics/zgbs/books/2596/ (accessed July 22, 2012).
2. Amazon Mechanical Turk. n.d. https://www.mturk.com/mturk/welcomestate= WGFMYnM5U1p0MDVRRy9HUW gybTJySXVVNXE0PTIwMTIwMjE4MTgxMFVzZXIudHVya1NlY3VyZX50cnVlJQ (accessed September 12, 2012).
3. Arnold, R. A. 2011. Macroeconomics. 10th ed. Mason, OH: Cengage Learning. http://instructors.coursesmart.com/macroeconomics/arnold/dp/9780538452878.
4. Baayen, R. H., R. Piepenbrock, and L. Gulikers. 1995. The CELEX Lexical Database. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, Linguistic Data Consortium. CD-ROM.
5. Baumol,W. J., and A. S. Blinder. 2012. Macroeconomics: Principles and policy. 12th ed. Mason, OH: Cengage Learning. http://instructors.coursesmart. com/macroeconomics-principles-and-policy/baumol-blinder/dp/9780538453653.
6. Becker, W. E., and M. Watts. 1998. Teaching economics to undergraduates: Alternatives to chalk and talk. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
7. 2008. A little more than chalk and talk: Results from a third national survey of teachingmethods in undergraduate economics courses. Journal of Economic Education 39: 273-86.
8. Case, K. E., R. C. Fair, and S. C. Oster. 2012. Principles of macroeconomics. 10th ed. Boston: Prentice Hall. http://instructors.coursesmart. com/principles-of-macroeconomics-tenth-edition/karl-e-case-ray-c-fair-sharon-m- oster/dp/9780131391413.
9. Colander, D. 2010. Macroeconomics. 8th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill. http://instructors.coursesmart.com/macroeconomics-8th-edition/colander-david/dp/ 0077333330.
10. College Board. 2011. Total group profile report. New York: The College Board. http://professionals.collegeboard.com/profdownload/cbs2011 total group report.pdf.
11. Coltheart, M. 1981. The MRC psycholinguistic database. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology August 33A: 497-505.
12. Cowen, T., and A. Tabarrok. 2012. Modern principles of macroeconomics. 2nd ed. New York: Worth. http://instructors. coursesmart.com/modern-principles- of-macroeconomics-second/cowen-tyler-tabarrok-alex/dp/9781429239981.
13. Deerwester, S. S., T. Dumais, G.W. Furnas, T. K. Landauer, and R. Harshman. 1990. Indexing by latent semantic analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 41: 391-407.
14. Fellbaum, C., ed. 1998. WordNet: An electronic lexical database. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15. Flesch, R. 1951. How to test readability. New York: Harper & Row.
16. Halliday, M. A. K., and R. Hasan. 1976. Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
17. Horning, A. 1991. Readable writing: The role of cohesion and redundancy. Journal of Advanced Composition 11(Winter): 35-45.
18. Hubbard, R. G., and A. P. O'Brien. 2013. Macroeconomics. 4th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. http://instructors.coursesmart.com/ macroeconomics-fourth-edition/r-glenn-hubbard-anthony-patrick-o-brien/dp/ 9780132832250.
19. Irwin, J. W. 1980. The effect of linguistic cohesion on prose comprehension. Journal of Reading Behavior 12(Winter): 323-32.
20. Kincaid, J. P., R. P. Fishburne Jr., R. L. Rogers, and B. S. Chissom. 1975. Derivation of new readability formulas (Automated Readability Index, Fog Count and Flesch Reading Ease Formula) for Navy enlisted personnel. Research Branch Report 8-75, U.S. Naval Air Station Memphis. Millington, TN: Naval Technical Training Command.
21. Krugman, P., and R. Wells. 2013. Economics. 3rd ed. New York: Worth. http://instructors.coursesmart.com/economics-third-edition/krugman-paul-wells- robin/dp/9781464103865.
22. Landauer, T. K., and S. T. Dumais. 1997. A solution to Plato's problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of the acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review 104: 211-40.
23. Landauer, T. K., P. W. Foltz, and D. Laham. 1998. An introduction to latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes 25: 259-84.
24. Larkin, J. H., and H. A. Simon. 1987. Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cognitive Science 11: 65-99.
25. Louviere, J. J., D. A. Hensher, and J. D. Swait. 2000. Stated choice methods: Analysis and applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
26. Mankiw, N. G. 2012. Principles of macroeconomics. 6th ed. Mason, OH: Cengage Learning. http://instructors. coursesmart.com/principles-of- macroeconomics/mankiw/dp/9780538453066.
27. McConnell, C. R. 1982. Readability formulas as applied to college economics textbooks. Journal of Reading 26(1): 14-17.
28. 1983. Readability: Blind faith in numbersJournal of Economic Education 14: 65-71.
29. 1998. Reflections on the principles course. In Teaching undergraduate economics: A handbook for instructors, ed. W. B. Walstad and P. Saunders, 31-42. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
30. McConnell, C. R., S. L. Brue, and S. M. Flynn. 2012. Macroeconomics. 19th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill. http://instructors.coursesmart.com/macroeconomics- 19th-edition/mcconnell-campbell-brue-stanley-flynn-sean/dp/0077337875.
31. McNamara, D. S., E. Kintsch, N. Butler Songer, and W. Kintsch. 1996. Are good texts always betterInteractions of text coherence, background knowledge, and levels of understanding in learning from text. Cognition and Instruction 14(1): 1-43.
32. McNamara, D. S., M. M. Louwerse, and P. McCarthy. 2010. Coh-Metrix: Capturing linguistic features of cohesion. Discourse Process: A Multidisciplinary Journal 4: 292-330.
33. McNamara, D. S., Y. Ozuru, A. C. Graesser, and M. Louwerse. 2006. Validating Coh-Metrix. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, ed. R. Sun and N. Miyake, 573-78. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
34. Miller, G. A. 1995. WordNet: A lexical database for English. Communications of the ACM 38(11): 39-41.
35. Miller, R. L. 2012. Economics today: The macro view. 16th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. http://instructors. coursesmart.com/economics- today-the-macro-view-sixteenth/roger-leroy-miller/dp/9780132554527.
36. Munro, R., S. Bethard, V. Kuperman, V. T. Lai, R. Melnick, C. Potts, T. Schnoebelen, and H. Tilya. 2010. Crowdsourcing and language studies: The new generation of linguistic data. Proceedings of the NAACL HLT 2010 Workshop on Creating Speech and Language Data with Amazon's Mechanical Turk, 122-30. Stroudsburg, PA: The Association for Computational Linguistics.
37. Oppenheimer, D. M., T. Meyvis, and N. Davidenko. 2009. Instructional manipulation checks: Detecting satisficing to increase statistical power. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 45: 867-72.
38. Rennekamp, K. M. 2012. Processing fluency and investors' reactions to disclosure readability. Journal of Accounting Research 50(5): 1319-54.
39. Ross, J., L. Irani, M. S. Silberman, A. Zaldivar, and B. Tomlinson. 2010. Who are the crowdworkersShifting demographics in Mechanical Turk. alt. CHI session of CHI 2010 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems proceeding, Atlanta, GA, April 10-15, 2863-72. New York: Association for Computing Machinery (ACM).
40. Schnoebelen, T., and V. Kuperman. 2010. Using Amazon Mechanical Turk for linguistic research. PSIHOLOGIJA 43(4): 441-64.
41. University of Memphis. n.d. Coh-Metrix andCoh-Git. http://cohmetrix. memphis.edu/cohmetrixpr/metgit.html.Memphis, TN: University of Memphis, Department of Psychology (accessed September 10, 2012).
42. Watts, M., and G. Schaur. 2011. Teaching and assessment methods in undergraduate economics: A fourth national quinquennial survey. Journal of Economic Education 42(3): 294-309.
43. Word Count.org. n.d. www.wordcount.org/main.php (accessed September 13, 2012).