Caesarean section and subsequent ectopic pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Volumn 120, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 671-680

  O'Neill, S M ^a   Khashan, A S ^a   Kenny, L C ^a   Greene, R A ^a   Henriksen, T B ^b   Lutomski, J E ^a   Kearney, P M ^c  

^a Irish Centre for Fetal and Neonatal Translational Research   (Ireland)

^b AARHUS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

^c UNIVERSITY COLLEGE CORK   (Ireland)

Author keywords

Caesarean; ectopic pregnancy; meta analysis; systematic review

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CESAREAN SECTION; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; COHORT ANALYSIS; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; ECTOPIC PREGNANCY; GENETIC HETEROGENEITY; HOSPITAL BASED CASE CONTROL STUDY; HUMAN; MARRIAGE; META ANALYSIS; PARITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; RISK FACTOR; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; VAGINAL DELIVERY;

CESAREAN SECTION; DELIVERY, OBSTETRIC; FEMALE; HUMANS; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY, ECTOPIC; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 84876099205     PISSN: 14700328     EISSN: 14710528     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.12165     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Barnhart KT, Sammel MD, Gracia CR, Chittams J, Hummel AC, Shaunik A,. Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy in women with symptomatic first-trimester pregnancies. Fertil Steril 2006; 86: 36-43.
2. Bouyer J, Coste J, Shojaei T, Pouly JL, Fernandez H, Gerbaud L, et al. Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy: a comprehensive analysis based on a large case-control, population-based study in France. Am J Epidemiol 2003; 157: 185.
3. Kamwendo F, Forslin L, Bodin L, Danielsson D,. Epidemiology of ectopic pregnancy during a 28 year period, the role of pelvic inflammatory disease. Sex Transm Infect 2000; 76: 28-32.
4. Bardis N, Maruthini D, Balen AH,. Modes of conception, multiple pregnancy: a national survey of babies born during one week in 2003 in the Kingdom United. Fertil Steril 2005; 84: 1727-32.
5. Rajkhowa M, Glass MR, Rutherford AJ, Balen AH, Sharma V, Cuckle HS,. Trends in the incidence of ectopic pregnancy in England Wales from 1966 to 1996. BJOG 2000; 107: 369-74.
6. Khan KS, Wojdyla D, Say L, Gülmezoglu AM, Van Look PFA,. WHO analysis of causes of maternal death: a systematic review. The Lancet 2006; 367: 1066-74.
7. Chang J, Elam-Evans LD, Berg CJ, Herndon J, Flowers L, Seed KA, et al. Pregnancy-related mortality surveillance-United States, 1991-1999. MMWR Surveill Summ 2003; 52: 1-8.
8. AbouZahr C,. Global burden of maternal death, disability. Br Med Bull 2003; 67: 1-11.
9. Rubin GL, Peterson HB, Dorfman SF, Layde PM, Maze JM, Ory HW, et al. Ectopic pregnancy in the United States 1970 through 1978. JAMA 1983; 249: 1725-9.
10. Nederlof KP, Lawson H, Saftlas A, Atrash H, Finch E,. Ectopic pregnancy surveillance, United States, 1970-1987. MMWR CDC Surveill Summ 1990; 39: 9.
11. Saraiya M, Berg CJ, Kendrick JS, Strauss LT, Atrash HK, Ahn YW,. Cigarette smoking as a risk factor for ectopic pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998; 178: 493-8.
12. Coste J, Job-Spira N, Fernandez H,. Increased risk of ectopic pregnancy with maternal cigarette smoking. Am J Public Health 1991; 81: 199.
13. Marcus SF, Brinsden PR,. Analysis of the incidence, risk factors associated with ectopic pregnancy following in-vitro fertilization, embryo transfer. Hum Reprod 1995; 10: 199.
14. Marchbanks PA, Annegers JF, Coulam CB, Strathy JH, Kurland LT,. Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy. JAMA 1988; 259: 1823.
15. Parazzini F, Tozzi L, Ferraroni M, Bocciolone L, La Vecchia C, Fedele L,. Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy: an Italian case-control study. Obstet Gynecol 1992; 80: 821.
16. Weström L, Bengtsson LP, Mårdh P,. Incidence, trends, risks of ectopic pregnancy in a population of women. BMJ (Clinical research ed.) 1981; 282: 15.
17. Edelman D, Porter C,. The intrauterine device, ectopic pregnancy. Adv Contracept 1986; 2: 55-63.
18. Stubbs E, Schamp A,. The evidence is in Why are IUDs still out? Can Fam Physician 2008; 54: 560.
19. Sivin I,. IUDs, ectopic pregnancy. Stud Fam Plann 1983; 14: 57-63.
20. Bastianelli C, Lucantoni V, Valente A, Farris M, Lippa A, Dionisi B, Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy. Case-control study. Minerva Ginecol 1998; 50: 469-73.
21. Hemminki E, Merilainen J,. Long-term effects of cesarean sections: ectopic pregnancies, placental problems. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996; 174: 1569-74.
22. Hemminki E,. Long term maternal health effects of caesarean section. J Epidemiol Community Health 1991; 45: 24-8.
23. Michalas S, Minaretzis D, Tsionou C, Maos G, Kioses E, Aravantinos D,. Pelvic surgery, reproductive factors, risk of ectopic pregnancy: a case controlled study. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1992; 38: 101-5.
24. Tower CL, Strachan BK, Baker PN,. Long-term implications of caesarean section. J Obstet Gynaecol 2000; 20: 365-7.
25. Mollison J, Porter M, Campbell D, Bhattacharya S,. Primary mode of delivery, subsequent pregnancy. BJOG 2005; 112: 1061-5.
26. Ananth CV, Smulian JC, Vintzileos AM,. The association of placenta previa with history of cesarean delivery, abortion: a metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 177: 1071-8.
27. Matthews T, Crowley P, Chong A, McKenna P, McGarvey C, O'Regan M,. Rising caesarean section rates: a cause for concern? BJOG 2003; 110: 346-9.
28. Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD, Rennie D, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology. JAMA 2000; 283: 2008.
29. McDonald SD, Han Z, Mulla S, Murphy KE, Beyene J, Ohlsson A,. Preterm birth, low birth weight among in vitro fertilization singletons: a systematic review, meta-analyses. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2009; 146: 138-48.
30. Karaer A, Avsar FA, Batioglu S,. Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy: a case-control study. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2006; 46: 521-7.
31. Kendrick JS, Tierney EF, Lawson HW, Strauss LT, Klein L, Atrash HK,. Previous cesarean delivery, the risk of ectopic pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 1996; 87: 297-301.
32. LaSala A, Berkeley A,. Primary cesarean section, subsequent fertility. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987; 157: 379.
33. Nordenskjöld F, Ahlgren M,. Risk Factors in Pregnancy Results Ectopic of Based Population Study Case A Control. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1991; 7: 575-9.
34. Tuomivaara L, Kauppila A,. Ectopic pregnancy: a case-control study of aetiological risk factors. Arch Gynecol Obstet 1988; 243: 5-11.
35. Chaliha C, Digesu A, Hutchings A, Soligo M, Khullar V,. Caesarean section is protective against stress urinary incontinence: an analysis of women with multiple deliveries. BJOG 2004; 111: 754-5.
36. Press JZ, Klein MC, Kaczorowski J, Liston RM, Von Dadelszen P,. Does cesarean section reduce postpartum urinary incontinence? A systematic review. Birth 2007; 34: 228-37.
37. James D,. Caesarean section for fetal distress. BMJ 2001; 322: 1316-7.
38. Gherman RB, Chauhan S, Ouzounian JG, Lerner H, Gonik B, Goodwin TM,. Shoulder dystocia: the unpreventable obstetric emergency with empiric management guidelines. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 195: 657-72.
39. Henderson J, McCandlish R, Kumiega L, Petrou S,. Systematic review of economic aspects of alternative modes of delivery. BJOG 2001; 108: 149-57.
40. Shearer EL,. Cesarean section: medical benefits, costs. Soc Sci Med 1993; 37: 1223-31.
41. MacDorman MF, Menacker F, Declercq E,. Cesarean birth in the United States: epidemiology, trends, outcomes. Clin Perinatol 2008; 35: 293-307.
42. NICE. Caesarean Section: Full Guideline DRAFT 2011. London: National Insitute for Health, Clinical Excellence, 2011. pp. 266.