Primary mode of delivery and subsequent pregnancy

BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Volumn 112, Issue 8, 2005, Pages 1061-1065

  Mollison, J ^a,c   Porter, M ^b   Campbell, D ^b   Bhattacharya, S ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CESAREAN SECTION; COHORT ANALYSIS; DELIVERY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTAL DELIVERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MULTIPARA; NATURAL CHILDBIRTH; POPULATION RESEARCH; PREGNANCY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VAGINAL DELIVERY; FAMILY PLANNING; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; STATISTICS; TIME; UNITED KINGDOM;

ADULT; BIRTH INTERVALS; CESAREAN SECTION; COHORT STUDIES; DELIVERY, OBSTETRIC; FEMALE; HUMANS; PREGNANCY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SCOTLAND; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 24344465899     PISSN: 14700328     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00651.x     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Thomas J, Paranjothy S, Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Clinical Effectiveness Unit. National Sentinel Caesarean Section Audit Report. London: RCOG Press, 2001.
2. National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Caesarean section. NICE Clinical Guideline 13. London: National Institute for Clinical Excellence, 2004:7.
3. Hall M, Campbell DM, Fraser C, Lemon J. Mode of delivery and future fertility. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1989;96:1297-1303.
4. Hemminki E, Graubard BI, Hoffman HJ, Mosher WD, Fetterly K. Cesarean section and subsequent fertility: results from the 1982 National Survey of Family Growth. Fertil Steril 1985;43:520-528.
5. Jolly J, Walker J, Bhabra K. Subsequent obstetric performance related to primary mode of delivery. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1999;106:227-232.
6. Murphy D, Stirrat GM, Heron J, ALSPAC Study Team. The relationship between caesarean section and subfertility in a population-based sample of 15,541 pregnancies. Hum Reprod 2002;17:1914-1917.
7. Bahl R, Strachan B, Murphy D. Outcome of subsequent pregnancy three years after previous operative delivery in the second stage of labour: cohort study. BMJ 2004;328:311-314.
8. Samphier M, Thompson B. The Aberdeen maternity and neonatal databank. In: Mednick SA, Baert AE, editors. Prospective Longitudinal Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1981:61-65.
9. Hemminki E. Impact of caesarean section on future pregnancy-a review of cohort studies. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 1996;10:366-379.
10. Kadar N, Romero R. Prognosis for future childbearing after mid cavity instrumental deliveries in primigravidas. Obstet Gynecol 1983;62:166-170.
11. Pandian Z, Bhattacharya S, Templeton A. Review of unexplained infertility and obstetric outcome: a 10 year review. Hum Reprod 2001;16:2593-2597.
12. Thompson F, Shanbhag S, Templeton A, Bhattacharya S. Obstetric outcome in women with subfertility [on-line]. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2004 (December 2).
13. Porter M, Bhattacharya S, van Teijlingen E, Templeton A. Does caesarean section cause infertility? Hum Reprod 2003;18:1983-1986.
14. Porter M, Bhattacharya S, van Teijlingen E, et al. A population-based cohort study of the relevance of operative delivery to future fertility: analysis of qualitative data. Fertility 2003 [Conference Proceeding]. Aberdeen Scotland, 2003.