Long-term implications of caesarean section

Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 365-367

  Tower, Clare L ^a   Strachan, B K ^a   Baker, P N ^a  

^a NOTTINGHAM CITY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CESAREAN SECTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ECTOPIC PREGNANCY; FEMALE; FEMALE FERTILITY; FETUS WEIGHT; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NORMAL HUMAN; PARITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPONTANEOUS ABORTION; STATISTICS; SUBFERTILITY;

EID: 0033856831     PISSN: 01443615     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01443610050111959     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Francome C. and Savage W. (1993) Caesarean section in Britain and the United States 12% or 24%: which is the right rate? Social Science and Medicine, 37, 1199-1218.
2. Hall M. H., Campbell D. M., Fraser C. and Lemon J. (1989) Mode of delivery and future fertility. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 96, 1297-1303.
3. Hemminki E. (1996) Impact of caesarean section on future pregnancy - a review of cohort studies. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 10, 366-379.
4. Hemminki E. and Merilainen J. (1996) Long term effects of cesarean sections: ectopic pregnancies and placental problems. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 174, 1569-1574.
5. Hemminki E., Graubard B. I., Hoffman H. J., Mosher W. D. and Fetterly K. (1985) Cesarean section and subsequent fertility: results from the 1982 National Survey of Family Growth. Fertility and Sterility, 43, 520-528.
6. Sachs B. P., Kobelin C., Castro M. A. and Frigoletto F. (1999) The risks of lowering the cesarean-delivery rate. New England Journal of Medicine, 340, 54-57.
7. Zdeb M. S., Therriault G. D. and Logrillo V. M. (1984) Frequency, spacing and outcome of pregnancies subsequent to primary cesarean childbirth. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 150, 205-212.