Usage bibliometrics

Annual Review of Information Science and Technology

Volumn 44, Issue , 2010, Pages 1-64

  Kurtz, Michael J ^a   Bollen, Johan ^b  

^a HARVARD SMITHSONIAN CENTER FOR ASTROPHYSICS   (United States)

^b LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79960500443     PISSN: 00664200     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1002/aris.2010.1440440108     Document Type: Review

References (171)

1. Abt, H. A. (2007). The publication rate of scientific papers depends only on the number of scientists. Scientometrics, 73(3), 281-288.
2. Accomazzi, A., Eichhorn, G., Kurtz, M., Grant, C, & Murray, S. (2000). The NASA Astrophysics Data System: Architecture. Astronomy & Astrophysics Supplement Series, 143(1), 85-109.
3. Aggarwal, C. C, & Yu, P. S. (1998). Mining large itemsets for association rules. IEEE Data Engineering Bulletin, 21(1), 23-31.
4. Baldi, S. (1998). Normative versus social constructivist processes in the allocation of citations: A network-analytic model. American Sociological Review, 63(6), 829-846.
5. Bar-Ilan, J. (2008). Informetrics at the beginning of the 21st century: A review. Journal of Informetrics, 2(1), 1-52.
6. Bekaert, J., & Van De Sompel, H. (2005). Access interfaces for open archival information systems based on the OAI-PMH and the OpenURL framework for context-sensitive services. Symposium on ensuring long-term preservation and adding value to scientific and technical data (PV 2005), Edinburgh, November 2005. Retrieved May 21, 2009, from www.ukoln. ac.uk/events/pv-2005/pv-2005- final-papers/032.pdf
7. Bensman, S. (2001). Urquhart's and Garfield's laws: The British controversy over their validity. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(9), 714-724.
8. Bertot, J., McClure, C, Moen, W., & Rubin, J. (1997). Web usage statistics: Measurement issues and analytical techniques. Government Information Quarterly, 14(4), 373-395.
9. Blecic, D. D., Fiscella, J. B., & Wiberley, S. E., Jr. (2007). Measurement of use of electronic resources: Advances in use statistics and innovations in resource functionality. College & Research Libraries, 68(1), 26-44.
10. Bollen, J., Luce, R., Vemulapalli, S., & Xu, W. (2003). Usage analysis for the identification of research trends in digital libraries. D-Lib Magazine, 9 (5). Retrieved March 1, 2009, from www.dlib.org/dlib/may03/bollen/ 05bollen. html
11. Bollen, J., Rodriguez, M. A., & Van De Sompel, H. (2006). Journal status. Scientometrics, 69, 669-687.
12. Bollen, J., & Van De Sompel, H. (2006a). An architecture for the aggregation and analysis of scholarly usage data. Proceedings of the 6th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, 298-307.
13. Bollen, J., & Van De Sompel, H. (2006b). Mapping the structure of science through usage. Scientometrics, 69(2), 227-258.
14. Bollen, J., & Van De Sompel, H. (2008). Usage impact factor: The effects of sample characteristics on usage-based impact metrics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(1), 136-149.
15. Bollen, J., Van De Sompel, H., Hagberg, A., Bettencourt, L., Chute, R., Rodriguez, M. A., et al. (2009a). Clickstream data yields high-resolution maps of science. PLoS ONE, 4(3), e4803. Retrieved March 1, 2009, from doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0004803
16. Bollen J., Van De Sompel, H., Hagberg, A., & Chute, R. (2009b). A principal component analysis of 39 scientific impact measures. PLoS ONE, 4(6), e6022. Retrieved June 30, 2009, from doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0006022
17. Bollen, J., Van De Sompel, H., & Rodriguez., M. A. (2008). Towards usage-based impact metrics: First results from the MESUR project. Proceedings of the 8th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, 231-240.
18. Bollen, J., Van De Sompel, H., Smith, J., & Luce, R. (2005). Toward alternative metrics of journal impact: A comparison of download and citation data. Information Processing & Management, 41(6), 1419-1440.
19. Bonitz, M. (1997). The scientific talents of nations. Libri, 47(4), 206-213.
20. Borgman, C, Hirsh, S., & Hiller, J. (1996). Rethinking online monitoring methods for information retrieval systems: From search product to search process. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 47(7), 568-583.
21. Borner, K., Chen, C, & Boyack, K. W. (2003). Mapping science. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 37, 179-255.
22. Borner, K., Sanyal, S., & Vespignani, A. (2007). Network science. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 41, 537-607.
23. Boyack, K. W., Klavans, R., & Börner, K. (2005). Mapping the backbone of science. Scientometrics, 64(3), 351-374.
24. ® for science and technology management. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(9), 764-774.
25. Brin, S., & Page, L. (1998). The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual Web search engine. Computer Networks and ISDN Systems, 30(1-7), 107-117.
26. Broadus, R. F. (1977). The application of citation analysis to library collection building. Advances in Librarianship, 7, 299-335.
27. Broadus, R. F. (1987). Toward a definition of bibliometrics. Scientometrics, 12(5-6), 373-379.
28. Brody, T., Carr, L., Gingras, Y., Hajjem, C, Harnad, S., & Swan, A. (2007). Incentivising the open access research Web: Publication-archiving, data-archiving, and scientometrics. CTWatch Quarterly, 3(3), 42-50.
29. Brody, T., Harnad, S., & Carr, L. (2006). Earlier Web usage statistics as predictors of later citation impact. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(8), 1060-1072.
30. Brookes, B. C. (1976). Citation v. usage of serials. Journal of Documentation, 32(4), 320-322.
31. Burton, R., & Kebler, R. (1960). The half-life of some scientific and technical literatures. American Documentation, 11(1), 18-22.
32. Castellano, C, Fortunate, S., & Loreto, V. (2009). Statistical physics of social dynamics. Reviews of Modern Physics, 81, 591-646.
33. Chen, C. (2006). Citespace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(3), 359-377.
34. Cooper, M., & McGregor, G. (1994). Using article photocopy data in bibliographic models for journal collection management. Library Quarterly, 64(4), 386-413.
35. Craig, I. D., Plume, A. M., McVeigh, M. E., Pringle, J., & Amin, M. (2007). Do open access articles have greater citation impact? A critical review of the literature. Journal of Informetrics, 7(3), 239-248.
36. Cronin, B. (1984). The citation process: The role and significance of citations in scientific communication. London: Taylor Graham.
37. Cronin, B. (2001). Bibliometrics and beyond: Some thoughts on Web-based citation analysis. Journal of Information Science, 27(1), 1-7.
38. Cronin, B. (2005). A hundred million acts of whimsy? Current Science, 89(9), 1505-1509.
39. Darmoni, S., Roussel, F., & Benichou, J. (2002). Reading factor: A new bibliometric criterion for managing digital libraries. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 90(3), 323-327.
40. Davis, P. (2002). Patterns in electronic journal usage: Challenging the composition of geographic consortia. College & Research Libraries, 63(6), 484-497.
41. Davis, P. M. (2009). Author-choice open-access publishing in the biological and medical literature: A citation analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(1), 3-8.
42. Davis, P. M., & Fromerth, M. J. (2007). Does the arXiv lead to higher citations and reduced publisher downloads for mathematics articles? Scientometrics, 71(2), 203-215.
43. Davis, P. M., Lewenstein, B. V, Booth, J. G., & Connolly, M. J. (2008). Open access publishing, article downloads and citations: Randomised trial. British Medical Journal, 337, 586.
44. Davis, P. M., & Price, J. S. (2006). eJournal interface can influence usage statistics: Implications for libraries, publishers, and project COUNTER. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(9), 1243-1248.
45. Drott, M. C. (2006). Open access. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 40, 79-109.
46. Duy, J., & Vaughan, L. (2006). Can electronic journal usage data replace citation data as a measure of journal use? An empirical examination. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 32(5), 512-517.
47. Eason, K., Richardson, S., & Yu, L. (2000). Patterns of use of electronic journals. Journal of Documentation, 56(5), 477-504.
48. Egghe, L., & Rousseau, R. (2000). Aging, obsolescence, impact, growth, and utilization: Definitions and relations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, SHU), 1004-1017.
49. Eichhorn, G., Kurtz, M., Accomazzi, A., Grant, C, & Murray, S. (2000). The NASA Astrophysics Data System: The search engine and its user interface. Astronomy & Astrophysics Supplement Series, 143(1), 61-83.
50. Eysenbach, G. (2006). Citation advantage of open access articles. PLoS Biology, 4(5), 692-698.
51. Eysenbach, G. (2008). Word is still out: Publication was premature. British Medical Journal e-letters, 337. Retrieved February 2, 2009, from www.bmj.com/cgi/eletters/337/jul31-1/a56899926
52. Fortunate, S., & Castellano, C. (2007). Scaling and universality in proportional elections. Physical Review Utters, 99(13), 138701.
53. Fowler, D. C. (Ed.). (2007). Usage statistics of e-serials. Binghamton, NY: Hawthorn Press.
54. Freire, J., Silva, C. T., Callahan, S. P., Santos, E., Scheidegger, C. E., & Vo, H. T. (2006). Managing rapidly-evolving scientific workflows. Provenance and Annotation of Data, 4145, 10-18.
55. Galvin, T. J., & Kent, A. (1977). Use of a university library collection: A progress report on a Pittsburgh study. Library Journal, 102(20), 2317-2320.
56. Gardner, W. (1990). The electronic archive: Scientific publishing for the 1990s. Psychological Science, 1(6), 333-341.
57. Garfield, E. (1970). Citation indexing for studying science. Nature, 227, 669-671.
58. Garfield, E. (1972). Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation: Journals can be ranked by frequency and impact of citations for science policy studies. Science, 178(4060), 471-479.
59. Garfield, E. (2006). The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 295(1), 90-93.
60. Gargouri, Y. (2008). L'avantage de citations des articles auto-archivés mandatés. Montreal, Quebec: Cognition and Communication Laboratory, University de Quebec.
61. Georgakopoulos, D., Hornick, M., & Sheth, A. (1995). An overview of workflow management: From process modeling to workflow automation infrastructure. Distributed and Parallel Databases, 3(2), 119-153.
62. Ginsparg, P. (1994). First steps towards electronic research communication. Computers in Physics, 8(4), 390-396.
63. Ginsparg, P. (2001). Creating a global knowledge network. In Electronic Publishing in Science II. Proceedings of the Joint ICSU Press/UNESCO Expert Conference (pp. 99-104). Paris: UNESCO.
64. Ginsparg, P. (2007). Next generation implications of open access. CTWatch Quarterly, 3(3), 11-18.
65. Ginsparg, P., Houle, P., Joachims, T., & Sul, J. H. (2004). Mapping subsets of scholarly information. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101(Suppl. 1), 5236-5240.
66. Goldberg, D., Nichols, D., Oki, B. M., & Terry, D. (1992). Using collaborative filtering to weave an information tapestry. Communications of the ACM, 35(12), 61-70.
67. Gosnell, C. F. (1944). Obsolescence of books in college libraries. College & Research Libraries, 5, 115-125.
68. Grant, C, Accomazzi, A., Eichhorn, G., Kurtz, M., & Murray, S. (2000). The NASA Astrophysics Data System: Data holdings. Astronomy & Astrophysics Supplement Series, 143(1), 111-135.
69. Gross, P. L. K., & Gross, E. M. (1927). College libraries and chemical education. Science, 66, 385-389.
70. Hajjem, C, & Hamad, S. (2005). The open access citation advantage: Quality advantage or quality bias? On-Line Memorandum. Retrieved February 2, 2009, from eprints.ecs.soton. ac.uk/13328
71. Hajjem, C, Harnad, S., & Gingras, Y. (2005). Ten-year cross-disciplinary comparison of the growth of open access and how it increases research citation impact. IEEE Data Engineering Bulletin, 29(4), 39-47.
72. Harnad, S. (1990). Scholarly skywriting and the prepublication continuum of scientific inquiry. Psychological Science, 1(6), 342-344.
73. Hamad, S. (2005). OA impact advantage = EA + (AA) + (QB) + QA + (CA) + UA. On-line Memorandum. Retrieved February 2, 2009, from eprints.ecs.soton. ac.uk/12085
74. Harnad, S. (2006a). The self-archiving impact advantage: Quality advantage or quality bias? On-Line Memorandum. Retrieved February 2, 2009, from openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?%20/archives/168-The-Self-Archiving-Impact- Advantage-Quality-Advantage-or-Quality-Bias.html
75. Harnad, S. (2006b). The special case of astronomy. On-Line Memorandum. Retrieved February 2, 2009, from openaccess.eprints.org/index.php7%20/archives/ 145-The-Special-Case-of-Astronomy.html
76. Harnad, S. (2007a). Citation advantage for OA self-archiving is independent of journal impact factor, article age, and number of co-authors. On-Line Memorandum. Retrieved February 2, 2009, from openaccess.eprints.org/ index.php?%20/archives/192-guid.html
77. Harnad, S. (2007b). Craig et al.'s review of studies on the OA citation advantage. On-Line Memorandum. Retrieved February 2, 2009, from openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?%20/archives/248-Craig-et-al. s-Review-of-Studies-on-the-OA-Citation-Advantage.html
78. Harnad, S. (2007c). The open access citation advantage: Quality advantage or quality bias? On-Line Memorandum. Retrieved February 2, 2009, from openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?%20/archives/191-The-Open-Access-Citation- Advantage-Quality-Advantage-Or-Quality-Bias.html
79. Harnad, S. (2007d). Where there's no access problem there's no open-access advantage. On-Line Memorandum. Retrieved February 2, 2009, from openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?%20/archive8/289-Where-Theres-No-Access- Problem-Theres-No-Open-Access-Advantage.html
80. Harnad, S. (2008). Davis et al's 1-year study of self-selection bias: No self-archiving control, no OA effect, no conclusion. British Medical Journal e-letters, 337. Retrieved February 2, 2009, from www.bmj.com/cgi/eletters/337/ jul31-l/a56899775
81. Harnad, S., & Brody, T. (2004). Comparing the impact of open access (OA) vs. non-OA articles in the same journals. D-Lib, 10 (6). Retrieved March 1, 2009, from www.dlib.org/dlib/june04/harnad/06harnad.html
82. He, D., Goker, A., & Harper, D. J. (2002). Combining evidence for automatic Web session identification. Information Processing & Management, 38(5), 727-742.
83. Heer, J., & Chi, E. H. (2002). Separating the swarm: Categorization methods for user sessions on the Web. Proceedings of the SigChi Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 243-250.
84. Henneken, E. A., Kurtz, M. J., Accomazzi, A., Grant, C. S., Thompson, D., Bohlen, E., et al. (2009). Use of the astronomical literature: A report on usage patterns. Journal of Informetrics, 3, 1-8.
85. Henneken, E. A., Kurtz, M. J., Eichhorn, G., Accomazzi, A., Grant, C, Thompson, D., et al. (2006). Effect of e-printing on citation rates in astronomy and physics. Journal of Electronic Publishing, 9, 2. Retrieved March 1, 2009, from dx.doi.org/10.3998/3336451.0009.202
86. Henneken, E. A., Kurtz, M. J., Eichhorn, G., Accomazzi, A., Grant, C. S., Thompson, D., et al. (2007). E-prints and journal articles in astronomy: A productive co-existence. Learned Publishing, 20, 16-22.
87. Hider, P. (2006). Search goal revision in models of information retrieval. Journal of Information Science, 32(4), 352-361.
88. Hood, W., & Wilson, C. (2005). The relationship of records in multiple databases to their usage or citedness. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(9), 1004-1007.
89. Huntington, P., Nicholas, D., Jamali, H. R., & Tenopir, C. (2006). Article decay in the digital environment: An analysis of usage of OhioLINK by date of publication, employing deep log methods. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(13), 1840-1851.
90. Jamali, H., Nicholas, D., & Huntington, P. (2005). The use and users of scholarly e-journals: A review of log analysis studies. ASLIB Proceedings, 57(6), 554-571.
91. Jansen, B. (2005). Seeking and implementing automated assistance during the search process. Information Processing & Management, 41(4), 909-928.
92. Jansen, B. J. (2006). Search log analysis: What it is, what's been done, how to do it. Library & Information Science Research, 28(3), 407-432.
93. Kaplan, N., & Nelson, M. (2000). Determining the publication impact of a digital library. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(4), 324-339.
94. King, D. (2004). The scientific impact of nations. Nature, 430(6997), 311-316.
95. King, D. W, McDonald, D. D., & Roderer, N. K. (1981). Scientific journals in the United States: Their production, use, and economics. Stroudsburg, PA: Hutchinson Ross Publishing (Academic Press).
96. King, D. W., & Tenopir, C. (1999). Using and reading scholarly literature. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 34, 423-477.
97. King, D. W, Tenopir, C, & Clarke, M. (2006). Measuring total reading of journal articles. D-Lib Magazine, 12 (10). Retrieved March 1, 2009, from www.dlib.org/dlib/october06/king/loking.html
98. Krause, J., Lindqvist, C. M., & Mele, S. (2007). Quantitative study of the geographical distribution of the authorship of high-energy physics journals, oai.cds.cern. ch: 1033099 (Technical Report No. CERN-OPEN-2007-014). Geneva, Switzerland: CERN.
99. Kurtz, M. J. (1992). Second order knowledge: Information retrieval in the terabyte era. In A. Heck & F. Murtagh (Eds.), Astronomy from large databases II (pp. 85-92). Garching bei Muenchen, Germany: European Southwest Observatory.
100. Kurtz, M. J. (2004, February). Restrictive access policies cut readership of electronic research journal articles by a factor of two. Paper presented at National Policies on Open Access (OA) Provision for University Research Output: An International Meeting, Southampton, UK.
101. Kurtz, M. J., Eichhorn, G., Accomazzi, A., Grant, C, Demleitner, M., Henneken, E., et al. (2005). The effect of use and access on citations. Information Processing & Management, 41(6), 1395-1402.
102. Kurtz, M. J., Eichhorn, G., Accomazzi, A., Grant, C, Demleitner, M., & Murray, S. (2005). Worldwide use and impact of the NASA astrophysics data system digital library. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(1), 36-45.
103. Kurtz, M. J., Eichhorn, G., Accomazzi, A., Grant, C, Demleitner, M., Murray, S., et al. (2005). The bibliometric properties of article readership information. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(2), 111-128.
104. Kurtz, M. J., Eichhorn, G., Accomazzi, A., Grant, C. S., Henneken, E. A., Thompson, D. M., et al. (2003). The myADS update service. Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, 35, 1241.
105. Kurtz, M. J., Eichhorn, G., Accomazzi, A., Grant, C. S., & Murray, S. S. (1996). Journal citations: An ADS-AAS collaboration. Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, 28, 1281.
106. Kurtz, M. J., Eichhorn, G., Accomazzi, A., Grant, C. S., & Murray, S. S. (1997). The relative effectiveness of astronomy journals. Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, 29, 1236.
107. Kurtz, M. J., Eichhorn, G., Accomazzi, A., Grant, C. S., & Murray, S. S. (2002). Second order bibliometric operators in the Astrophysics Data System. In J.-L. Starck & F. D. Murtagh (Eds.), Astronomical Data Analysis II. Proceedings of the SPIE (Vol. 4847, pp. 238-245). Bellingham, WA: International Society for Optical Engineering.
108. Kurtz, M. J., Eichhorn, G., Accomazzi, A., Grant, C, Murray, S. S., & Watson, J. (2000). The NASA astrophysics data system: Overview. Astronomy & Astrophysics Supplement Series, 143(1), 41-59.
109. Kurtz, M. J., & Henneken, E. A. (2007). Open access does not increase citations for research articles from the Astrophysical Journal. ArXiv e-prints, 709. Retrieved February 2, 2009, from arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0709/0709. 0896.pdf
110. Kurtz, M. J., Karakashian, T, Grant, C. S., Eichhorn, G, Murray, S. S., Watson, J. M., et al. (1993). Intelligent text retrieval in the NASA Astrophysics Data System. In R. J. Hanisch, R. J. V. Brissenden, & J. Barnes (Eds.), Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems II (Vol. 52, pp. 132-136). San Francisco: Astronomical Society of the Pacific.
111. Ladwig, J., & Sommese, A. (2005). Using cited half-life to adjust download statistics. College & Research Libraries, 66(6), 527-542.
112. Lawrence, S. (2001). Free online availability substantially increases a paper's impact. Nature, 411(6837), 521.
113. Leydesdorff, L. (1994). The generation of aggregated journal-journal citation maps on the basis of the CD-ROM version of the Science Citation Index. Scientometrics, 31 (59-84).
114. Leydesdorff, L. (2007). Betweenness centrality as an indicator of the interdisciplinarity of scientific journals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(9), 1303-1319.
115. Leydesdorff, L. (2008). The delineation of nanoscience and nanotechnology in terms of journals and patents: A most recent update. Scientometrics, 76(1), 159-167.
116. Line, M. (1993). Changes in the use of literature with time: Obsolescence revisited. Library Trends, 41(4), 665-683.
117. Line, M., & Sandison, A. (1975). Practical interpretation of citation and library use studies. College & Research Libraries, 36(5), 393-396.
118. Liu, M. (1993). Progress in documentation: The complexities of citation practice: A review of citation studies. Journal of Documentation, 49(4), 370-408.
119. Ludascher, B., & Goble, C. (2005). Guest editors' introduction to the special section on scientific workflows. SIGMOD Record, 34(3), 3-4.
120. Luther, J. (2000). White paper on electronic journal usage statistics. Washington, DC: Council on Library and Information Resources.
121. MacRoberts, M. H., & MacRoberts, B. R. (1987). Another test of the normative theory of citing. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 38, 305-306.
122. May, R. (1997). The scientific wealth of nations. Science, 275(5301), 793-796.
123. Mayr, P. (2006). Constructing experimental indicators for open access documents. Research Evaluation, 15(2), 127-132.
124. McDonald, J. D. (2007). Understanding journal usage: A statistical analysis of citation and use. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(1), 39-50.
125. Meadows, J. (2005). A practical line in bibliometrics. Interlending & Document Supply, 33(2), 90-94.
126. Merton, R. (1968). The Matthew effect in science. Science, 159(3810), 56-63.
127. Mobasher, B., Dai, H., Luo, T., & Nakagawa, M. (2001). Effective personalization based on association rule discovery from Web usage data. Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Web Information and Data Management, 9-15.
128. Moed, H. F. (2005). Statistical relationships between downloads and citations at the level of individual documents within a single journal. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(10), 1088-1097.
129. Moed, H. F. (2007). The effect of "open access" on citation impact: An analysis of ArXiVs condensed matter section. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(13), 2047-2054.
130. Moed, H. F., Van Leeuwen, T., & Reedijk, J. (1998). Anew classification system to describe the ageing of scientific journals and their impact factors. Journal of Documentation, 54(4), 387-419.
131. Moya-Anegón, F. D., Vargas-Quesada, B., Chinchilla- Rodrìguez, Z., Corera-Álvarez, E., Munoz-Fernández, F. J., & Herrero-Solana, V. V. (2007). Visualizing the marrow of science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(14), 2167-2179.
132. Nicholas, D., Huntington, P., Dobrowolski, T., Rowlands, I., Jamali, M., & Polydoratou, P. (2005). Revisiting "obsolescence" and journal article "decay" through usage data: An analysis of digital journal use by year of publication. Information Processing & Management, 41(6), 1441-1461.
133. Norris, M., Oppenheim, C, & Rowland, F. (2008). The citation advantage of open-access articles. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(12), 1963-1972.
134. Pan, E. (1978). Journal citation as a predictor of journal usage in libraries. Collection Management, 2, 29-38.
135. Parker, R. (1982). Bibliometric models for management of an information store 2: Use as a function of age of material. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 33(3), 129-133.
136. Peters, T. A. (2002). What's the use? The value of e-resource usage statistics. New Library World, 103(1172/1173), 39-47.
137. Pinski, G., & Narin, F. (1976). Citation influence for journal aggregates of scientific publications: Theory, with application to the literature of physics. Information Processing & Management, 12(5), 297-312.
138. Pirolli, P., & Pitkow, J. E. (1999). Distributions of surfers' paths through the World Wide Web: Empirical characterization. World Wide Web, 2(1-2), 29-45.
139. Price, D. J. D. (1965a). Networks of scientific papers. Science, 149(3683), 510-515.
140. Price, D. J. D. (1965b). Scientific foundations of science policy. Nature, 206(4981), 233-238.
141. Price, D. J. D. (1976). General theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 27(5-6), 292-306.
142. Rice, B. A. (1979). Science periodicals use study. Serials Librarian, 4(1), 35-47.
143. Rodriguez, M. A., Bollen, J., & Van De Sompel, H. (2007). A practical ontology for the largescale modeling of scholarly artifacts and their usage. Proceedings of the 7th ACMIIEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, 278-287.
144. Rosvall, M., & Bergstrom, C. T. (2008). Maps of random walks on complex networks reveal community structure. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 105, 1118-1123.
145. Rowlands, I. (2007). Electronic journals and user behavior: A review of recent research. Library & Information Science Research, 29(3), 369-396.
146. Rowlands, I., & Nicholas, D. (2007). The missing link: Journal usage metrics. Aslib Proceedings, 59(3), 222-228.
147. Saka, A., & Igami, M. (2007). Mapping modern science using co-citation analysis. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference Information Visualization, 453-458.
148. Scales, R. A. (1976). Citation analyses as indicators of use of serials: Comparison of ranked title lists produced by citation counting and from use data. Journal of Documentation, 32(1), 17-25.
149. Shapiro, F. R. (Ed.). (2006). The Yale book of quotations. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
150. Shepherd, R. T. (2007). The feasibility of developing and implementing journal usage factors: A research project sponsored by UKSG. Serials, 20(2), 117-123.
151. Singh, V., Gray, J., Thakar, A., Szalay, A. S., Raddick, J., Boroski, B., et al. (2007). SkyServer Traffic Report: The first five years. ArXiv Computer Science e-prints. Retrieved February 2, 2009, from arxiv.org/ftp/cs/papers/0701/ 0701173.pdf
152. Small, H. (1999). Visualizing science by citation mapping. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(9), 799-813.
153. Stankus, T, & Rice, B. A. (1982). Handle with care: Use and citation data for science journal management. Collection Management, 4(1/2), 95-110.
154. Szalay, A., & Gray, J. (2001). The world-wide telescope. Science, 293, 2037-2040.
155. Szalay, A., & Gray, J. (2006). 2020 computing: Science in an exponential world. Nature, 440, 413-414.
156. Tenopir, C, Baker, G., Read, E., Manoff, M., McClanahan, K., Nicholas, D., et al. (2007). Maxdata: A project to help librarians maximize e-journals usage data. In D. C. Fowler (Ed.), Usage statistics of e-serials (pp. 59-82). Binghamton, NY: Hawthorn Information.
157. Tenopir, C, King, D. W., Boyce, P., Grayson, M., & Pulson, K. L. (2005). Relying on electronic journals: Reading patterns of astronomers. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(8), 786-802.
158. Tonta, Y, & Unal, Y. (2005). Scatter of journals and literature obsolescence reflected in document delivery requests. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(1), 84-94.
159. Trimble, V, Aschwanden, M. J., & Hansen, C. J. (2006). Astrophysics in 2005. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 118(845), 947-1047.
160. Trimble, V., Aschwanden, M. J., & Hansen, C. J. (2007). Astrophysics in 2006. Space Science Reviews, 132(1), 1-182.
161. Tsay, M. Y. (1998a). Library journal use and citation half-life in medical science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(14), 1283-1292.
162. Tsay, M. Y. (1998b). The relationship between journal use in a medical library and citation use. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 86(1), 31-39.
163. Van De Sompel, H., & Beit-Arie, O. (2001a). Generalizing the openURL framework beyond references to scholarly works: The Bison-Fute model. D-Lib Magazine, 7 (7/8). Retrieved March 1, 2009, from www.dlib.org/dhb/july01/ vandeaompel/07vandesompel.html
164. Van De Sompel, H., & Beit-Arie, O. (2001b). Open linking in the scholarly information environment using the openURL framework. D-Lib Magazine, 7 (3). Retrieved March 1, 2009, from www.dlib.org/dlib/march01/vandesompel/ 03vandesompel.html
165. Van De Sompel, H., Young, J. A., & Hickey, T. B. (2003). Using the OAI-PMH... Differently. D-Lib Magazine, 9 (7-8). Retrieved March 1, 2009, from www.dhb.org/dhb/july03/young/07young.html
166. Walter, P., & Darling, L. (1996). A journal use study: Checkouts and in house use. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 84(4), 461-467.
167. Wang, P. (1999). Methodologies and methods for user behavioral research. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 34, 53-99.
168. Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
169. White, H., & McCain, K. (1989). Bibliometrics. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 24, 119-186.
170. Wilson, C. (1999). Informetrics. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 34, 107-247.
171. York, D. G., Adelman, J., Anderson, J. E., Jr., Anderson, S. F., Annis, J., Bahcall, N. A., et al. (2000). The Sloan Digital Sky Survey: Technical summary. Astronomical Journal, 120, 1579-1587.