Estimation of a constrained multinomial logit model

Transportation

Volumn 40, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 563-581

  Castro, Marisol ^a   Martínez, Francisco ^a   Munizaga, Marcela A ^a  

^a DEPARTAMENTO DE FÍSICA   (Chile)

Author keywords

Choice set; Discrete choice; Semi compensatory behaviour; Thresholds

Indexed keywords

LOGISTIC REGRESSION;

CHOICE SET; DISCRETE CHOICE; IDENTIFICATION PROBLEM; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD FUNCTION; MULTINOMIAL LOGIT MODEL; SEMI-COMPENSATORY BEHAVIOUR; SYNTHETIC AND REAL DATA; THRESHOLDS;

MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION;

DISCRETE CHOICE ANALYSIS; ESTIMATION METHOD; LOGIT ANALYSIS; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ANALYSIS; MODELING; TRAVEL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 84876078676     PISSN: 00494488     EISSN: 15729435     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11116-012-9435-4     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Bierlaire, M., Hurtubia, R., Flötteröd, G.: An analysis of the implicit choice set generation using the constrained multinomial Logit model. Transp. Res. Rec. 2175, 92-97 (2010).
2. Cantillo, V., de Ortúzar, J. D.: A semi-compensatory discrete choice model with explicit attribute thresholds of perception. Transp Res. 39B, 641-657 (2005).
3. Cascetta, E., Papola, A.: Random utility models with implicit availability/perception of choice alternatives for the simulation travel demand. Transp. Res. 9C, 249-263 (2001).
4. Donoso, P.: Calibración de modelos Logit simple para el corredor Las Condes-Centro. Civil Engineering Thesis, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (1982).
5. Gunn, H. H., Bates, J. J.: Statistical aspects of travel demand modelling. Transp. Res. 16A, 371-382 (1982).
6. Huber, J., Klein, N. M.: Adapting cutoffs to the choice environment: the effects of attribute correlation and reliability. J Consum Res 18, 346-357 (1991).
7. Kaplan, S., Prato, C. G.: Joint modeling of constrained path enumeration and path choice behaviour: a semi-compensatory approach. In: Proceedings of the European Transport Conference, 11-13 Oct, Glasgow (2010).
8. Kaplan, S., Shiftan, Y., Bekhor, S.: Development and estimation of a semi-compensatory model with a flexible error structure. Transp. Res. 46B, 291-304 (2012).
9. Manski, C.: The structure of random utility models. Theory Decis 8, 229-254 (1977).
10. Martínez, F., Hurtubia, R.: Dynamic model for the simulation of equilibrium status in the land use market. Netw Spat Econ 6, 55-73 (2006).
11. Martínez, F., Aguila, L., Hurtubia, R.: The Constrained Multinomial Logit: a semi-compensatory choice model. Transp. Res. 43B, 365-377 (2009).
12. Martínez, F., Tamblay, L., Weintraub, A.: School locations and vacancies: a constrained logit equilibrium model. Environ. Plan. 43A, 1853-1874 (2010).
13. McFadden, D.: The revealed preferences of government bureaucracy. Bell. J. Econ. Manag. Sci. 6, 401-416 (1968).
14. McFadden, D.: Conditional Logit analysis of qualitative choice behaviour. In: Zarembka, P. (ed.) Frontiers in econometrics, pp. 105-142. Academic Press, New York (1974).
15. Munizaga, M. A., Heydecker, B., de Ortúzar, J. D.: Representation of heteroskedasticity in discrete choice models. Transp. Res. 34B, 219-240 (2000).
16. Swait, J.: A non-compensatory choice model incorporating attribute cutoffs. Transp. Res. 35B, 903-928 (2001).
17. Swait, J.: Choice models based on a mixed discrete/continuous PDFs. Transp. Res. 43B, 766-783 (2009).
18. Swait, J., Ben-Akiva, M.: Incorporating random constraints in discrete models of choice set generation. Transp. Res. 21B, 91-102 (1987).
19. Truong, T., Adamowicz, W. L., Boxall, P.: Health risk perception, hunting site choice and chronic wasting disease: modeling the effect of risk on preferences and choice set formation over time. Presented at Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 9-10 June, Seattle (2010).
20. Tversky, A.: Elimination by aspects: a theory of choice. Psychol. Rev. 79, 281-299 (1972).
21. Williams, H. C. W. L., de Ortúzar, J. D.: Behavioural theories of dispersion and the misspecification of travel demand models. Transp. Res. 16B, 167-219 (1982).
22. Zheng, L., Guo, J. Y.: Destination choice model incorporating choice set formation. In: Proceedings of the 87th TRB Annual Meeting, 13-17 Jan, Washington DC (2008).