Representation of heteroskedasticity in discrete choice models

Transportation Research Part B: Methodological

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 219-240

  Munizaga, Marcela A ^a   Heydecker, Benjamin G ^b   Ortúzar, Juan De Dios ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHILE   (Chile)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c PONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DE CHILE   (Chile)

Author keywords

Discrete choice models; Heteroskedasticity; Transport demand

Indexed keywords

ERROR ANALYSIS; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; POLYNOMIALS;

DISCRETE CHOICE MODEL; HETEROSKEDASTICITY;

TRANSPORTATION;

DISCRETE ELEMENT METHOD; PLANNING METHOD; TRANSPORTATION PLANNING;

EID: 0034020983     PISSN: 01912615     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0191-2615(99)00022-3     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Aptech Systems, 1994. GAUSS User's Manuals. Maple Valley.
2. Ben-Akiva, M.E., Bolduc, D., 1996. Multinomial Probit with a Logit kernel and a general parametric specification of the covariance structure. Working Paper, Department d'Economique, Université Laval, Quebec.
3. Ben-Akiva, M.E., Lerman, S.R., 1985. Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
4. Ben-Akiva, M.E., Morikawa, T., 1990a. Estimation of travel demand models from multiple data sources. In: Koshi, M. (Ed.), Transportation and Traffic Theory. Elsevier, New York.
5. Ben-Akiva M.E., Morikawa T. Estimation of switching models from revealed preferences and stated intentions. Transportation Research. 24A(6):1990;485-495.
6. Bhat C.R. A heteroskedastic extreme value model of intercity travel mode choice. Transportation Research. 29B(6):1995;471-483.
7. Bhat C.R. Accommodating flexible substitution patterns in multi-dimensional choice modelling: formulation and application to travel mode and departure time choice. Transportation Research. 32B(7):1998;455-466.
8. Bolduc D. Generalised autoregressive errors in the multinomial Probit model. Transportation Research. 26B(2):1992;155-170.
9. Bolduc D. A practical technique to estimate multinomial Probit models in transportation. Transportation Research. 33B(1):1999;63-79.
10. Börsch-Supan, A., 1990. Recent developments in flexible discrete choice models: nested Logit analysis versus simulated moments Probit analysis. In: Fisher, M.M., Nijkamp, P., Papageorgiou, Y.Y. (Eds.), Behavioural Modelling of Spatial Choices and Processes. North-Holland, Amsterdam.
11. Börsch-Supan A., Hajivassiliou V.A. Smooth unbiased multivariate probability simulators for maximum likelihood estimation of limited dependent variable models. Journal of Econometrics. 58(3):1993;347-368.
12. Bradley, M.A., Daly, A.J., 1997. Estimation of Logit choice models using mixed stated preference and revealed preference information. In: Stopher, P., Lee-Gosselin, M. (Eds.), Understanding Travel Behaviour in an Era of Change. Pergamon Press, Oxford.
13. Daganzo C.F., Bouthelier F., Sheffi Y. Multinomial Probit and qualitative choice: a computationally efficient algorithm. Transportation Science. 11(4):1977;338-358.
14. Daganzo C.F., Kusnic M. Two properties of the nested Logit model. Transportation Science. 27(4):1993;395-400.
15. Daly A.J. Estimating "tree" Logit models. Transportation Research. 21B(4):1987;251-267.
16. Daly, A.J., 1992. ALOGIT 3.2. User's Guide. Hague Consulting Group, The Hague.
17. Garrido, R.A., Mahmassani, H., 1999. Forecasting freight transportation demand with the space-time Multinomial Probit model, Transportation Research B (in press).
18. Gaudry M.J.I., Jara-Díaz S.R., Ortúzar J de D. Value of time sensitivity to model specification. Transportation Research. 23B(2):1989;151-158.
19. Greene, W.H., 1995. LIMDEP Version 7.0 User's Manual. Econometric Software, Bellport.
20. Gumbel, E.J., 1957. Statistics of Extremes. Columbia University Press, New York.
21. Gunn H.F., Bates J.J. Statistical aspects of travel demand modelling. Transportation Research. 16A(5/6):1982;371-382.
22. Hajivassiliou, V.A., McFadden, D., Ruud, P., 1993. Simulation of multivariate normal rectangle probabilities and their derivatives: theoretical and computational results. Working Paper. Cowles Foundation, Yale University.
23. Hensher, D., 1996. Extending valuation to controlled value functions and non-uniform scaling with generalised unobserved variances. Working Paper ITS-WP-96-9, Institute of Transport Studies, The University of Sydney.
24. Hensher, D.A., Johnson, L.W., 1981. Applied Discrete Choice Modelling. Croom Helm, London.
25. Horowitz J.L., Sparmann J.M., Daganzo C.F. An investigation of the accuracy of the Clark approximation for the Multinomial Probit model. Transportation Science. 16(3):1984;383-401.
26. Lam, S.H., Mahmassani, H., 1997. Multinomial Probit model estimation: computational procedures and applications. In: Stopher, P., Lee-Gosselin, M. (Eds.), Understanding Travel Behaviour in an Era of Change. Pergamon Press, Oxford.
27. Lerman, S., Manski, C., 1981. On the use of simulated frequencies to approximate choice probabilities. In: Manski, C., McFadden, D. (Eds.), Structural Analysis of Discrete Data with Econometric Applications. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
28. McFadden, D., 1974. Conditional Logit analysis of qualitative choice behaviour. In: Zarembka, P. (Ed.), Frontiers in Econometrics. Academic Press, New York.
29. McFadden D. A method of simulated moments for estimation of discrete response models without numerical integration. Econometrica. 57(5):1989;995-1026.
30. McFadden, D., Train, T., 1997. Mixed MNL models for discrete response. Working Paper, Department of Economics, University of California at Berkeley.
31. Munizaga, M., 1997. Implicancias de la Naturaleza de los Datos en la Modelación de Elecciones Discretas. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Transport Engineering, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (in Spanish).
32. Ortúzar, J.de D., Garrido, R.A., 1998. Methodological developments. Workshop Report, Eighth International Conference on Travel Behaviour, Austin, Texas.
33. Ortúzar, J.de D., Willumsen, L.G., 1994. Modelling Transport, 2nd ed. Wiley, Chichester.
34. Pakes A., Pollard D. Simulation and the asymptotics of optimisation estimators. Econometrica. 57(5):1989;1027-1057.
35. Pearmain, D., Swanson, J., Kroes, E., Bradley, M., 1991. Stated Preference Techniques: A Guide to Practice. Steer Davies Gleave and Hague Consulting Group, London.
36. Press, W.H., Teukolski, S.A., Vetterling, W.T., Flannery, B.P., 1992. Numerical Recipes in Fortran 77: The Art of Scientific Computing, 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
37. Steckel J.H., Vanhonacker W.R. A heterogeneous conditional Logit model of choice. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics. 6(3):1988;391-398.
38. Stern S. A method for smoothing simulated moments of discrete probabilities in Multinomial Probit models. Econometrica. 60(5):1992;943-952.
39. Train K.E. Recreation demand models with taste differences over people. Land Economics. 74(2):1998;230-239.
40. Williams H.C.W.L. On the formation of travel demand models and economic evaluation measures of user benefit. Environment and Planning. 9A(3):1977;285-344.
41. Williams H.C.W.L., Ortúzar J.de D. Behavioural theories of dispersion and the mis-specification of travel demand models. Transportation Research. 16B(3):1982;167-219.