Choice models based on mixed discrete/continuous PDFs

Transportation Research Part B: Methodological

Volumn 43, Issue 7, 2009, Pages 766-783

  Swait, Joffre ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Choice model; Decision rules; Mixed PDF; Non compensatory behavior; Random utility

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING;

CHOICE MODEL; COMPENSATORY BEHAVIOR; DECISION RULES; MIXED PDF; RANDOM UTILITY;

PROBABILITY DENSITY FUNCTION;

DECISION MAKING; DISCRETE CHOICE ANALYSIS; MODELING; PROBABILITY DENSITY FUNCTION;

EID: 67349193692     PISSN: 01912615     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2009.02.003     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Andrews R., Ainslie A., and Currim I. On the recoverability of choice behaviors with random coefficients choice models in the context of limited data and unobserved effects. Marketing Science 54 1 (2008) 83-99
2. Ben-Akiva M., and Lerman S. Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Predict Travel Demand (1985), MIT Press, Cambridge
3. Ben-Akiva M., and Swait J. The akaike likelihood ratio index. Transportation Science 20 2 (1986) 133-136
4. Cantillo V., and Ortuzar J.D. A semi-compensatory discrete choice model with explicit attribute thresholds of perception. Transportation Research Part B 39 7 (2005) 641-657
5. Cantillo V., Heydecker B., and Ortuzar J.D. A discrete choice model incorporating thresholds for perception in attribute values. Transportation Research Part B 40 9 (2006) 807-825
6. Cascetta E., and Papola A. Random utility models with implicit availability/perception of choice alternatives for the simulation of travel demand. Transportation Research Part C 9 4 (2000) 249-263
7. Daganzo C. Multinomial Probit: The Theory and its Application to Demand Forecasting (1979), Academic Press, New York
8. Dhar R. Consumer preference for a no-choice option. Journal of Consumer Research 24 2 (1997) 215-231
9. Dhar R. Context and task effects on choice deferral. Marketing Letters 8 1 (1997) 119-130
10. Fernandez C., Leon C., Steel M., and Vazquez-Polo F.J. Bayesian analysis of interval data contingent valuation models and pricing policies. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 22 4 (2004) 431-442
11. Fosgerau M., and Bierlaire M. Discrete choice models with multiplicative error terms. Transportation Research Part B 43 5 (2009) 494-505
12. Gilbride T., and Allenby G. A choice model with conjunctive, disjunctive, and compensatory screening rules. Marketing Science 23 3 (2004) 391-406
13. Gopinath, D., 1995. Modeling heterogeneity in discrete choice processes: application to travel demand. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
14. Kamakura W., Kim B., and Lee J. Modeling preference and structural heterogeneity in consumer choice. Marketing Science 15 2 (1996) 152-172
15. Kamakura W., and Russell G. A probabilistic choice model for market segmentation and elasticity structure. Journal of Marketing Research 26 4 (1989) 379-390
16. Manski C. The structure of random utility models. Theory and Decision 8 3 (1977) 229-254
17. Martínez F., Aguila F., and Hurtubia R. The constrained multinomial logit: a semi-compensatory choice model. Transportation Research Part B 43 3 (2009) 365-377
18. McFadden D. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In: Zarembka P. (Ed). Frontiers in Econometrics (1973), Academic Press, New York
19. McFadden D. Modeling the choice of residential location. In: Karlquist A., et al. (Ed). Spatial Interaction Theory and Residential Location (1978), North Holland, Amsterdam 5-96
20. Payne J.W., Bettman J.R., and Johnson E.J. The Adaptive Decision Maker (1993), Cambridge University Press, New York
21. Samuelson W., and Zeckhauser R. Status quo bias in decision making. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 1 1 (1988) 7-59
22. Schwartz B., Ward A., Monterosso J., Lyubomirsky S., White K., and Lehman D. Maximizing versus satisfying: happiness is a matter of choice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 83 5 (2002) 1178-1197
23. Shocker A., Ben-Akiva M., Boccara B., and Nedungadi P. Consideration set influences on consumer decision-making and choice: issues, models, and suggestions. Marketing Letters 2 3 (1991) 181-197
24. Simon H.A. Behavioral model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics 69 1 (1955) 99-118
25. Small K. A discrete choice model for ordered alternatives. Econometrica 55 2 (1987) 409-424
26. Small K. Approximate generalized extreme value models of discrete choice. Journal of Econometrics 62 2 (1994) 351-382
27. Swait, J., 1984. Probabilistic choice set formation in transportation demand models. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
28. Swait J. A structural equation model of latent segmentation and product choice for cross-sectional, revealed preference choice data. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 1 2 (1994) 77-89
29. Swait J. Choice set generation within the generalized extreme value family of discrete choice models. Transportation Research Part B 35 7 (2001) 643-666
30. Swait J. A non-compensatory choice model incorporating attribute cutoffs. Transportation Research Part B 35 10 (2001) 903-928
31. Swait J. Flexible covariance structures for categorical dependent variables through finite mixtures of gev models. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 21 1 (2003) 80-87
32. Swait J., and Adamowicz W. Incorporating the effect of choice environment and complexity into random utility models. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 86 2 (2001) 141-167
33. Swait, J., Ben-Akiva, M., 1985. An analysis of the effects of captivity on travel time and cost elasticities. In: Proceedings of the Annals of the 1985 International Conference on Travel Behavior, April 16-19, Noordwijk, Holland, pp. 113-128.
34. Swait J., and Ben-Akiva M. Incorporating random constraints in discrete choice models of choice set generation. Transportation Research Part B 21B 2 (1987) 91-102
35. Swait J., and Ben-Akiva M. Empirical test of a constrained choice discrete model: mode choice in São Paulo, Brazil. Transportation Research Part B 21B 2 (1987) 103-115
36. Swait, J., Eskeland, G., 1994. The scope for travel mode substitution in São Paulo: estimates and implications for pollution control. Working paper, Policy Research Dept., Public Economics Division, World Bank, Washington, DC.
37. Swait J., Adamowicz V., and van Buren M. Choice and temporal welfare impacts: incorporating history into discrete choice models. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 47 1 (2004) 94-116
38. Wen C.H., and Koppelman F. The generalized nested logit model. Transportation Research Part B 35 7 (2001) 627-641
39. Werner M. Allowing for zeros in dichotomous-choice contingent-valuation models. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 17 4 (1999) 479-486
40. Williams H.C.L. On the formation of travel demand models and economic evaluation measures of user benefit. Environment and Planning A 9 3 (1977) 285-344