Image quality assessment of standard-and low-dose chest ct using filtered back projection, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction, and novel model-based iterative reconstruction algorithms

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 200, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 545-552

  Vardhanabhuti, Varut ^a,b   Loader, Robert J ^a   Mitchell, Grant R ^a   Riordan, Richard D ^a   Roobottom, Carl A ^a,b  

^a DERRIFORD HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PLYMOUTH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction; CT; Iterative reconstruction; Model based iterative reconstruction

Indexed keywords

IOVERSOL;

ADAPTIVE STATISTICAL ITERATIVE RECONSTRUCTION; ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT REDUCTION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DATA ANALYSIS SOFTWARE; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; FILTERED BACK PROJECTION; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KAPPA STATISTICS; LUNG NODULE; MALE; MATHEMATICAL PARAMETERS; MODEL BASED ITERATIVE RECONSTRUCTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; RADIATION DOSE DISTRIBUTION; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SOFT TISSUE DISEASE; STANDARD; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; RADIATION DOSE; RADIATION PROTECTION; RADIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; THORAX RADIOGRAPHY; THORAX TUMOR;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALGORITHMS; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RADIATION DOSAGE; RADIATION PROTECTION; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; RADIOGRAPHY, THORACIC; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; THORACIC NEOPLASMS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 84876036668     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: 15463141     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.12.9424     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Mettler FA, Bhargavan M, Faulkner K, et al. Radiologic and nuclear medicine studies in the United States and worldwide: frequency, radiation dose, and comparison with other radiation sources -1950-2007. Radiology 2009; 253:520-531
2. United Nations. Report of the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation 2010, 57th session: includes scientific report -summary of low-dose radiation effects on health. United Nations Publications website. unp. un.org/Details.aspx?pid=22259. Published 2011. Accessed October 23, 2012
3. Hart D, Wall BF, Hillier MC, Shrimpton PC. Frequency and collective dose for medical and dental x-ray examination in the UK, 2008. London, UK: Health Protection Agency, 2010:52
4. Singh S, Kalra MK, Gilman MD, et al. Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique for radiation dose reduction in chest CT: a pilot study. Radiology 2011; 259:565-573
5. Singh S, Kalra MK, Hsieh J, et al. Abdominal CT: comparison of adaptive statistical iterative and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques. Radiology 2010; 257:373-383
6. Cornfeld D, Israel G, Detroy E, Bokhari J, Mojibian H. Impact of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR) on radiation dose and image quality in aortic dissection studies: a qualitative and quantitative analysis. AJR 2011; 196:713; [web]W336-W340
7. Yanagawa M, Honda O, Yoshida S, et al. Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique for pulmonary CT: image quality of the cadaveric lung on standard-and reduced-dose CT. Acad Radiol 2010; 17:1259-1266
8. Sagara Y, Hara AK, Pavlicek W, et al. Comparison of low-dose CT with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and routine-dose CT with filtered back projection in 53 patients. AJR 2010; 195:713-719
9. Marin D, Nelson RC, Schindera ST, et al. Lowtube-voltage, high-tube-current multidetector abdominal CT: improved image quality and decreased radiation dose with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm -initial clinical experience. Radiology 2010; 254:145-153
10. Pontana F, Duhamel A, Pagniez J, et al. Chest computed tomography using iterative reconstruction vs filtered back projection. Part 2. Image quality of low-dose CT examinations in 80 patients. Eur Radiol 2011; 21:636-643
11. Pontana F, Pagniez J, Flohr T, et al. Chest computed tomography using iterative reconstruction vs filtered back projection. Part 1. Evaluation of image noise reduction in 32 patients. Eur Radiol 2011; 21:627-635
12. Shrimpton PC, Hillier MC, Lewis M, Dunn M. NRPB report W67: doses from computed tomography (CT) examinations in the UK -2003 review. London, UK: National Radiological Protection Board, 2005
13. Larke FJ, Kruger RL, Cagnon CH, et al. Estimated radiation dose associated with low-dose chest CT of average-size participants in the National Lung Screening Trial. AJR 2011; 197:1165-1169
14. Christner JA, Kofler JM, McCollough CH. Estimating effective dose for CT using dose-length product compared with using organ doses: consequences of adopting International Commission on Radiological Protection Publication 103 or dualenergy scanning. AJR 2010; 194:881-889
15. Miéville FA, Gudinchet F, Brunelle F, Bochud FO, Verdun FR. Iterative reconstruction methods in two different MDCT scanners: physical metrics and 4-alternative forced-choice detectability experiments -a phantom approach. Phys Med 2012 Jan 2 [Epub ahead of print]
16. Leonardi M, Bongartz G, Geleijns DJ, et al. European guidelines on quality criteria for computed tomography. European Commission website. w3.tue. nl/fileadmin/sbd/Documenten/Leergang/BSM/European-Guidelines-Quality-Criteria- Computed-Tomography-Eur-16252.pdf. Published 1999. Accessed October 23, 2012
17. Menezes RJ, Roberts HC, Paul NS, et al. Lung cancer screening using low-dose computed tomography in at-risk individuals: the Toronto experience. Lung Cancer 2010; 67:177-183
18. Kramer BS, Berg CD, Aberle DR, Prorok PC. Lung cancer screening with low-dose helical CT: results from the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST). J Med Screen 2011; 18:109-111
19. Bowman RV, Crossin J, Courtney D, et al. The Queensland Lung Cancer Screening Study: rationale, design and methods. Intern Med J 2012 Apr 4 [Epub ahead of print]
20. Aberle DR, Berg CD, Black WC, et al.; National Lung Screening Trial Research Team. The National Lung Screening Trial: overview and study design. Radiology 2011; 258:243-253