Embodied engagement: Supporting movement awareness in ubiquitous computing systems

Ubiquitous Learning

Volumn 3, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 97-111

  Levisohn, Aaron ^a   Schiphorst, Thecla ^a  

^a SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Awareness; Design; Embodiment; Engagement; Experience; Movement; Phenomenology; Somatics; Ubiquitous computing

Indexed keywords

EID: 84876009526     PISSN: 18359795     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.18848/1835-9795/cgp/v03i04/40309     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Ackerman, J. M., Nocera, C. C., & Bargh, J. A. (2010). Incidental Haptic Sensations Influence Social Judgments and Decisions. Science, 328 (5986), 1712-1715. doi:10.1126/science.1189993
2. Alexander, F. M. (1932). The Use of the Self: Its Conscious Direction in Relation to Diagnosis, Functioning and the Control of Reaction. New York: E.P. Dutton.
3. Antle, A. N., Corness, G., & Droumeva, M. (2009). What the body knows: Exploring the benefits of embodied metaphors in hybrid physical digital environments. Interacting with Computers, 21 (1-2), 66-75. DOI: 10.1016/j.intcom.2008.10.005
4. Antle, A. N., Droumeva, M., & Corness, G. (2008). Playing with the sound maker: Do embodied metaphors help children learn? In proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (pp. 178-185). Chicago, Illinois: ACM.
5. Asokan, A., & Cagan, J. (2005). Defining cultural identities using grammars: An exploration of "cultural languages" to create meaningful experiences. In proceedings of the 2005 Conference on Designing for User Experience (pp. 35-46). San Francisco, California: American Institute of Graphic Arts.
6. Bacigalupi, M. (1998). The craft of movement in interaction design. In proceedings of the Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces (pp. 174-184).
7. Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(04), 577-660.
8. Craig, A. D. (2004). Human feelings: why are some more aware than others? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8 (6), 239-241. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.04.004
9. Damasio, A. R. (1995). Descartes ' Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. New York: Avon Books.
10. Djajadiningrat, T., Matthews, B., & Stienstra, M. (2007). Easy doesn't do it: Skill and expression in tangible aesthetics. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 11 (8), 657-676. doi:10.1007/s00779-006-0137-9
11. Feldenkrais, M. (1981). The Elusive Obvious or Basic Feldenkrais. Capitola, CA: Meta Publications.
12. Fitts, P. M. (1954). The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47 (6), 381-391.
13. Gindler, E. (1995). Gymnastik for people whose lives are full of activity. In D. H. Johnson (Ed.), Bone, Breath, and Gesture: Practices of Embodiment, Volume 1 (pp. 5-14). Berkeley, California: North Atlantic Books.
14. Hanna, T. (1995). What is somatics? In D. H. Johnson (Ed.), Bone, Breath, and Gesture: Practices of Embodiment Volume 1 (pp. 341-352). Berkeley, California: North Atlantic Books.
15. Hummels, Overbeeke, & Klooster. (2007). Move to get moved: a search for methods, tools and knowledge to design for expressive and rich movement-based interaction. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 11 (8), 677-690. doi:10.1007/s00779-006-0135-y
16. Hurtienne, J., & Israel, J. H. (2007). Image schemas and their metaphorical extensions: Intuitive patterns for tangible interaction. In proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction (pp. 127-134). Baton Rouge, Louisiana: ACM. doi:10.1145/1226969.1226996
17. Jacob, R. J., Girouard, A., Hirshfield, L. M., Horn, M. S., Shaer, O., Solovey, E. T., & Zigelbaum, J. (2008). Reality-based interaction: A framework for post-WIMP interfaces. In proceeding of the Twenty-Sixth Annual SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 201-210). Florence, Italy: ACM. doi:10.1145/1357054.1357089
18. Jensen, M. V., Buur, J., & Djajadiningrat, T. (2005). Designing the user actions in tangible interaction. In proceedings of the 4th Decennial Conference on Critical Computing: Between Sense and Sensibility (pp. 9-18). Aarhus, Denmark: ACM.
19. Johnson, M. (2007). The Meaning of the Body: Aesthetics of Human Understanding. Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press.
20. Kjölberg, J. (2004). Designing full body movement interaction using modern dance as a starting point. In proceedings of the 5th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques (pp. 353-356). Cambridge, MA: ACM.
21. Klooster, S., & Overbeeke, C. J. (2005). Designing products as an integral part of choreography of interaction: The product's form as an integral part of movement. In Proceedings of the 1st European Workshop on Design and Semantics of Form and Movement (DeSForM) (pp. 23-35). Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
22. Laban, R. (1976). Modern Educational Dance. London: Macdonald & Evans.
23. Larssen, A.T., Robertson, T., Loke, L., & Edwards J. (2007). Introduction to the special issue on movement-based interaction. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 11 (8), 607-608. doi:10.1007/s00779-006-0131-2
24. Larssen, A. T., Robertson, T., & Edwards, J. (2007). Experiential bodily knowing as a design (sens)-ability in interaction design. In proceedings of the 3rd European Conference on Design & Semantics of Form & Movement (DeSForM) (pp. 117-132). Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
25. Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in Practice. Cambridge University Press.
26. Loke, L., & Robertson, T. (2007). Making strange with the falling body in interactive technology design. Design and Semantics of Form and Movement (DeSForM 2007), (pp. 164-175). Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
27. Loke, L., Larssen, A. T., & Robertson, T. (2005). Labanotation for design of movement-based interaction. In proceedings of the Second Australasian Conference on Interactive Entertainment (pp. 113-120). Sydney, Australia: Creativity & Cognition Studios Press.
28. Moen, J. (2005). Towards people based movement interaction and kinaesthetic interaction experiences. In proceedings of the 4th Decennial Conference on Critical Computing: Between Sense and Sensibility. New York, NY: ACM Press.
29. Moen, J. (2007). From hand-held to body-worn: Embodied experiences of the design and use of a wearable movement-based interaction concept. In proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction (pp. 251-258). Baton Rouge, Louisiana: ACM.
30. Nardi, B. A. (1995). Context and consciousness: Activity Theory and Human-Computer Interaction. New York, NY: The MIT Press.
31. Pallotta, V. (2009). Kinetic user interfaces for unobtrusive interaction with mobile and ubiquitous systems. International Journal of Ubiquitous Computing, 1 (1), 87-99.
32. Petersen, M. G., Iversen, O. S., Krogh, P. G., & Ludvigsen, M. (2004). Aesthetic interaction: A pragmatist's aesthetics of interactive systems. In proceedings of the 5th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques (pp. 269-276). Cambridge, MA, USA: ACM.
33. Rizzolatti, G., & Craighero, L. (2004). The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27 (1), 169-192.
34. Schiphorst, T., & Andersen, K. (2004). Between bodies: Using experience modeling to create gestural protocols for physiological data transfer. In proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing, Fringe. ACM.
35. Schiphorst, T. (2009, September). The Varieties of User Experience: Bridging Embodied Methodologies from Somatics and Performance to Human Computer Interaction (PhD Dissertation). Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
36. Schiphorst, T. (2011). Self-evidence: Applying somatic connoisseurship to experience design. In extended abstracts of the Conferenc e on Human Factors in Computing. ACM (In Press).
37. Sheets-Johnstone, M. (1999). The Primacy of Movement. John Benjamins Publishing Co: Philadelphia, PA.
38. Weiser, M., Gold, R., & Brown, J. S. (1999). The origins of ubiquitous computing research at PARC in the late 1980s. IBM Systems Journal, 38 (4), 693-696.
39. Williams, L. E., & Bargh, J. A. (2008). Experiencing physical warmth promotes interpersonal warmth. Science, 322 (5901), 606-607. doi:10.1126/science.1162548