Outlier Responses Reflect Sensitivity to Statistical Structure in the Human Brain

PLoS Computational Biology

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2013, Pages

  Garrido, Marta I ^a,b   Sahani, Maneesh ^c   Dolan, Raymond J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENCODING (SYMBOLS); STATISTICS; STOCHASTIC SYSTEMS;

DECISIONS MAKINGS; HUMAN BRAIN; KEEP TRACK OF; LEARN+; MISMATCH NEGATIVITY; ODDBALL PARADIGMS; PURE TONES; STATISTICAL STRUCTURES; STOCHASTIC REGULARITY; UNCERTAINTY;

DECISION MAKING;

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY FEEDBACK; AUDITORY STIMULATION; BRAIN REGION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LOCAL ADAPTATION; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MISMATCH NEGATIVITY; NEUROANATOMY; NORMAL DISTRIBUTION; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SOUND DETECTION; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS;

EID: 84875990299     PISSN: 1553734X     EISSN: 15537358     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002999     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Mumford D, (1991) On the computational architecture of the neocortex. I. The role of the thalamo-cortical loop. Biol Cybern 65: 135-145.
2. Mumford D, (1992) On the computational architecture of the neocortex. II. The role of cortico-cortical loops. Biol Cybern 66: 241-251.
3. Rao RP, Ballard DH, (1999) Predictive coding in the visual cortex: a functional interpretation of some extra-classical receptive-field effects. Nat Neurosci 2: 79-87.
4. Yuille A, Kersten D, (2006) Vision as Bayesian inference: analysis by synthesis? Trends Cogn Sci 10: 301-308.
5. Friston K, (2005) A theory of cortical responses. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 360: 815-836.
6. Yu AJ, Dayan P, (2005) Uncertainty, neuromodulation, and attention. Neuron 46: 681-692.
7. Naatanen R, Lehtokoski A, Lennes M, Cheour M, Huotilainen M, et al. (1997) Language-specific phoneme representations revealed by electric and magnetic brain responses. Nature 385: 432-434.
8. Naatanen R (1992) Attention and brain function. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9. Doeller CF, Opitz B, Mecklinger A, Krick C, Reith W, et al. (2003) Prefrontal cortex involvement in preattentive auditory deviance detection: neuroimaging and electrophysiological evidence. Neuroimage 20: 1270-1282.
10. Baldeweg T, Klugman A, Gruzelier J, Hirsch SR, (2004) Mismatch negativity potentials and cognitive impairment in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 69: 203-217.
11. Garrido MI, Friston KJ, Kiebel SJ, Stephan KE, Baldeweg T, et al. (2008) The functional anatomy of the MMN: a DCM study of the roving paradigm. Neuroimage 42: 936-944.
12. Boly M, Garrido MI, Gosseries O, Bruno MA, Boveroux P, et al. (2011) Preserved feedforward but impaired top-down processes in the vegetative state. Science 332: 858-862.
13. Schroger E, Wolff C, (1998) Behavioral and electrophysiological effects of task-irrelevant sound change: a new distraction paradigm. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 7: 71-87.
14. Garrido MI, Dolan RJ, Sahani M, (2011) Surprise leads to noisier perceptual decisions. i-Perception 2: 112-120.
15. Paavilainen P, Simola J, Jaramillo M, Naatanen R, Winkler I, (2001) Preattentive extraction of abstract feature conjunctions from auditory stimulation as reflected by the mismatch negativity (MMN). Psychophysiology 38: 359-365.
16. Tervaniemi M, Maury S, Naatanen R, (1994) Neural representations of abstract stimulus features in the human brain as reflected by the mismatch negativity. Neuroreport 5: 844-846.
17. Vuust P, Pallesen KJ, Bailey C, van Zuijen TL, Gjedde A, et al. (2005) To musicians, the message is in the meter pre-attentive neuronal responses to incongruent rhythm are left-lateralized in musicians. Neuroimage 24: 560-564.
18. Strange BA, Duggins A, Penny W, Dolan RJ, Friston KJ, (2005) Information theory, novelty and hippocampal responses: unpredicted or unpredictable? Neural Netw 18: 225-230.
19. Kiebel SJ, von Kriegstein K, Daunizeau J, Friston KJ, (2009) Recognizing sequences of sequences. PLoS Comput Biol 5: e1000464.
20. Winkler I, Paavilainen P, Alho K, Reinikainen K, Sams M, et al. (1990) The effect of small variation of the frequent auditory stimulus on the event-related brain potential to the infrequent stimulus. Psychophysiology 27: 228-235.
21. Cheng CH, Hsu WY, Shih YH, Lin HC, Liao KK, et al. (2010) Differential cerebral reactivity to shortest and longer tones: neuromagnetic and behavioral evidence. Hear Res 268: 260-270.
22. Daikhin L, Ahissar M, (2012) Responses to deviants are modulated by subthreshold variability of the standard. Psychophysiology 49: 31-42.
23. Vroomen J, de Gelder B, (2000) Sound enhances visual perception: cross-modal effects of auditory organization on vision. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 26: 1583-1590.
24. Litvak V, Friston K, (2008) Electromagnetic source reconstruction for group studies. Neuroimage 42: 1490-1498.
25. Friston K, Harrison L, Daunizeau J, Kiebel S, Phillips C, et al. (2008) Multiple sparse priors for the M/EEG inverse problem. Neuroimage 39: 1104-1120.
26. Maldjian JA, Laurienti PJ, Kraft RA, Burdette JH, (2003) An automated method for neuroanatomic and cytoarchitectonic atlas-based interrogation of fMRI data sets. Neuroimage 19: 1233-1239.
27. Opitz B, Rinne T, Mecklinger A, von Cramon DY, Schroger E, (2002) Differential contribution of frontal and temporal cortices to auditory change detection: fMRI and ERP results. Neuroimage 15: 167-174.
28. Teki S, Chait M, Kumar S, von Kriegstein K, Griffiths TD, (2011) Brain bases for auditory stimulus-driven figure-ground segregation. J Neurosci 31: 164-171.
29. Furl N, Kumar S, Alter K, Durrant S, Shawe-Taylor J, et al. (2011) Neural prediction of higher-order auditory sequence statistics. Neuroimage 54: 2267-2277.
30. Molholm S, Martinez A, Ritter W, Javitt DC, Foxe JJ, (2005) The neural circuitry of pre-attentive auditory change-detection: an fMRI study of pitch and duration mismatch negativity generators. Cereb Cortex 15: 545-551.
31. Taaseh N, Yaron A, Nelken I, (2011) Stimulus-specific adaptation and deviance detection in the rat auditory cortex. PLoS One 6: e23369.
32. Farley BJ, Quirk MC, Doherty JJ, Christian EP, (2010) Stimulus-specific adaptation in auditory cortex is an NMDA-independent process distinct from the sensory novelty encoded by the mismatch negativity. J Neurosci 30: 16475-16484.
33. Jaaskelainen IP, Ahveninen J, Bonmassar G, Dale AM, Ilmoniemi RJ, et al. (2004) Human posterior auditory cortex gates novel sounds to consciousness. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101: 6809-6814.
34. May P, Tiitinen H, Ilmoniemi RJ, Nyman G, Taylor JG, et al. (1999) Frequency change detection in human auditory cortex. J Comput Neurosci 6: 99-120.
35. Naatanen R, Jacobsen T, Winkler I, (2005) Memory-based or afferent processes in mismatch negativity (MMN): a review of the evidence. Psychophysiology 42: 25-32.
36. Garrido MI, Kilner JM, Stephan KE, Friston KJ, (2009) The mismatch negativity: a review of underlying mechanisms. Clin Neurophysiol 120: 453-463.
37. Ruhnau P, Herrmann B, Schroger E, (2012) Finding the right control: the mismatch negativity under investigation. Clin Neurophysiol 123: 507-512.
38. Ulanovsky N, Las L, Farkas D, Nelken I, (2004) Multiple time scales of adaptation in auditory cortex neurons. J Neurosci 24: 10440-10453.
39. Moore BCJ, editor(2004) An Introduction to the Psychology of Hearing. 5th edition. Amsterdam, London: Academic Press.
40. de Cheveigne A, Simon JZ, (2008) Denoising based on spatial filtering. J Neurosci Methods 171: 331-339.
41. Ngo MK, Spence C, (2010) Crossmodal facilitation of masked visual target identification. Atten Percept Psychophys 72: 1938-1947.
42. Meredith MA, Nemitz JW, Stein BE, (1987) Determinants of multisensory integration in superior colliculus neurons. I. Temporal factors. J Neurosci 7: 3215-3229.
43. Overath T, Cusack R, Kumar S, von Kriegstein K, Warren JD, et al. (2007) An information theoretic characterisation of auditory encoding. PLoS Biol 5: e288.
44. Corbetta M, Shulman GL, (2002) Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nat Rev Neurosci 3: 201-215.
45. Ulanovsky N, Las L, Nelken I, (2003) Processing of low-probability sounds by cortical neurons. Nat Neurosci 6: 391-398.
46. van Zuijen TL, Simoens VL, Paavilainen P, Naatanen R, Tervaniemi M, (2006) Implicit, intuitive, and explicit knowledge of abstract regularities in a sound sequence: an event-related brain potential study. J Cogn Neurosci 18: 1292-1303.
47. Dayan P, Hinton GE, Neal RM, Zemel RS, (1995) The Helmholtz machine. Neural Comput 7: 889-904.
48. Kilner JM, Kiebel SJ, Friston KJ, (2005) Applications of random field theory to electrophysiology. Neurosci Lett 374: 174-178.