Finding the right control: The mismatch negativity under investigation

Clinical Neurophysiology

Volumn 123, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 507-512

  Ruhnau, Philipp ^a   Herrmann, Björn ^b   Schröger, Erich ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cascadic control design; Mismatch negativity; N1; Oddball; Refractoriness

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY SYSTEM FUNCTION; BRAIN DEPTH STIMULATION; BRAIN NERVE CELL; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MISMATCH NEGATIVITY; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; REACTION TIME; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84856224811     PISSN: 13882457     EISSN: 18728952     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2011.07.035     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Alain C., Woods D.L. Signal clustering modulates auditory cortical activity in humans. Percept Psychophys 1994, 56:501-516.
2. Alain C., Woods D.L., Knight R.T. A distributed cortical network for auditory sensory memory in humans. Brain Res 1998, 812:23-37.
3. Astikainen P., Lillstrang E., Ruusuvirta T. Visual mismatch negativity for changes in orientation - a sensory memory-dependent response. Eur J Neurosci 2008, 28:2319-2324.
4. Bakeman R. Recommended effect size statistics for repeated measures designs. Behav Res Methods 2005, 37:379-384.
5. Benjamini Y., Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Statist Soc Ser B 1995, 57:289-300.
6. Budd T.W., Michie P.T. Facilitation of the N1 peak of the auditory ERP at short stimulus intervals. Neuroreport 1994, 5:2513-2516.
7. Cheng C.H., Hsu W.Y., Shih Y.H., Lin H.C., Liao K.K., Wu Z.A., et al. Differential cerebral reactivity to shortest and longer tones: neuromagnetic and behavioral evidence. Hear Res 2010, 268:260-270.
8. Escera C., Corral M.J. Role of mismatch negativity and novelty-P3 in involuntary auditory attention. J Psychophysiol 2007, 21:251-264.
9. Genovese C.R., Lazar N.A., Nichols T. Thresholding of statistical maps in functional neuroimaging using the false discovery rate. Neuroimage 2002, 15:870-878.
10. Greenhouse S.W., Geisser S. On methods in the analysis of profile data. Psychometrika 1959, 24:95-112.
11. Grimm S., Escera C., Slabu L., Costa-Faidella J. Electrophysiological evidence for the hierarchical organization of auditory change detection in the human brain. Psychophysiology 2011, 48:377-384.
12. Horváth J., Czigler I., Jacobsen T., Maess B., Schröger E., Winkler I. MMN or no MMN: no magnitude of deviance effect on the MMN amplitude. Psychophysiology 2008, 45:60-69.
13. Horváth J., Winkler I., Bendixen A. Do N1/MMN, P3a, and RON form a strongly coupled chain reflecting the three stages of auditory distraction?. Biol Psychol 2008, 79:139-147.
14. Horváth J., Winkler I. How the human auditory system treats repetition amongst change. Neurosci Lett 2004, 368:157-161.
15. Hsu W.Y., Cheng C.H., Lin H.C., Liao K.K., Wu Z.A., Ho L.T., et al. Memory-based mismatch response to changes in duration of auditory stimuli: an MEG study. Clin Neurophysiol 2010, 121:1744-1750.
16. Jääskeläinen I.P., Ahveninen J., Bonmassar G., Dale A.M., Ilmoniemi R.J., Levänen S., et al. Human posterior auditory cortex gates novel sounds to consciousness. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004, 101:6809-6814.
17. Jacobsen T., Schröger E. Is there pre-attentive memory-based comparison of pitch?. Psychophysiology 2001, 38:723-727.
18. Jacobsen T., Schröger E., Horenkamp T., Winkler I. Mismatch negativity to pitch change: varied stimulus proportions in controlling effects of neural refractoriness on human auditory event-related brain potentials. Neurosci Lett 2003, 344:79-82.
19. Kimura M., Katayama J., Ohira H., Schröger E. Visual mismatch negativity: new evidence from the equiprobable paradigm. Psychophysiology 2009, 46:402-409.
20. Laufer I., Negishi M., Constable R.T. Comparator and non-comparator mechanisms of change detection in the context of speech - an ERP study. Neuroimage 2009, 44:546-562.
21. Maess B., Jacobsen T., Schröger E., Friederici A.D. Localizing pre-attentive auditory memory-based comparison: magnetic mismatch negativity to pitch change. Neuroimage 2007, 37:561-571.
22. May P.J.C., Tiitinen H. Mismatch negativity (MMN), the deviance-elicited auditory deflection, explained. Psychophysiology 2010, 47:66-122.
23. Näätänen R. The mismatch negativity: a powerful tool for cognitive neuroscience. Ear Hear 1995, 16:6-18.
24. Näätänen R., Alho K. Higher-order processes in auditory-change detection. Trends Cogn Sci 1997, 1:44-45.
25. Näätänen R., Gaillard A.W.K., Mäntysalo S. Early selective-attention effect on evoked potential reinterpreted. Acta Psychol 1978, 42:313-329.
26. Näätänen R., Jacobsen T., Winkler I. Memory-based or afferent processes in mismatch negativity (MMN): a review of the evidence. Psychophysiology 2005, 42:25-32.
27. Näätänen R., Paavilainen P., Alho K., Reinikainen K., Sams M. Do event-related potentials reveal the mechanism of the auditory sensory memory in the human brain?. Neurosci Lett 1989, 98:217-221.
28. Näätänen R., Winkler I. The concept of auditory stimulus representation in cognitive neuroscience. Psychol Bull 1999, 125:826-859.
29. Opitz B., Schröger E., Von Cramon D.Y. Sensory and cognitive mechanisms for preattentive change detection in auditory cortex. Eur J Neurosci 2005, 21:531-535.
30. Pazo-Alvarez P., Amenedo E., Cadaveira F. Automatic detection of motion direction in the human brain. Eur J Neurosci 2004, 19:1978-1986.
31. Schröger E. Higher-order processes in auditory-change detection response from Schröger. Trends Cogn Sci 1997, 1:45-46.
32. Schröger E. Mismatch negativity: a microphone into auditory memory. J Psychophysiol 2007, 21:138-146.
33. Schröger E., Winkler I. Presentation rate and magnitude of stimulus deviance effects on human pre-attentive change detection. Neurosci Lett 1995, 193:185-188.
34. Schröger E., Wolff C. Mismatch response of the human brain to changes in sound location. Neuroreport 1996, 7:3005-3008.
35. Schröger E., Wolff C. Behavioral and electrophysiological effects of task-irrelevant sound change: a new distraction paradigm. Cogn Brain Res 1998, 7:71-87.
36. Sussman E., Ĉeponiene R., Shestakova A., Näätänen R., Winkler I. Auditory stream segregation processes operate similarly in school-aged children and adults. Hear Res 2001, 153:108-114.
37. Tervaniemi M., Kujala T., Alho K., Virtanen J., Ilmoniemi R.J., Näätänen R. Functional specialization of the human auditory cortex in processing phonetic and musical sounds: a magnetoencephalographic (MEG) study. Neuroimage 1999, 9:330-336.
38. Urbach T.P., Kutas M. Interpreting event-related brain potential (ERP) distributions: implications of baseline potentials and variability with application to amplitude normalization by vector scaling. Biol Psychol 2006, 72:333-343.
39. Winkler I., Denham S.L., Nelken I. Modeling the auditory scene: predictive regularity representations and perceptual objects. Trends Cogn Sci 2009, 13:532-540.
40. Wolff C., Schröger E. Activation of the auditory pre-attentive change detection system by tone repetitions with fast stimulation rate. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 2001, 10:323-327.