Defining competence in EU external relations: Lessons from the treaty reform process

Law and Practice of EU External Relations: Salient Features of a Changing Landscape

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 34-69

  Cremona, Marise ^a  

^a EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84875964006     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511494925.003     Document Type: Chapter

References (30)

1. M. Cremona, ‘The Union’s External Action: Constitutional Perspectives’, in G. Amato, H. Bribosia and B. de Witte (eds.), Genèse et Destiné de la Constitution Européenne(Bruxelles, Bruylant, 2007) p. 1173.
2. B. de Witte, ‘Simplification and Reorganization of the European Treaties’, 39 CMLRev. (2002), p. 1255.
3. M. Cremona, ‘The Draft Constitutional Treaty: External Relations and External Action’, 40 CMLRev. (2003), p. 1347.
4. A. Dashwood, ‘The EU Constitution:What Will Really Change?’, 7 Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies (2005), p. 33.
5. B. de Witte, ‘The Constitutional Law of External Relations’, in I. Pernice and M. Poiares Maduro (eds.), A Constitution for the European Union: First Comments on the 2003 Draft of the European Convention(Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2004).
6. S. Griller, ‘External Relations’, in B. de Witte (ed.), Ten Reflections on the Constitutional Treaty for Europe(Florence: European University Institute, Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies and Academy of European Law, 2003).
7. M. Cremona, ‘A Constitutional Basis for Effective External Action? An Assessment of the Provisions on EU External Action in the Constitutional Treaty’, EUI Working Paper, LAW 2006/30.
8. P. Craig, ‘Competence: Clarity, Conferral, Containment and Consideration’, 29 ELRev. (2004), p. 323.
9. R. A. Wessel, ‘The International Legal Status of the EU’, 2 EFARev. (1997), p. 109.
10. R.A. Wessel, ‘Revisiting the International Legal Status of the EU’, 5 EFARev. (2000), p. 507.
11. N. Neuwahl, ‘A Partner with a Troubled Personality: EU Treaty-Making in Matters of CFSP and JHA after Amsterdam’, 3 EFARev. (1998), p. 177.
12. R. Gosalbo Bono, ‘Some Reflections on the CFSP Legal Order’, 43 CMLRev. (2006), pp. 354–7.
13. M. Garbagnati Ketvel, ‘The Jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice in Respect of the Common Foreign and Security Policy’, 55 ICLQ (2006), pp. 84–91.
14. A. Dashwood and J. Heliskoski, ‘The Classic Authorities Revisited’, in A. Dashwood and C. Hillion (eds.), The General Law of EC External Relations(London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2000).
15. A. Hable, ‘The European Constitution: Changes in the Reform of Competences with a Particular Focus on the External Dimension’, Europa-Institut Wirtschaftsuniversität Wien Working Paper No. 67, 2005.
16. S. Griller, ‘External Action: Towards More Efficiency, Coherence and Clarity?’, lecture at University of London, 10 February 2005.
17. M. Cremona, ‘The External Dimension of the Single Market: Building (on) the Foundations’ in C. Barnard and J. Scott (eds.), The Law of the Single European Market: Unpacking the Premises(Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2002).
18. M. Cremona, ‘A Policy of Bits and Pieces? The Common Commercial Policy After Nice’, 4 Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies(2001), p. 61.
19. H. G. Krenzler and C. Pitschas, ‘Progress or Stagnation? The Common Commercial Policy after Nice’, 6 EFARev. (2001), p. 291.
20. C. Herrmann, ‘Common Commercial Policy after Nice: Sisyphus would have done a better job’, 39 CMLRev. (2002), p. 7.
21. R. Schütze, ‘Dual Federalism constitutionalised: the emergence of exclusive competences in the EC legal order’, 32 ELRev. (2007), p. 3.
22. A. Dashwood, ‘The Relationship between the Member States and the European Union/European Community’, 41 CMLRev. (2004), pp. 372–3.
23. A. Rosas, ‘The European Union and Mixed Agreements’, in A. Dashwood and C. Hillion (eds.), The General Law of EC External Relations(London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2000).
24. J. Heliskoski, Mixed Agreements as a Technique for Organizing the International Relations of the European Community and its Member States(The Hague: Kluwer, 2001).
25. P. Eeckhout, General Rapporteur, and M. Cremona, Community Rapporteur: in External Relations of the EU and the Member States: Competence, Mixed Agreements, International Responsibility and the Effects of International Law, Proceedings of the 22nd FIDE Congress, 2006.
26. A. von Bogdandy, ‘The legal case for unity: The European Union as a single organization with a single legal system’, 36 CMLRev. (1999), pp. 894–5.
27. R. A. Wessel, ‘The Inside Looking Out: Consistency and Delimitation in EU External Relations’, 37 CMLRev. (2000), pp. 1138–45.
28. E. Denza, The Intergovernmental Pillars of the European Union(Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002), p. 20.
29. U. Di Fabbio ‘Some Remarks on the Allocation of Competences Between the EU and its Member States’, 39 CMLRev. (2002), p. 1296.
30. N. Walker, ‘After finalité? The Future of the European Constitutional Idea’, in G. Amato, H. Bribosia and B. de Witte (eds.), Genése et Destineé de la Constitution européenne (Brussels: Bruylant, 2007).