A partner with a troubled personality: EU treaty-making in matters of CFSP and JHA after Amsterdam

European Foreign Affairs Review

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 177-195

  Neuwahl, Nanette A E M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84937257677     PISSN: 13846299     EISSN: 18758223     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.54648/eerr1998011     Document Type: Review

References (13)

1. For example, Euratom has acceded instead of the Union to the Organization for the Development of Energy in the Korean Peninsula, although there had been a previous joint action under the CFSP and although Euratom is not really competent for matters of non-proliferation. R. Pandraud, Revision des traites europeens, Avant Amsterdam: treize mois de Conference intergouvernementale. Presentation generate. Les Documents d'information Assemblee nationale (DIAN), Delegation pour L'Union Europeenne, Raport d'information No. 3509, Tome I, at 48. For the conclusion of the Memorandum of Understanding on the European Administration of Mostar, the Member States gave the Presidency of the Council the power to sign on their behalf.
2. See also R. A. Wessel, 'The international legal status of the European Union' 2 EFA Rev. (1997) 109-129, at 129.
3. E. Paasivirta, 'The European Union: from an aggregate of states to a legal person?' 2 Hofstra Law and Policy Forum (1997) 100-122.
4. J.-V. Louis and P. Brueckner, Le Droit de la Communaute europeenne. Vol. 12, Relations exterieures (Editions de l'Universite de Bruxelles, Brussels 1980), 2.
5. D. McGoldrick, International Relations Law of the European Union (Longman, London 1997), 38.
6. J. A. Frowein, 'Die Europaische Union mit WEU als Sicherheitssystem' in O. Due, M. Lutter and J. Schwarze (eds), Festschrift für Ulrich Everling (Baden Baden 1995), 315-326, at 321.
7. As we saw, this view is supported by the Reparations for Injuries case, note 5 above and accompanying text.
8. Comment by the Irish Presidency on the Dublin draft, also available on the following page of the world wide web: http://www.irlgov. ie/iveagh/eu/state/treaty-rev/chapterl3.html.
9. On the question of competence see in particular A. Rosas, 'Mixed union - mixed agreements' in M. Koskenniemi (ed.), International Law Aspects of the European Union (Kluwer, Deventer 1997).
10. E. Regelsberger and M. Jopp. 'Gemeinsame Aussen- und Sicherheitspolitik' 4 Integration (1997) 255-263 at 257.
11. S. Nuttall, 'The CFSP provisions of the Amsterdam Treaty: an exercise in collusive ambiguity' 3 CFSP Forum (1997).
12. For the current role of courts in JHA, see N. Neuwahl, 'Judicial control in matters of justice and home affairs: what role for the Court of Justice?' in R. Bieber, and J. Monar (eds), Justice and Home Affairs in the European Union: The Development of the Third Pillar (European Interuniversity Press, Brussels 1995), 301-320.
13. See Art. J. 18 [28 new] TEU. See also J. Monar, 'The financial dimension of the common foreign and security policy' in M. Holland (ed.), Joint Actions (Macmillan, London 1996).