Communication apprehension: Issues to consider in the classroom

Classroom Communication and Instructional Processes: Advances Through Meta-Analysis

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 211-227

  Bourhis, John ^a   Allen, Mike ^b   Bauman, Isabelle ^a  

^a MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84875957948     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203933145     Document Type: Chapter

References (59)

1. Allen, M. (1989). A comparison of self-report, observer, and physiological assessments of public speaking anxiety reduction techniques using meta-analysis. Communication Studies, 40, 127-139.
2. Allen, M., & Bourhis, J. (1996). The relationship of communication apprehension to communication behavior:Ameta-analysis. Communication Quarterly, 44, 214-226.
3. Allen, M., Bourhis, J., Emmers-Sommer, T., & Sahlstein, E. (1998). Reducing dating anxiety: A meta-analysis. Communication Reports, 11, 49-55.
4. Allen, M., D'Alessio, D., & Emmers-Sommer, T. (1999). Reactions of criminal sexual offenders to pornography: A meta-analytic summary. In M. Roloff (Ed.), Communication yearbook 22 (pp. 139-169). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5. Allen, M., Hecht, M., & Martin, J. (1996). Examining the impact of culture social scientifically:Some suggestions from examining Martin, Hecht, and Larkey. World Communication, 25, 69-78.
6. Allen, M., & Hunt, S. (1993). Legal issues in the treatment of communication apprehension. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 21, 385-390.
7. Allen, M., Hunter, J., & Donohue, W. (1989). Meta-analysis of self-report data on the effectiveness of public speaking anxiety treatment techniques. Communication Education, 38, 54-76.
8. Ayres, J., Ayres, D., & Sharp, D. (1993). A progress report on the development of an instrument to measure communication apprehension in employment interviews. Communication Research Reports, 10, 87-92.
9. Ayres, J., Heuett, B., & Sonandré, D. (1998). Testing a refinement in an intervention for communication apprehension. Communication Reports, 11, 73-86.
10. Ayres, J., & Hopf, T. (1989). Visualization: Is it more than extra attention? Communication Education, 38, 1-5.
11. Ayres, J., & Hopf, T. (1990). The long-term effect of visualization in the classroom: A brief research report. Communication Education, 39, 75-87.
12. Ayres, J., & Hopf, T. (1991). Visualization: The next generation. Communication Research Reports, 8, 133-140.
13. Ayres, J., & Hopf, T. (1992). Visualization: Reducing speech anxiety and enhancing performance. Communication Reports, 5, 1-10.
14. Ayres, J., & Hopf, T. (1993). Coping with speech anxiety. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
15. Ayres, J., Schliesman, T., & Sonandré, D. (1998). Practice makes perfect but does it help reduce communication apprehension? CommunicationResearchReports, 15, 170-179.
16. Beatty, M. (1984). Physiological assessment. In J. Daly & J. McCroskey (Eds.), Avoiding communication: Shyness, reticence, and communication apprehension (pp. 95-106). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
17. Beatty, M., Heisel, A., Hall, A., Levine, T., & LaFrance, B. (2002). What can we learn from the study of twins about genetic and environmental influences on interpersonal affiliation, aggressiveness, and social anxiety?: A meta-analytic study. Communication Monographs, 69, 1-18.
18. Beatty, M., McCroskey, J., & Heisel, A. (1998). Communication apprehension as temperamental expression: A communibiological paradigm. Communication Monographs, 65, 197-219.
19. Bell, R. (1986). The multivariate structure of communication avoidance. Communication Monographs, 53, 365-375.
20. Bolls, P., & Tan, A. (1996). Communication anxiety and teacher communication competence among Native American and Caucasian students. Communication Research Reports, 13, 205-213.
21. Booth-Butterfield, S. (1989). The relationship between state and trait communication anxiety. Communication Research Reports, 6, 19-25.
22. Booth-Butterfield, S., & Cottone, R. (1991). Ethical issues in the treatment of communication apprehension. Communication Education, 40, 172-179.
23. Bourhis, J., & Allen, M. (1992). Meta-analysis of the relationship between communication apprehension and cognitive performance. Communication Education, 41, 68-76.
24. Bourhis, J., & Allen, M. (1993). The needs of the apprehensive student. In L. Hugenberg, P. Gray, & D. Trank (Eds.), Teaching and directing the basic communication course (pp. 71-76). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
25. Bourhis, J., & Allen, M. (1998). The role of videotaped feedback in the instruction of public speaking: A quantitative synthesis of published empirical literature. Communication Research Reports, 15, 256-261.
26. Bourhis, J., Tkachuk, T., & Allen, M. (1993). A comparison of and commentary on crosscultural communication apprehension research: A preliminary assessment. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Speech Communication Association, Chicago.
27. Bradford, L., Allen, M., & Beisser, K. (2000). Meta-analysis of intercultural communication competence research. World Communication, 29, 28-51.
28. Daly, J. (1978). The assessment of social-communicative anxiety via self-reports: A comparison of measures. Communication Monographs, 45, 204-218.
29. Dwyer, K. (1998). Conquer your speechfright: Learn how to overcome the nervousness of public speaking. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace.
30. Dwyer, K. (2000). The multidimensional model: Teaching students to self-manage high communication apprehension by self-selecting treatments. Communication Education, 49, 72-81.
31. Emmers-Sommer, T., & Allen, M. (1999). Variables related to sexual coercion: A path model. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 16, 659-678.
32. Emmers-Sommer, T., Allen, M., Bourhis, J., Sahlstein, E., Laskowski, K., Falato, W., et al. (2004). A meta-analysis of the relationship between social skills and sexual offenders. Communication Reports.
33. Hayes, B., & Marshall, W. (1984). Generalization of treatment effect in training public speakers. Behavioral Research Therapy, 22, 519-533.
34. Hewes, D., & Haight, L. (1980). Multiple-act criteria in the validation of communication traits. Human Communication Research, 6, 352-366.
35. Huett, B., Ayres, J., & Manvi, M. (1999). Imagery and public speaking apprehension in India. Communication Research Reports, 16, 131-137.
36. Kassing, J. (1997). Development of the intercultural willingness to communicate scale. Communication Research Reports, 14, 399-407.
37. Keaton, J., Kelly, L., & Finch, C. (2000). Effectiveness of the Penn State program in changing beliefs associated with reticence. Communication Education, 49, 134-145.
38. Kelly, L. (1984). Social skills training as a mode of treatment for social communication problems. In J. Daly & J. McCroskey (Eds.), Avoiding communication (pp. 189-208). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
39. Kelly, L., & Keaton, J. (1992). Atest of the effectiveness of the Reticence Program at the Pennsylvania State University. Communication Education, 41, 361-374.
40. Kelly, L., Phillips, G., & Keaton, J. (1995). Teaching people to speak well: Training and remediation of communication reticence. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
41. Klopf, D., & Cambra, R. (1979). Communication apprehension among college students in America, Australia, Japan, and Korea. Journal of Psychology, 102, 27-31.
42. Klopf, D., & Cambra, R. (1980). Apprehension about speaking among college students in the Philippines. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 80, 51-58.
43. Klopf, D., Ishii, S., & Cambra, R. (1979). The fear of speaking and the fear of writing among Japanese college students. Speech Education, 27, 55-59.
44. Knower, F. (1937). A study of speech attitudes and adjustments. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 23, 130-203.
45. Levine, T., & McCroskey, J. (1990). Measuring trait communication apprehension:Atest of rivalmeasurement models of the PRCA-24. Communication Monographs, 57, 62-71.
46. Martin, J., Hecht, M., & Larkey, L. (1994). Conversational improvement strategies for interethnic communication: African American and European American perspectives. Communication Monographs, 61, 236-255.
47. McCroskey, J. (1977). Oral communication apprehension: A review of recent theory and research. Human Communication Research, 4, 78-96.
48. McCroskey, J. (1982). Oral communication apprehension:Areconceptualization. In M. Burgoon (Ed.), Communication yearbook 6 (pp. 136-170). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
49. McCroskey, J. (1984). Self-report assessment. In J. Daly & J. McCroskey (Eds.), Avoiding communication (pp. 189-208). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
50. McCroskey, J., & Richmond, V. (1993). Identifying compulsive communicators: The talkaholic scale. Communication Research Reports, 10, 107-114.
51. Mulac, A., & Wiemann, J. (1984). Observer-perceived communication anxiety. In J. Daly & J. McCroskey (Eds.), Avoiding communication (pp. 107-124). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
52. Neuliep, J., & McCroskey, J. (1997). The development of intercultural and interethnic communication apprehension scales. CommunicationResearchReports, 14, 145-156.
53. O'Leary, M. (1988). Socially-based anxiety: A review of measures. In C. Tardy (Ed.), A handbook for the study of human communication: Methods and instruments for observing, measuring, and assessing communication practices (pp. 365-384). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
54. Paul, G. (1966). Insight versus desensitization in psychotherapy. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
55. Phillips, G. (1968). Reticence: Pathology of the normal speaker. Speech Monographs, 35, 39-49.
56. Phillips, G. (1977). Rhetoritherapy versus the medical model: Dealing with reticence. Communication Education, 26, 34-43.
57. Philpott, J. (1983). The relative contribution of meaning of verbal and nonverbal channels of communication: A meta-analysis. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE.
58. Richmond, V., Heisel, A., Smith, R., & McCroskey, J. (1998). The impact of communication apprehension and fear of talking with a physician and perceived medical outcomes. Communication Research, 15, 344-353.
59. Wilson, T., & Nisbett, R. (1978). The accuracy of verbal reports about the effects of stimuli on evaluations and behavior. Social Psychology, 41, 118-131.