Assessment of cup orientation in hip resurfacing: A comparison of TraumaCad and computed tomography

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Westacott, Daniel J ^a   McArthur, John ^a   King, Richard J ^a   Foguet, Pedro ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS COVENTRY AND WARWICKSHIRE NHS TRUST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Hip; Orientation; Resurfacing; Software; Version

Indexed keywords

ACETABULUM; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; EVALUATION; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATHOLOGY; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; RADIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY;

ACETABULUM; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; OBSERVER VARIATION; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOFTWARE; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 84875944194     PISSN: None     EISSN: 1749799X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1749-799X-8-8     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Hart AJ, Buddhdev P, Winship P, Faria N, Powell JJ, Skinner JA. Cup inclination angle of greater than 50 degrees increases whole blood concentrations of cobalt and chromium ions after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. Hip Int 2008, 18(3):212-219.
2. Hart AJ, Ilo K, Underwood R, Cann P, Henckel J, Lewis A, Cobb J, Skinner J. The relationship between the angle of version and rate of wear of retrieved metal-on-metal resurfacings: a prospective, CT-based study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2011, 93(3):315-320. 10.1302/0301-620X.93B3.25545, 21357951.
3. Kwon YM, Glyn-Jones S, Simpson DJ, Kamali A, McLardy-Smith P, Gill HS, Murray DW. Analysis of wear of retrieved metal-on-metal hip resurfacing implants revised due to pseudotumours. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2010, 92(3):356-361. 10.1302/0301-620X.92B3.23281, 20190305.
4. Langton DJ, Jameson SS, Joyce TJ, Webb J, Nargol AV. The effect of component size and orientation on the concentrations of metal ions after resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008, 90(9):1143-1151. 10.1302/0301-620X.90B9.20785, 18757952.
5. De Haan R, Campbell PA, Su EP, De Smet KA. Revision of metal-on-metal resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip: the influence of malpositioning of the components. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008, 90(9):1158-1163. 10.1302/0301-620X.90B9.19891, 18757954.
6. Grammatopoulos G, Pandit H, Glyn-Jones S, McLardy-Smith P, Gundle R, Whitwell D, Gill HS, Murray DW. Optimal acetabular orientation for hip resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2010, 92(8):1072-1078. 10.1302/0301-620X.92B8.24194, 20675749.
7. Desy NM, Bergeron SG, Petit A, Huk OL, Antoniou J. Surgical variables influence metal ion levels after hip resurfacing. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011, 469(6):1635-1641. 10.1007/s11999-010-1636-6, 3094610, 20972653.
8. Cyteval C, Sarrabère MP, Cottin A, Assi C, Morcos L, Maury P, Taourel P. Iliopsoas impingement on the acetabular component: radiologic and computed tomography findings of a rare hip prosthesis complication in eight cases. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2003, 27(2):183-188. 10.1097/00004728-200303000-00014, 12703010.
9. Kluess D, Zietz C, Lindner T, Mittelmeier W, Schmitz KP, Bader R. Limited range of motion of hip resurfacing arthroplasty due to unfavorable ratio of prosthetic head size and femoral neck diameter. Acta Orthop 2008, 79(6):748-754. 10.1080/17453670810016803, 19085490.
10. Malik A, Maheshwari A, Dorr LD. Impingement with total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007, 89(8):1832-1842. 10.2106/JBJS.F.01313, 17671025.
11. Murray DW. The definition and measurement of acetabular orientation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1993, 75(2):228-232.
12. Nunley RM, Keeney JA, Zhu J, Clohisy JC, Barrack RL. The reliability and variation of acetabular component anteversion measurements from cross-table lateral radiographs. J Arthroplasty 2011, 26(6 Suppl):84-87.
13. Langton DJ, Sprowson AP, Mahadeva D, Bhatnagar S, Holland JP, Nargol AV. Cup anteversion in hip resurfacing: validation of EBRA and the presentation of a simple clinical grading system. J Arthroplasty 2010, 25(4):607-613. 10.1016/j.arth.2009.08.020, 20022454.
14. McLaren RH. Prosthetic hip angulation. Radiology 1973, 107:705-706.
15. Widmer KH. A simplified method to determine acetabular cup anteversion from plain radiographs. J Arthroplasty 2004, 19:387-390. 10.1016/j.arth.2003.10.016, 15067657.
16. Kalteis T, Handel M, Herold T, Perlick L, Paetzel C, Grifka J. Position of the acetabular cup - accuracy of radiographic calculation compared to CT-based measurement. Eur J Radiol 2006, 58:294-300. 10.1016/j.ejrad.2005.10.003, 16289687.
17. Lazennec JY, Boyer P, Gorin M, Catonné Y, Rousseau MA. Acetabular anteversion with CT in supine, simulated standing, and sitting positions in a THA patient population. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011, 469(4):1103-1109. 10.1007/s11999-010-1732-7, 3048248, 21161739.
18. Olivecrona H, Weidenhielm L, Olivecrona L, Beckman MO, Stark A, Noz ME, Maguire GQ, Zeleznik MP, Svensson L, Jonson T. A new CT method for measuring cup orientation after total hip arthroplasty: a study of 10 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 2004, 75:252-260. 10.1080/00016470410001169, 15260415.
19. Hart AJ, Dandachli W, Schlueter-Brust K, Henckel J, Cobb J. Large ball metal on metal hips obscure cup angle measurement on plain radiographs. Hip Int 2009, 19(4):323-329.