The reliability and variation of acetabular component anteversion measurements from cross-table lateral radiographs

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 26, Issue SUPPL. 6, 2011, Pages 84-87

  Nunley, Ryan M ^a   Keeney, James A ^a   Zhu, Jinjun ^a   Clohisy, John C ^a   Barrack, Robert L ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Anteversion; Cross table lateral; CT

Indexed keywords

ACETABULAR COMPONENT ANTEVERSION; ACETABULUM PROSTHESIS; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CORRELATIONAL STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DISEASE SURVEILLANCE; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEASUREMENT; PELVIS RADIOGRAPHY; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; RELIABILITY; X RAY FILM;

EID: 84868300314     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: 15328406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.03.039     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Wan Z, Boutary M, Dorr LD. The influence of acetabular component position on wear in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2008;23:51.
2. Barrack RL. Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: implant design and orientation. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2003;11:89.
3. Lewinnek GE, Lewis JL, Tarr R, et al. Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1978;60:217.
4. Biedermann R, Tonin A, Krismer M, et al. Reducing the risk of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: the effect of orientation of the acetabular component. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005;87:762.
5. Patil S, Bergula A, Chen PC, et al. Polyethylene wear and acetabular component orientation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003;85-A(Suppl 4):56.
6. Barrack RL, Lavernia C, Ries M, et al. Virtual reality computer animation of the effect of component position and design on stability after total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 2001;32:569 vii.
7. Harris WH. Advances in surgical technique for total hip replacement: without and with osteotomy of the greater trochanter. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1980;188.
8. Wines AP, McNicol D. Computed tomography measurement of the accuracy of component version in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2006;21:696.
9. Mian SW, Truchly G, Pflum FA. Computed tomography measurement of acetabular cup anteversion and retroversion in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1992; 206.
10. Kalteis T, Handel M, Herold T, et al. Position of the acetabular cup-accuracy of radiographic calculation compared to CT-based measurement. Eur J Radiol 2006; 58:294.
11. McCollum DE, Gray WJ. Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. Causes and prevention. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1990;159.
12. Yoon YS, Hodgson AJ, Tonetti J, et al. Resolving inconsistencies in defining the target orientation for the acetabular cup angles in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2008;23:253.
13. Arai N, Nakamura S, Matsushita T. Difference between 2 measurement methods of version angles of the acetabular component. J Arthroplasty 2007;22:715.
14. Widmer KH. A simplified method to determine acetabular cup anteversion from plain radiographs. J Arthroplasty 2004;19:387.
15. Hassan DM, Johnston GH, Dust WN, et al. Radiographic calculation of anteversion in acetabular prostheses. J Arthroplasty 1995;10:369.
16. Marx A, von Knoch M, Pfortner J, et al. Misinterpretation of cup anteversion in total hip arthroplasty using planar radiography. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2006; 126:487.
17. Langton DJ, Jameson SS, Joyce TJ, et al. The effect of component size and orientation on the concentrations of metal ions after resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008;90:1143.
18. De Haan R, Campbell PA, Su EP, et al. Revision of metalon-metal resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip: the influence of malpositioning of the components. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008;90:1158.
19. Murray DW. The definition and measurement of acetabular orientation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1993;75:228.
20. Pollard JA, Daum WJ, Uchida T. Can simple radiographs be predictive of total hip dislocation? J Arthroplasty 1995; 10:800.
21. Paterno SA, Lachiewicz PF, Kelley SS. The influence of patient-related factors and the position of the acetabular component on the rate of dislocation after total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1997;79:1202.
22. Frank ED, Long BW, Smith BJ. Merrill's Atlas of Radiographic Positioning & Procedures. 11th ed. St. Louis, MO: Mosby\Elsevier; 2007.
23. Yao L, Yao J, Gold RH. Measurement of acetabular version on the axiolateral radiograph. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1995;106.
24. Pierchon F, Pasquier G, Cotten A, et al. Causes of dislocation of total hip arthroplasty. CT study of component alignment. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1994;76:45.
25. Morlock MM, Bishop N, Zustin J, et al. Modes of implant failure after hip resurfacing: morphological and wear analysis of 267 retrieval specimens. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008;90(Suppl 3):89.
26. Dorr LD. Acetabular cup position: the imperative of getting it right. Orthopedics 2008;31:898.
27. Langton DJ, Jameson SS, Joyce TJ, et al. Early failure of metal-on-metal bearings in hip resurfacing and largediameter total hip replacement: a consequence of excess wear. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2010;92:38.
28. Walter WL, O'Toole GC, Walter WK, et al. Squeaking in ceramic-on-ceramic hips: the importance of acetabular component orientation. J Arthroplasty 2007;22:496.
29. Ackland MK, Bourne WB, Uhthoff HK. Anteversion of the acetabular cup. Measurement of angle after total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1986;68:409.
30. Pradhan R. Planar anteversion of the acetabular cup as determined from plain anteroposterior radiographs. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1999;81:431.
31. McLaren DS, Yaktin US, Kanawati AA, et al. The subsequent mental and physical development of rehabilitated marasmic infants. J Ment Defic Res 1973;17:273.
32. Ghelman B, Kepler CK, Lyman S, et al. CT outperforms radiography for determination of acetabular cup version after THA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009.
33. Lembeck B, Mueller O, Reize P, et al. Pelvic tilt makes acetabular cup navigation inaccurate. Acta Orthop 2005;76:517.
34. Nishii T, Sugano N, Miki H, et al. Influence of component positions on dislocation: computed tomographic evaluations in a consecutive series of total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2004;19:162.
35. Parratte S, Pagnano MW, Coleman-Wood K, et al. The 2008 Frank Stinchfield award: variation in postoperative pelvic tilt may confound the accuracy of hip navigation systems. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009;467:43.