Rapid adaptation to mammalian sociality via sexually selected traits

BMC Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Nelson, Adam C ^a,b   Colson, Kevin E ^c   Harmon, Steve ^d   Potts, Wayne K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

^b HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA FAIRBANKS   (United States)

^d OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Chemical communication; Mate choice; Sexual selection; Social selection; Tradeoffs

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; BREEDING POPULATION; DOMINANCE; FECUNDITY; FITNESS; INTRASEXUAL INTERACTION; LABORATORY METHOD; MATE CHOICE; MATING SUCCESS; REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS; RODENT; SEX-RELATED DIFFERENCE; SEXUAL SELECTION; SOCIAL NETWORK; SPERM COMPETITION; SURVIVORSHIP; TRADE-OFF;

ANIMALIA; MAMMALIA; MUS;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; GENETICS; MALE; MATE CHOICE; MOUSE; PHYSIOLOGY; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL DOMINANCE; TERRITORIALITY;

ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; FEMALE; MALE; MATING PREFERENCE, ANIMAL; MICE; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; SOCIAL DOMINANCE; TERRITORIALITY;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 84875936571     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712148     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-13-81     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Monogamy and the battle of the sexes. Hosken DJ, Stockley P, Tregenza T, Wedell N, Annu Rev Entomol 2009 54 1 361 378 10.1146/annurev.ento.54.110807. 090608 18793102
2. The strength of indirect selection on female mating preferences. Kirkpatrick M, Barton NH, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1997 94 4 1282 1286 10.1073/pnas.94.4.1282 9037044
3. Good genes sexual selection in nature. Byers JA, Waits L, Proc Natl Acad Sci 2006 103 44 16343 16345 10.1073/pnas.0608184103 17060640
4. Maternal effects, paternal effects and sexual selection. Qvarnström A, Price TD, Trends Ecol Evol 2001 16 2 95 100 10.1016/S0169-5347(00)02063-2 11165708
5. Free female mate choice in house mice affects reproductive success and offspring viability and performance. Drickamer LC, Gowaty PA, Holmes CM, Anim Behav 2000 59 2 371 378 10.1006/anbe.1999.1316 10675259
6. Male house mice produce fewer offspring with lower viability and poorer performance when mated with females they do not prefer. Gowaty PA, Drickamer LC, Schmid-Holmes S, Anim Behav 2003 65 1 95 103 10.1006/anbe.2002.2026
7. Oestrous female house mice discriminate dominant from subordinate males and sons of dominant from sons of subordinate males by odour cues. Drickamer LC, Anim Behav 1992 43 868 870 10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80212-X
8. Long-term fitness benefits of polyandry in a small mammal, the bank vole Clethrionomys glareolus. Klemme I, Ylönen H, Eccard JA, Proc R Soc B: Biol Sci 2008 275 1638 1095 1100 10.1098/rspb.2008.0038
9. Polyandrous females benefit by producing sons that achieve high reproductive success in a competitive environment. Firman RC, Proc R Soc B: Biol Sci 2011 278 1719 2823 2831 10.1098/rspb.2010.2791
10. The intensity of sexual selection in relation to male sexual behaviour, female choice, and sperm precedence. Wade MJ, Arnold SJ, Anim Behav 1980 28 2 446 461 10.1016/S0003-3472(80)80052-2
11. Sexual selection and mating systems. Shuster SM, Proc Natl Acad Sci 2009 106 Supplement 1 10009 10016 19528645
12. Sexual selection, social competition and speciation. West Eberhard MJ, Q Rev Biol 1983 58 155 183 10.1086/413215
13. Sexual selection is a form of social selection. Lyon BE, Montgomerie R, Philos Trans R Soc B: Biol Sci 2012 367 1600 2266 2273 10.1098/rstb.2012.0012
14. Experimental constraints on mate preferences in Drosophila pseudoobscura decrease offspring viability and fitness of mated pairs. Anderson WW, Kim YK, Gowaty PA, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007 104 11 4484 4488 10.1073/pnas. 0611152104 17360550
15. Mate choice increases a component of offspring fitness in fruit flies. Partridge L, Nature 1980 283 290 291 10.1038/283290a0
16. Direct and indirect fitness consequences of female choice in a crustacean. Cothran RD, Evolution 2008 62 7 1666 1675 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008. 00403.x 18410531
17. Sexy sons from re-mating do not recoup the direct costs of harmful male interactions in the Drosophila melanogaster laboratory model system. Orteiza N, Linder JE, Rice WR, J Evol Biol 2005 18 5 1315 1323 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2005. 00923.x 16135126
18. Sexual conflict is not counterbalanced by good genes in the laboratory Drosophila melanogaster model system. Stewart AD, Hannes AM, Mirzatuny A, Rice WR, J Evol Biol 2008 21 6 1808 1813 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2008.01593.x 18681915
19. Populations with elevated mutation load do not benefit from the operation of sexual selection. Hollis B, Houle D, J Evol Biol 2011 24 9 1918 1926 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2011.02323.x 21658188
20. Polyandry produces sexy sons at the cost of daughters in red flour beetles. Pai A, Yan G, Proc Biol Sci 2002 269 1489 361 368 10.1098/rspb.2001. 1893 11886623
21. Extra-pair mating in the spotted sandpiper: a female mate acquisition tactic. Colwell M, Oring L, Anim Behav 1989 38 4 675 684 10.1016/S0003-3472(89) 80013-2
22. Sexual conflict and female choice. Eberhard WG, Cordero C, Trends Ecol Evol 2003 18 9 438 439 10.1016/S0169-5347(03)00180-0
23. Heritable variation for territorial success in two Drosophila melanogaster populations. Hoffmann AA, Anim Behav 1988 36 4 1180 1189 10.1016/S0003-3472(88)80077-0
24. Reproductive behavior of Drosophila melanogaster and D. nigrospiracula in the field and in the laboratory. Markow TA, J Comp Psychol 1988 102 2 169 173 3135147
25. Alcock J, Animal behavior Sunderland: Sinauer Associates 8 2005
26. Mate selection-a selection for a handicap. Zahavi A, J Theor Biol 1975 53 205 214 10.1016/0022-5193(75)90111-3 1195756
27. Sexual conflict. Chapman T, Arnqvist G, Bangham J, Rowe L, Trends Ecol Evol 2003 18 1 41 47 10.1016/S0169-5347(02)00004-6
28. Developmental plasticity and the evolution of parental effects. Uller T, Trends Ecol Evol 2008 23 8 432 438 10.1016/j.tree.2008.04.005 18586350
29. Maternal effects on the development of social rank and immunity trade-offs in male laboratory mice (Mus musculus). Barnard CJ, Behnke JM, Gage AR, Brown H, Smithurst PR, Proc R Soc London, Ser B 1998 265 1410 2087 2093 10.1098/rspb.1998.0544
30. Social dominance rank and accessory sex glands in wild adult male house mice born to food-deprived mothers. Meikle D, Westberg M, Physiol Behav 2001 72 3 359 364 10.1016/S0031-9384(00)00420-0 11274678
31. History of two local outbreaks of feral house mice. Pearson OP, Ecology 1963 44 3 540 549 10.2307/1932533
32. Kin interactions and changing social structure during a population outbreak of feral house mice. Sutherland DR, Spencer PBS, Singleton GR, Taylor AC, Mol Ecol 2005 14 9 2803 2814 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02623.x 16029479
33. Wild mice. Sage RD, The mouse in biomedical research. vol. I N.Y: Academic, Foster HL, Smalll JD, Fox JG, 1981 40 90
34. The reproductive ecology of the house mouse. Bronson FH, Q Rev Biol 1979 54 265 299 10.1086/411295 390600
35. Mating behavior and female choice: their relation to social structure in wild caught House mice (Mus musculus) housed in a semi-natural environment. Wolff RJ, J Zool 1985 207 43 51
36. Mating patterns in seminatural populations of mice influenced by MHC genotype. Potts WK, Manning CJ, Wakeland EK, Nature 1991 352 619 621 10.1038/352619a0 1865924
37. Dangerous liaisons. Rice WR, Proc Natl Acad Sci 2000 97 24 12953 12955 10.1073/pnas.97.24.12953 11087851
38. Major histocompatibility complex heterozygosity reduces fitness in experimentally infected mice. Ilmonen P, Penn DJ, Damjanovich K, Morrison L, Ghotbi L, Potts WK, Genetics 2007 176 4 2501 2508 10.1534/genetics.107.074815 17603099
39. Male-male competition magnifies inbreeding depression in wild house mice. Meagher S, Penn DJ, Potts WK, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000 97 7 3324 3329 10.1073/pnas.97.7.3324 10716731
40. Transgenerational epigenetic effects. Youngson NA, Whitelaw E, Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 2008 9 233 257 10.1146/annurev.genom.9.081307.164445 18767965
41. Maestripieri D, Mateo JM, Maternal effects in mammals Chicago: The University of Chicago Press 2009
42. The frequency of multiple paternity suggests that sperm competition is common in house mice (Mus domesticus). Dean MD, Ardlie KG, Nachman MW, Mol Ecol 2006 15 13 4141 4151 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2006.03068.x 17054508
43. Communal nesting patterns in mice implicate MHC genes in kin recognition. Manning CJ, Wakeland EK, Potts WK, Nature 1992 360 581 583 10.1038/360581a0 1461279
44. Experimental infection magnifies inbreeding depression in house mice. Ilmonen P, Penn DJ, Damjanovich K, Clarke J, Lamborn D, Morrison L, Ghotbi L, Potts WK, J Evol Biol 2008 21 834 841 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2008.01510.x 18312317
45. Fitness effects of a selfish gene are revealed in an ecological context. Carroll LS, Meagher S, Morrison L, Penn DJ, Potts WK, Evolution 2004 58 1318 1328 15266980
46. Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment. Kalinowski ST, Taper ML, Marshall TC, Mol Ecol 2007 16 5 1099 1106 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03089.x 17305863
47. The evolutionary ecology of the major histocompatibility complex. Piertney SB, Oliver MK, Heredity 2006 96 1 7 21 16094301
48. MHC signaling during social communication. Ruff JS, Nelson AC, Kubinak JL, Potts WK, Self and nonself. vol. 738 US: Springer, López-Larrea C, 2012 290 313
49. MHC studies in nonmodel vertebrates: what have we learned about natural selection in 15 years? Bernatchez L, Landry C, J Evol Biol 2003 16 3 363 377 10.1046/j.1420-9101.2003.00531.x 14635837
50. Free female choice in house mice: leaving best for last. Rolland C, MacDonald DW, de Fraipont M, Berdoy M, Behaviour 2003 140 18 1371 1388
51. Dominance rank, copulatory behavior, and differential reproduction. Dewsbury DA, Q Rev Biol 1982 57 2 135 159 10.1086/412672 7051088
52. Experimental evolution of sperm quality via postcopulatory sexual selection in house mice. Firman RC, Simmons LW, Evolution 2010 64 5 1245 1256 19922447
53. Sexual selection, sexual conflict and the evolution of ageing and life span. Bonduriansky R, Maklakov A, Zajitschek F, Brooks R, Funct Ecol 2008 22 3 443 453 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2008.01417.x
54. The evolution of female mate choice by sexual conflict. Gavrilets S, Arnqvist G, Friberg U, Proc R Soc London, Ser B 2001 268 1466 531 539 10.1098/rspb.2000.1382
55. The indirect benefits of mating with attractive males outweigh the direct costs. Head ML, Hunt J, Jennions MD, Brooks R, Plos Biology 2005 3 2 289 294
56. Negative genetic correlation between male sexual attractiveness and survival. Brooks R, Nature 2000 406 6791 67 70 10.1038/35017552 10894542
57. A pacific culture among wild baboons: its emergence and transmission. Sapolsky RM, Share LJ, PLoS Biol 2004 2 4 106 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020106 15094808
58. Good genes and the maternal effects of polyandry on offspring reproductive success in the bulb mite. Kozielska M, Krzeminska A, Radwan J, Proc R Soc London, Ser B 2004 271 1535 165 170 10.1098/rspb.2003.2585
59. Metabolic and endocrine consequences of social stress in a visible burrow system. Tamashiro KL, Nguyen MM, Fujikawa T, Xu T, Yun Ma L, Woods SC, Sakai RR, Physiol Behav 2004 80 5 683 693 10.1016/j.physbeh.2003.12.002 14984803
60. Impact of prenatal stress on long term body weight is dependent on timing and maternal sensitivity. Mueller BR, Bale TL, Physiol Behav 2006 88 4-5 605 614 16828814
61. Fathers and sons: genetic and social dominance in deer mice, Peromyscus maniculatus. Dewsbury DA, Anim Behav 1990 39 2 284 289 10.1016/S0003-3472(05) 80872-3
62. Paternally induced transgenerational environmental reprogramming of metabolic gene expression in mammals. Carone BR, Fauquier L, Habib N, Shea JM, Hart CE, Li R, Bock C, Li C, Gu H, Zamore PD, Cell 2010 143 7 1084 1096 10.1016/j.cell.2010.12.008 21183072