Direct and indirect fitness consequences of female choice in a crustacean

Evolution

Volumn 62, Issue 7, 2008, Pages 1666-1675

  Cothran, Rickey D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

Author keywords

Amphipods; Direct benefits; Genetic benefits; Hyalella; Sexual selection

Indexed keywords

AMPHIPOD; BIOENERGETICS; COPULATION; CRUSTACEAN; FEMALE BEHAVIOR; FITNESS; MATE CHOICE; SEXUAL DIMORPHISM; SEXUAL SELECTION;

AMPHIPODA; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BODY SIZE; ENERGY METABOLISM; FEMALE; GENETIC SELECTION; MALE; MATE CHOICE; PHYSIOLOGY; PREDATION; REPRODUCTION;

AMPHIPODA; ANIMALS; BODY SIZE; ENERGY METABOLISM; FEMALE; MALE; MATING PREFERENCE, ANIMAL; PREDATORY BEHAVIOR; REPRODUCTION; SELECTION (GENETICS);

AMPHIPODA; CRUSTACEA; HYALELLA;

EID: 47349109791     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00403.x     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Andersson, M. B. 1994. Sexual selection. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
2. Arnqvist, G., and L. Rowe. 2005. Sexual conflict. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
3. Beenakkers, A. M. 1969. Carbohydrate and fat as a fuel for insect flight. A comparative study. J. Insect Physiol. 15 : 353 361.
4. Borgia, G. 1979. Sexual selection and the evolution of mating systems. Pp. 19 80 in N. A. Blum and N. A. Blum eds. Sexual selection and reproductive competition in insects. Academic Press, New York.
5. Borowsky, B. 1984. The use of the males' gnathopods during precopulation in some Gammaridean amphipods. Crustaceana 47 : 245 250.
6. Brooks, R. 2000. Negative genetic correlation between male sexual attractiveness and survival. Nature 406 : 67 70.
7. Burley, N. 1986. Sexual selection for aesthetic traits in a species with biparental care. Am. Nat. 127 : 415 445.
8. Burley, N. 1988. The differential-allocation hypothesis: an experimental test. Am. Nat. 132 : 611 628.
9. Byers, J. A., and L. Waits. 2006. Good genes sexual selection in nature. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103 : 16343 16345.
10. Cameron, E., T. Day, and L. Rowe. 2003. Sexual conflict and indirect benefits. J. Evol. Biol. 16 : 1055 1060.
11. Candolin, U. 2003. The use of multiple cues in mate choice. Biol. Rev. 78 : 575 595.
12. Chapman, T., G. Arnqvist, J. Bangham, and L. Rowe. 2003. Sexual conflict. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18 : 41 47.
13. Cordero, A., and W. G. Eberhard. 2003. Female choice of sexually antagonistic male adaptations: a critical review of some current research. J. Evol. Biol. 16 : 1 6.
14. Cothran, R. D. 2004. Precopulatory mate guarding affects predation risk in two freshwater amphipod species. Anim. Behav. 68 : 1133 1138.
15. Cothran, R. D. In press. Phenotypic manipulation reveals sexual conflict over precopula duration. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol.
16. Diaz, E. R., and M. Thiel. 2004. Chemical and visual communication during mate searching in rock shrimp. Biol. Bull. 206 : 134 143.
17. Downer, R. G. H., and J. R. Matthews. 1976. Patterns of lipid distribution and utilisation in insects. Am. Zool. 16 : 733 745.
18. Edwards, T. D., and B. C. Cowell. 1992. Population-dynamics and secondary production of Hyalella azteca (Amphipoda) in typha stands of a subtropical Florida lake. J. North Am. Benthol. Soc. 11 : 69 79.
19. Eshel, I., I. Volovik, and E. Sansone. 2000. On Fisher-Zahavi's handicapped son. Evol. Ecol. Res. 2 : 509 523.
20. Evans, J. P., J. L. Kelley, A. Bisazza, E. Finazoo, and A. Pilastro. 2004. Sire attractiveness influences offspring performance in guppies. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 271 : 2035 2042.
21. Fisher, R. A. 1930. The genetical theory of natural selection. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.
22. Hardy, I. C. W., and S. A. Field. 1998. Logistic analysis of animal contests. Anim. Behav. 56 : 787 792.
23. Head, M. L., J. Hunt, M. D. Jennions, and R. Brooks. 2005. The indirect benefits of mating with attractive males outweigh the direct costs. PLOS Biol. 3 : 289 294.
24. Heisler, I. L. 1985. Quantitative genetic models of female choice based on arbitrary male characters. Heredity 55 : 187 198.
25. Hine, E., S. Lachish, M. Higgie, and M. W. Blows. 2002. Positive genetic correlation between female preference and offspring fitness. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 269 : 2215 2219.
26. Holland, B., and W. R. Rice. 1998. Perspective: chase-away sexual selection: antagonistic seduction versus resistance. Evolution 52 : 1 7.
27. Iyengar, V. K., and T. Eisner. 1999. Female choice increases offspring fitness in an arctiid moth (Uetheisa ornatrix). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96 : 15013 15016.
28. Jennions, M. D., and M. Petrie. 1997. Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: a review of causes and consequences. Biol. Rev. 72 : 283 327.
29. Jones, T. M., R. J. Quinnell, and A. Balmford. 1998. Fisherian flies: benefits of female choice in a lekking sandfly. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 265 : 1651 1657.
30. Jormalainen, V. 2007. Mating strategies is isopods - from mate monopolization to conflicts. Pp. 167 190 in E. Duffy and M. Thiel, eds. Evolutionary ecology of social and sexual systems: crustaceans as model organisms. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
31. Jormalainen, V., S. Merilaita, and R. Härdling. 2000. Dynamics of intersexual conflict over precopulatory mate guarding in two populations of the isopod Idotea baltica. Anim. Behav. 60 : 85 93.
32. Jormalainen, V., S. Merilaita, and J. Riihimäki. 2001. Costs of intersexual conflict in the isopod Idotea baltica. J. Evol. Biol. 14 : 763 772.
33. Kelly, L. S., and T. W. Snell. 2004. Role of surface glycoproteins in mate-guarding of the marine harpacticoid Tigriopus japonicus. Marine Biol. 130 : 606 612.
34. Kirkpatrick, M. 1996. Good genes and direct selection in the evolution of mating preferences. Evolution 50 : 2125 2140.
35. Kirkpatrick, M., and N. H. Barton. 1997. The strength of indirect selection on female mating preferences. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94 : 1282 1286.
36. Kokko, H. 2001. Fisherian and "good genes" benefits of mate choice: how (not) to distinguish between them. Ecol. Letts. 4 : 322 326.
37. Kokko, H., R. Brooks, J. M. McNamara, and A. I. Houston. 2002. The sexual selection continuum. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 269 : 1331 1340.
38. Kokko, H., R. Brooks, M. D. Jennions, and J. Morley. 2003. The evolution of mate choice and mating biases. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 270 : 653 664.
39. Kokko, H., M. D. Jennions, and R. Brooks. 2006. Unifying and testing models of sexual selection. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 37 : 43 66.
40. Kotiaho, J. S., L. W. Simmons, and J. L. Tomkins. 2001. Towards a resolution of the lek paradox. Nature 410 : 684 686.
41. Møller, A. P., and M. D. Jennions. 2001. How important are direct fitness benefits of sexual selection? Naturwissenschaften 88 : 401 415.
42. Moore, P. A., and D. A. Bergman. 2005. The smell of success and failure: the role of intrinsic and extrinsic chemical signals on the social behavior of crayfish. Integr. Comp. Biol. 45 : 650 657.
43. Quinn, G. P., and M. J. Keough. 2002. Experimental design and data analysis for biologists. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
44. Reynolds, J. D., and M. R. Gross. 1990. Costs and benefits of female mate choice: is there a lek paradox? Am. Nat. 136 : 230 243.
45. Reynolds, J. D., and M. R. Gross. 1992. Female mate preference enhances offspring growth and reproduction in a fish, Poecilia reticulata. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 250 : 57 62.
46. Rice, W. R., and A. K. Chippindale. 2001. Intersexual ontogenetic conflict. J. Evol. Biol. 14 : 685 693.
47. Rowe, L. 1994. The costs of mating and mate choice in water striders. Anim. Behav. 48 : 1049 1056.
48. Rowe, L., G. Arnqvist, A. Sih, and J. J. Krupa. 1994. Sexual conflict and the evolutionary ecology of mating patterns: water striders as a model system. Trends Ecol. Evol. 9 : 289 293.
49. Rundle, H. D., A. Ödeen, and A. Ø. Mooers. 2007. An experimental test for indirect benefits in Drosophila melanogaster. BMC Evol. Biol. 7 : 36.
50. Sappington, T. W., and O. R. Taylor. 1990. Genetic sources of pheromone variation in Colias eurytheme butterflies. J. Chem. Ecol. 16 : 2755 2770.
51. Schluter, D. 1988. Estimating the form of natural selection on a quantitative trait. Evolution 42 : 849 861.
52. Schluter, D. 2001. Ecology and the origin of species. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16 : 372 380.
53. Sheldon, B. C., J. Merilä, A. Qvarnstrom, L. Gustafsson, and H. Ellegren. 1997. Paternal genetic contribution to offspring condition predicted by size of male secondary sexual character. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 264 : 297 302.
54. Sparkes, T. C., D. P. Keogh, and K. E. Haskins. 2000. Female resistance and male preference in a stream-dwelling isopod: effects of female molt characteristics. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 47 : 145 155.
55. Strong, D. R. 1973. Amphipod amplexus, the significance of ecotypic variation. Ecology 54 : 1383 1388.
56. Thornhill, R. 1983. Cryptic female choice and its implications in the scorpionfly Harpobittacus nigriceps. Am. Nat. 122 : 765 788.
57. van Handel, E. 1965. Microseparation of glycogen, sugars and lipid. Anal. Biochem. 11 : 266 271.
58. van Handel, E 1985a. Rapid determination of glycogen and sugars in mosquitoes. J. Am. Mosq. Control Assoc. 1 : 299 301.
59. van Handel, E 1985b. Rapid determination of lipids in mosquitoes. J. Am. Mosq. Control Assoc. 1 : 302 303.
60. Warburg, M. S., and B. Yuval. 1997. Effects of energetic reserves on behavioral patterns of Mediterranean fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae). Oecologia 112 : 314 319.
61. Ward, P. I. 1986. A comparative field study of the breeding behavior of a stream and a pond population of Gammarus pulex (Amphipoda). Oikos 46 : 29 36.
62. Watson, P. J., G. Arnqvist, and R. R. Stallmann. 1998. Sexual conflict and the energetic costs of mate choice in water striders. Am. Nat. 151 : 46 58.
63. Welch, A. M., R. D. Semlitsch, and H. C. Gerhardt. 1998. Call duration as an indicator of genetic quality in male gray tree frogs. Science 280 : 1928 1930.
64. Wellborn, G. A. 1994. Size-biased predation and prey life histories: a comparative study of freshwater amphipod populations. Ecology 75 : 2104 2117.
65. Wellborn, G. A. 1995. Determinates of reproductive success in a freshwater amphipod species that experience different mortality regimes. Anim. Behav. 50 : 353 363.
66. Wellborn, G. A., and S. A. Bartholf. 2005. Ecological context and the importance of body and gnathopod size in two amphipod ecomorphs. Oecologia 143 : 308 316.
67. Wellborn, G. A., and R. D. Cothran. 2004. Phenotypic similarity and differentiation among sympatric cryptic species in a freshwater amphipod species complex. Fresh. Biol. 49 : 1 13.
68. Wellborn, G. A., and R. D. Cothran. 2007. Evolution and ecology of mating behavior in freshwater amphipods. Pp. 147 166 in E. Duffy and M. Thiel, eds. Evolutionary ecology of social and sexual systems: crustaceans as model organisms. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
69. Wellborn, G. A., R. Cothran, and S. Bartholf. 2005. Life history and allozyme diversification in regional ecomorphs of the Hyalella azteca (Crustacea : Amphipoda) species complex. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 84 : 161 175.
70. Wilcox, R. R. 1987. Pairwise comparisons of J independent regression lines over a finite interval, simultaneous pairwise comparisons of their parameter, and the Johnson-Neyman procedure. British J. Math. Stat. Psychol. 40 : 80 93.
71. Widemo, F., and S. A. Saether. 1999. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder: causes and consequences of variation in mating preferences. Trends Ecol. Evol. 14 : 26 31.
72. Witt, J. D. S., and P. D. N. Hebert. 2000. Cryptic species diversity and evolution in the amphipod genus Hyalella within central glaciated North America: a molecular phylogenetic approach. Can. J. Fish Aquat. Sci. 57 : 687 698.
73. Witt, J. D. S., D. L. Threloff, and P. D. N. Hebert. 2006. DNA barcoding reveals extraordinary cryptic diversity in an amphipod genus: implications for desert spring conservation. Mol. Ecol. 15 : 3073 3082.
74. Zahavi, A. 1975. Mate selection - selection for a handicap. J. Theor. Biol. 53 : 205 214.