The influence of rapid onsite evaluation on the adequacy rate of fine-needle aspiration cytology: A systematic review and meta-analysis

American Journal of Clinical Pathology

Volumn 139, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 300-308

  Schmidt, Robert L ^a   Witt, Benjamin L ^a   Lopez Calderon, Leslie E ^c   Layfield, Lester J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UTAH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c University of Missouri   (United States)

Author keywords

Adequacy; Fine needle aspiration (FNA); Meta analysis; Modeling; Rapid onsite evaluation (ROSE)

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASPIRATION CYTOLOGY; ATTRIBUTABLE RISK; BREAST; CYTOPATHOLOGY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; EVALUATION AND FOLLOW UP; FINE NEEDLE ASPIRATION BIOPSY; GENERAL PATHOLOGICAL PARAMETERS; HUMAN; LUNG LYMPH; LYMPH NODE; MEDIASTINUM; META ANALYSIS; NECK; PANCREAS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAPID ONSITE EVALUATION; SOFT TISSUE; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; THYROID GLAND; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; METHODOLOGY; REVIEW; STANDARD;

BIOPSY, FINE-NEEDLE; HUMANS; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 84875910402     PISSN: 00029173     EISSN: 19437722     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1309/AJCPEGZMJKC42VUP     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Schmidt R, Factor RE, Affolter KE, et al. Methods specification for diagnostic test accuracy studies in fineneedle aspiration cytology: A survey of reporting practice. Am J Clin Pathol. 2012;137:132-141.
2. Moller K, Papanikolaou IS, Toermer T, et al. EUS-guided FNA of solid pancreatic masses: High yield of 2 passes with combined histologic-cytologic analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;70:60-69.
3. Cleveland P, Gill KRS, Coe SG, et al. An evaluation of risk factors for inadequate cytology in EUS-guided FNA of pancreatic tumors and lymph nodes. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;71:1194-1199.
4. LeBlanc JK, Ciaccia D, Al-Assi MT, et al. Optimal number of EUS-guided fine needle passes needed to obtain a correct diagnosis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;59:475-481.
5. Sakamoto H, Kitano M, Komaki T, et al. Prospective comparative study of the EUS guided 25-gauge FNA needle with the 19-gauge Trucut needle and 22-gauge FNA needle in patients with solid pancreatic masses. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;24:384-390.
6. Iqbal S, Mir RN, Sohn W. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration using 22-and 25-gauge needles alternately. Endoscopy. 2009;41(suppl 2):E87.
7. Imazu H, Uchiyama Y, Kakutani H, et al. A prospective comparison of EUS-guided FNA using 25-gauge and 22-gauge needles. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2009;2009:546390.
8. Siddiqui AA, Lyles T, Avula H, et al. Endoscopic ultrasoundguided fine needle aspiration of pancreatic masses in a veteran population: Comparison of results with 22-and 25-gauge needles. Pancreas. 2010;39:685-686.
9. Ljung BM, Drejet A, Chiampi N, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of fine-needle aspiration biopsy is determined by physician training in sampling technique. Cancer. 2001;93:263-268.
10. Choi SH, Han KH, Yoon JH, et al. Factors affecting inadequate sampling of ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy of thyroid nodules. Clin Endocrinol. 2011;74:776-782.
11. Klapman JB, Logrono R, Dye CE, et al. Clinical impact of on-site cytopathology interpretation on endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98:1289-1294.
12. Iglesias-Garcia J, Dominguez-Munoz JE, Abdulkader I, et al. Influence of on-site cytopathology evaluation on the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) of solid pancreatic masses. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011;106:1705-1710.
13. Deeks JJ, Bossuyt PM, Gatsonis C, eds. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy, Version 1.0.0. Oxford, England: Cochrane Collaboration; 2009.
14. Leeflang MM, Deeks JJ, Gatsonis C, et al Cochrane Diagnostic Test Accuracy Working Group. Systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy. Ann Int Med. 2008;149:889-897.
15. Higgins JP, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002;21:1539-1558.
16. Azabdaftari G, Goldberg SN, Wang HH. Efficacy of on-site specimen adequacy evaluation of image-guided fine and core needle biopsies. Acta Cytol. 2010;54:132-137.
17. Davenport RD. Rapid on-site evaluation of transbronchial aspirates. Chest. 1990;98:59-61.
18. Diette GB, White P Jr, Terry P, et al. Utility of on-site cytopathology assessment for bronchoscopic evaluation of lung masses and adenopathy. Chest. 2000;117:1186-1190.
19. Dray M, Mayall F, Darlington A. Improved fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytology results with a near patient diagnosis service for breast lesions. Cytopathology. 2000;11:32-37.
20. Ghofrani M, Beckman D, Rimm DL. The value of onsite adequacy assessment of thyroid fine-needle aspirations is a function of operator experience. Cancer. 2006;108:110-113.
21. Hamill J, Campbell ID, Mayall F, et al. Improved breast cytology results with near patient FNA diagnosis. Acta Cytol. 2002;46:19-24.
22. Iglesias García J, Lariño Noia J, Domínguez Muñoz JE. Endoscopic ultrasound in the diagnosis and staging of pancreatic cancer. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2009;101:631-638.
23. Jamil LH, Jones A, Khoor A, et al. Onsite cytopathology improves yield in endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) guided fine needle aspiration of mediastinal lymph nodes: A prospective blinded study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;69:AB332.
24. Jing X, Michael CW, Pu RT. The clinical and diagnostic impact of using standard criteria of adequacy assessment and diagnostic terminology on thyroid nodule fine needle aspiration. Diagn Cytopathol. 2008;36:161-166.
25. Kucuk CU, Yilmaz A, Akkaya E. Computed tomographyguided transthoracic fine-needle aspiration in diagnosis of lung cancer: A comparison of single-pass needle and multiplepass coaxial needle systems and the value of immediate cytological assessment. Respirology. 2004;9:392-396.
26. Lachman MF, Cellura K, Schofield K, et al. On-site adequacy assessments for image-directed fine needle aspirations: A study of 341 cases. Conn Med. 1995;59:657-660.
27. Moberly AC, Vural E, Nahas B, et al. Ultrasound-guided needle aspiration: Impact of immediate cytologic review. Laryngoscope. 2010;120:1979-1984.
28. O'Malley ME, Weir MM, Hahn PF, et al. US-guided fineneedle aspiration biopsy of thyroid nodules: Adequacy of cytologic material and procedure time with and without immediate cytologic analysis. Radiology. 2002;222:383-387.
29. Padhani AR, Scott Jr WW, Chehma M, et al. The value of immediate cytologic evaluation for needle aspiration lung biopsy. Invest Radiol. 1997;32:453-458.
30. Parikh A, Paul BB, Hartz D, et al. Effectiveness of ultrasoundguided thyroid FNA with on-site pathology. Thyroid. 2009;19:S41-S42.
31. Raab SS, Grzybicki DM, Sudilovsky D, et al. Effectiveness of Toyota process redesign in reducing thyroid gland fine-needle aspiration error. Am J Clin Pathol. 2006;126:585-592.
32. Redman R, Zalaznick H, Mazzaferri EL, et al. The impact of assessing specimen adequacy and number of needle passes for fine-needle aspiration biopsy of thyroid nodules. Thyroid. 2006;16:55-60.
33. Saleh HA, Khatib G. Positive economic and diagnostic accuracy impacts of on-site evaluation of fine needle aspiration biopsies by pathologists. Acta Cytol. 1996;40:1227-1230.
34. Santambrogio L, Nosotti M, Bellaviti N, et al. CT-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology of solitary pulmonary nodules: A prospective, randomized study of immediate cytologic evaluation. Chest. 1997;112:423-425.
35. Trisolini R, Cancellieri A, Tinelli C, et al. Rapid on-site evaluation of transbronchial aspirates in the diagnosis of hilar and mediastinal adenopathy: A randomized trial. Chest. 2011;139:395-401.
36. Virayavanich W, Ringler MD, Chin CT, et al. CT-guided biopsy of bone and soft-tissue lesions: Role of on-site immediate cytologic evaluation. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2011;22:1024-1030.
37. Yarmus L, Van Der Kloot T, Lechtzin N, et al. A randomized prospective trial of the utility of rapid on-site evaluation of transbronchial needle aspirate specimens. J Bronchol Interv Pulmonol. 2011;18:121-127.
38. Zhu W, Michael CW. How important is on-site adequacy assessment for thyroid FNA? An evaluation of 883 cases. Diagn Cytopathol. 2007;35:183-186.
39. Akalin A, Lu D, Woda B, et al. Rapid cell blocks improve accuracy of breast FNAs beyond that provided by conventional cell blocks regardless of immediate adequacy evaluation. Diagn Cytopathol. 2008;36:523-529.
40. Eisele DW, Sherman ME, Koch WM, et al. Utility of immediate on-site cytopathological procurement and evaluation in fine needle aspiration biopsy of head and neck masses. Laryngoscope. 1992;102:1328-1330.